Model
Loretta Lightningbolt
Posts: 4127
DEVILS ELBOW, Missouri, US
This one only has 4 comments....and I've always liked it. What do you guys think? Crap...I'm linking it the same way I always have...why aren't the img tags working?
Model
Vixen Intoxia
Posts: 1004
Bangor, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
This is mine, I like the floaty feeling going on here, I know people will criticize the background but I think it suits it ....... Vixen.
Model
Jessalyn
Posts: 21433
Denver, Colorado, US
Patrick Walberg wrote: Without a doubt .. this one! It is on this page; https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=17602 The reason? Look how high she is jumping! That is wet cement under Natalie, and she is a professional soccer player from Germany. I asked her to jump, but I had no idea she would give it that much height! After that, I was scared that she would land wrong and injure herself, so I said "we got it! I'd rather be safe than sorry! BTW, ... it's a film shot. Anyone else want to try jumping for me? I promise it wont be on wet cement! I'd jump for you but I already got a jumping shot. and it gets love https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=1630854
Model
xAudreyx
Posts: 3177
Madeira Beach, Florida, US
Jessalyn wrote: I think what bothers me about this one is that with the red light on you it has this aura of "red light district" which obviously is not something that matches your personality or who you are. obviously you aren't dressed to be in the red light district but that is the feel that the light gives me. Awww thank you so much Jessalyn. I'm happy to know you don't see my personality matching someone in the red light district. I would think a red light district image would appeal to the male sensibility. That confuses me. Thanks for your sweet comments
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Jessalyn wrote:
I think what bothers me about this one is that with the red light on you it has this aura of "red light district" which obviously is not something that matches your personality or who you are. obviously you aren't dressed to be in the red light district but that is the feel that the light gives me. I took it for exactly that. Hope I don't piss you off, Audrey, but that is what I thought you were trying for. I just don't think your expression is right in this one. Doesn't work for the picture (if that is what you were looking for) and doesn't do you justice.
Model
xAudreyx
Posts: 3177
Madeira Beach, Florida, US
Eric5312 wrote: I took it for exactly that. Hope I don't piss you off, Audrey, but that is what I thought you were trying for. I just don't think your expression is right in this one. Doesn't work for the picture (if that is what you were looking for) and doesn't do you justice. You're right. That's the idea, a red light district. Thanks for your comments. You guys are helping me solve the mystery
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Photographer
Patrick Walberg
Posts: 45475
San Juan Bautista, California, US
Patrick Walberg wrote: Without a doubt .. this one! It is on this page; https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=17602 The reason? Look how high she is jumping! That is wet cement under Natalie, and she is a professional soccer player from Germany. I asked her to jump, but I had no idea she would give it that much height! After that, I was scared that she would land wrong and injure herself, so I said "we got it! I'd rather be safe than sorry! BTW, ... it's a film shot. Anyone else want to try jumping for me? I promise it wont be on wet cement! Jessalyn wrote: I'd jump for you but I already got a jumping shot. and it gets love https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=1630854 Aww Jessalyn, Thank You! You jump quite high yourself! It does look like a dry surface under you. The background is nicer on yours. Maybe I should have someone p/s out the trees in my shot? But what the heck, now I shoot with digital like it's film .. lol There was a well known photographer who shot everyone in his studio doing a "jumping" picture. I forgot who ... ?
Model
Jessalyn
Posts: 21433
Denver, Colorado, US
Photographer
Patrick Walberg
Posts: 45475
San Juan Bautista, California, US
Eric5312 wrote:
Who could resist that lovable expression.
The expression while jumping tells a lot about ones personality! That is why I like pictures like hers!
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Vixen Intoxia wrote: This is mine, I like the floaty feeling going on here, I know people will criticize the background but I think it suits it ....... Vixen. Maybe if you want to keep the floaty feeling float up higher. Crop it so you are about 2/3 up in the picture.
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Jessalyn wrote:
you like it because if I had jumped any more forcefully you coulda seen my undies. LOL Excellent point!
Model
Vixen Intoxia
Posts: 1004
Bangor, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Eric5312 wrote:
Maybe if you want to keep the floaty feeling float up higher. Crop it so you are about 2/3 up in the picture. Good idea, Ill give the photographer a ring. Vixen.
Photographer
Patrick Walberg
Posts: 45475
San Juan Bautista, California, US
Jessalyn wrote:
you like it because if I had jumped any more forcefully you coulda seen my undies. LOL YOu have a fun loving personality! It shows! But look at your hand placement vs. Natalie. Then also notice you are straight on to the camera and she is at an angle. Those two differences actually speak many words as to who you are.
Photographer
Patrick Walberg
Posts: 45475
San Juan Bautista, California, US
Vixen Intoxia wrote: Good idea, Ill give the photographer a ring. Vixen. Sorry Vixon, but I've never really liked those sort of pictures where you blend so much onto the background. Also with all the space .. it would make a good shot to place letter graphics for an ad, but artistically I don't like how your hairline and skirt get lost. Definitely not your best shot! In my opinion ... anyway.
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Patrick Walberg wrote:
YOu have a fun loving personality! It shows! But look at your hand placement vs. Natalie. Then also notice you are straight on to the camera and she is at an angle. Those two differences actually speak many words as to who you are. Would you like to spell that out?
Photographer
Patrick Walberg
Posts: 45475
San Juan Bautista, California, US
Eric5312 wrote:
Would you like to spell that out? Eric, there is a whole book on the aspect of jumping pictures, but I'm just to lazy and pressed for time to search it out ... lol When I have some time, I'll see if I can find it.
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Patrick Walberg wrote:
Sorry Vixon, but I've never really liked those sort of pictures where you blend so much onto the background. Also with all the space .. it would make a good shot to place letter graphics for an ad, but artistically I don't like how your hairline and skirt get lost. Definitely not your best shot! In my opinion ... anyway. It's a shame because otherwise I really do like the clothing and the lighting. Could you reshoot it? I think it has a lot of potential. Actually with Photoshop (wait...wait...GASP) the photographer probably could correct that and straighten it out a tad.
Model
Jessalyn
Posts: 21433
Denver, Colorado, US
Vixen Intoxia wrote: This is mine, I like the floaty feeling going on here, I know people will criticize the background but I think it suits it ....... Vixen. the tie looks really huge and the spot of red in your hair actually looks like someone is shining a red light on that spot instead of your hair actually being that color.
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Patrick Walberg wrote:
Eric, there is a whole book on the aspect of jumping pictures, but I'm just to lazy and pressed for time to search it out ... lol When I have some time, I'll see if I can find it. That could be fun reading.
Photographer
nevar
Posts: 14670
Fort Smith, Arkansas, US
bah.... I got noooo feedback on my two suck ass pictures
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
ravens laughter wrote: bah.... I got noooo feedback on my two suck ass pictures OK already! : ) Had to go back to page 2 to find it. First picture, she looks constipated. Second picture (like most all of yours) I'd love to have in my port.
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Offshore Photography wrote:
Could she breathe?
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Artisnotanaccident wrote: Here's mine
I'm a big fan of Photoshop but maybe bring back a little bit of the detail. Original and composition is good.
Photographer
Stephen Melvin
Posts: 16334
Kansas City, Missouri, US
SickShooter wrote: This one only has 4 comments....and I've always liked it. What do you guys think? Crap...I'm linking it the same way I always have...why aren't the img tags working? Because you linked the page, and not the image. Change the code to match what I posted. It's a very nice image.
Model
Miya
Posts: 3241
San Diego, California, US
hm...maybe it's cuz I'm wearing clothes...
Photographer
UnoMundo
Posts: 47532
Olympia, Washington, US
Miya wrote: hm...maybe it's cuz I'm wearing clothes... I suspect you were taking a peepee there.
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Miya wrote: hm...maybe it's cuz I'm wearing clothes...
That's definitely a distraction. Otherwise the crop isn't quite right.
Model
Jessalyn
Posts: 21433
Denver, Colorado, US
UnoMundo Photography wrote:
I suspect you were taking a peepee there. why would she want to peepee on her dress?
Photographer
tjay
Posts: 41
Redding, California, US
Model
ANNABELLA
Posts: 1642
Atlanta, Georgia, US
This one has the least views. But its one of my faves.
Model
Miya
Posts: 3241
San Diego, California, US
UnoMundo Photography wrote:
I suspect you were taking a peepee there. HAHAHAHAHAHA no...but I am now. Thanks for making me lose all bladder control...
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
Jessalyn wrote:
why would she want to peepee on her dress? Ah...no, I'm not going to go there.
Photographer
UnoMundo
Posts: 47532
Olympia, Washington, US
ravens laughter wrote: enough views but no comments.... usually I would figure that people just don't know what to say about it. No reaction here, but plenty elsewhere. I think this image would have done fine on any one elses port, but since it is so regular, I don't think people think much of it. First of all you got too much talent to be fishing for compliments. Then you got to understand many are lazy and intellectually lazy and cant decipher your message. So they give up and move on. For 90% here it is butt shot or a pretty face.
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
ANNABELLA wrote: This one has the least views. But its one of my faves. Again I'd say the framing or the cropping is off, and it doen't show you to the best advantage.
Model
Aong Vang
Posts: 21
Maplewood, Minnesota, US
Photographer
Rik Austin
Posts: 12165
Austin, Texas, US
UnoMundo Photography wrote:
First of all you got too much talent to be fishing for compliments. Then you got to understand many are lazy and intellectually lazy and cant decipher your message. So they give up and move on. For 90% here it is butt shot or a pretty face. The first one is beautifully done, fantastic lighting, I still don't get the message (possibly speaking French would help), and I still think she looks constipated.
Photographer
Daren Turnbull
Posts: 640
Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
This one took ages to setup, I like it but no-one else seems to
|