This thread was locked on 2006-12-23 08:57:31
Photographer
Halcyon 7174 NYC
Posts: 20109
New York, New York, US
I've requested clarification from Tyler on the new troll/gwc rule as it relates to Rule#1, but do not yet have a response.
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
Kasmia wrote:
If it means I get wicked awesome animated sunglasses and a gavel it's worth it Go to sleep! Now!
Photographer
Hamza
Posts: 7791
New York, New York, US
Sara Danielle wrote: Absolutely NO FLAMING OR NAME CALLING. Mutual respect and civilized conversation is the required norm. Please keep profanity and gratuitously inflammatory language to a minimum. Personal attacks will not be tolerated on ModelMayhem.com. I consider this a personal attack. Yet I dont know if this is a joke or not. I have seen many locked threads that were locked because someone called another out by name. This seems no different? Unless its a joke? As I said before, Dan Hood is 'Special'... He's better than us and gets away with murder here on MM, but as the great 'Dan Hood' would say and has said before, "If you don't like it you don't have to stay, it's not like you're paying for this site"...
Photographer
Huynh Studios
Posts: 384
Sacramento, California, US
Please can somebody educate me what the hell is GWC stand for ? Guy with a camera ? Is that it ?
Photographer
Searcher
Posts: 775
New York, New York, US
Hamza wrote: To be fair one should refrain from calling 'anyone' any kind of name. Calling someone a troll or GWC is just as immature and childish as calling someone a 'penis' or an 'anus'. What about Ennis? That's a silly name.
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
Huynh Photography wrote: Please can somebody educate me what the hell is GWC stand for ? Guy with a camera ? Is that it ? Yes. Guy with camera. Referring to a guy who just wants to see boobies so he gets a camera to take pics of some models' boobies.
Photographer
Kas_
Posts: 11110
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Milli wrote:
Go to sleep! Now! Ok Sweet dreams peoples of MM
Photographer
James Jackson Fashion
Posts: 11132
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
Huynh Photography wrote: Please can somebody educate me what the hell is GWC stand for ? Guy with a camera ? Is that it ? Oh good god... tell me you haven't read the FAQs yet...
Photographer
Searcher
Posts: 775
New York, New York, US
Milli wrote: Go to sleep! Now! ... or I will put you there!
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
Kasmia wrote:
Ok Sweet dreams peoples of MM LoL. you know you aren't going to bed
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
Searcher wrote:
... or I will put you there! haha. again with the funniness!
Photographer
James Jackson Fashion
Posts: 11132
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
Milli wrote: Go to sleep! Now! Searcher wrote: ... or I will put you there! Mommy?
Photographer
Huynh Studios
Posts: 384
Sacramento, California, US
James Jackson wrote:
Oh good god... tell me you haven't read the FAQs yet... Nope. There are something just not worth reading.
Photographer
Kevin Connery
Posts: 17825
El Segundo, California, US
Searcher wrote: What about taking pictures? Will you be doing any of that? And if so, will you be sharing some sort of still photos? Huynh Photography wrote: I just did two shoots today. I actually work full time as a photographer. I just have a lot of computers online. I thought you said you worked IT--help desk?
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
James Jackson wrote:
Milli wrote: Go to sleep! Now! Mommy? yes dear? lol.
Photographer
Hoodlum
Posts: 10254
Sacramento, California, US
Hamza wrote:
Just because you are called an instigator GWC doesn't mean that those words are taken lightly by Professionals in the field of Photography. To a Professional Photographer, being called a GWC is offensive. You should re-think your position on this, because someone may call you an asshole, and to me and many others here on MM, calling someone or being called an asshole is not offensive. Get my meaning? What is right for one is not right for every-one. To be fair one should refrain from calling 'anyone' any kind of name. Calling someone a troll or GWC is just as immature and childish as calling someone a 'penis' or an 'anus'. It wasn't just my position on them it was others and the big guy himself. No real pro is going to be bothered by GWC. They are just options not facts.
Photographer
Pat Thielen
Posts: 16800
Hastings, Minnesota, US
Milli wrote:
Go to sleep! Now! No! And you can't make me! Neener neener!
Photographer
James Jackson Fashion
Posts: 11132
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
Huynh Photography wrote:
Nope. There are something just not worth reading. probably knowing where the bleeding line you want to stand at the edge of lies would be a good thing to read... but... be my guest.
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
Pat Thielen wrote:
No! And you can't make me! Neener neener! Oh yeah I can! Wait...that wouldn't be legal. Damn it! nevermind.
Photographer
Hamza
Posts: 7791
New York, New York, US
Dan Hood mm/moderator wrote: It wasn't just my position on them it was others and the big guy himself. No real pro is going to be bothered by GWC. They are just options not facts. So if it is say my opinion that someone is an asshole and I can't prove it as a fact, are you telling me it's okay to call them that? I mean it would be my opinion, not a solid fact... Right????
Photographer
Pat Thielen
Posts: 16800
Hastings, Minnesota, US
Milli wrote:
Oh yeah I can! Wait...that wouldn't be legal. Damn it! nevermind. Ha ha! But your threat I find intriguing... Would you care to elaborate?
Model
Sara Danielle
Posts: 1437
Dan Hood mm/moderator wrote:
It wasn't just my position on them it was others and the big guy himself. No real pro is going to be bothered by GWC. They are just options not facts. If thats a fact then why not put him in the brig or cancel his account? Why call him out on a forum? I really dont get this. Being honest please explain.
Photographer
Huynh Studios
Posts: 384
Sacramento, California, US
Kevin Connery wrote:
Searcher wrote: What about taking pictures? Will you be doing any of that? And if so, will you be sharing some sort of still photos? I thought you said you worked IT--help desk? I quit a few weeks ago. I walked into work. Decided that I no longer need it. So I just walked out. Now I have plenty of free time on my hands.
Photographer
Searcher
Posts: 775
New York, New York, US
Hamza wrote: So if it is say my opinion that someone is an asshole and I can't prove it as a fact, are you telling me it's okay to call them that? I mean it would be my opinion, not a solid fact... Right???? Everything about you as a person just screams "I have an asshole!"
Photographer
Huynh Studios
Posts: 384
Sacramento, California, US
I'm an asshole. That's a fact. GWC. This is offensive to me.
Photographer
Searcher
Posts: 775
New York, New York, US
Huynh Photography wrote: I quit a few weeks ago. I walked into work. Decided that I no longer need it. So I just walked out. Now I have plenty of free time on my hands. So, by full time, you mean you are available to work full time?
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
Pat Thielen wrote:
Ha ha! But your threat I find intriguing... Would you care to elaborate? LoL. I would, but I wouldnt want to participate in any thread-hijacking!
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
Huynh Photography wrote: I'm an asshole. That's a fact. GWC. This is offensive to me. That is soo sexy that you can admit that. I. want. you. now.
Photographer
Hoodlum
Posts: 10254
Sacramento, California, US
Hamza wrote:
So if it is say my opinion that someone is an asshole and I can't prove it as a fact, are you telling me it's okay to call them that? I mean it would be my opinion, not a solid fact... Nope asshole is not on the approved list. It was discussed today. I'll tell you one thing my experiment is working about like I thought. If Tyler changes policy I'll lock or modify the post. Only Troll and GWC are on there. those will most likely be the only exceptions.
Photographer
James Jackson Fashion
Posts: 11132
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
Milli wrote:
That is soo sexy that you can admit that. I. want. you. now. damnit... why don't they ever want nice guys like me ok ok you can all stop laughing now....
Photographer
Ronin Photos
Posts: 15
Littleton, Colorado, US
So...Sticks and Stones...you know what i mean..sheesh. I feel like i'm middle school again.
Photographer
Pat Thielen
Posts: 16800
Hastings, Minnesota, US
Milli wrote:
LoL. I would, but I wouldnt want to participate in any thread-hijacking! Yeah, right...! Pulling the old "I don't want to thread-jack" excuse, eh?
Photographer
Hamza
Posts: 7791
New York, New York, US
Searcher wrote:
Hamza wrote: So if it is say my opinion that someone is an asshole and I can't prove it as a fact, are you telling me it's okay to call them that? I mean it would be my opinion, not a solid fact... Right???? Everything about you as a person just screams "I have an asshole!" It's about being fair, even though I don't like the person Dan Hood called out in a public forum, I don't agree that it was right or fair. Had you or I done it, we'd be suspended... Once suspended, we'd complain and all Mr. Dan Hood would tell us is that we, mere members of the MM community were in violation and if we don't agree we don't have to, we can just leave... How the fuck is that fair???
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
James Jackson wrote:
damnit... why don't they ever want nice guys like me ok ok you can all stop laughing now.... haha! lol thats funny oh wait, I was supposed to have stopped laughing. oops!
Photographer
Pat Thielen
Posts: 16800
Hastings, Minnesota, US
Huynh Photography wrote: I'm an asshole. That's a fact. GWC. This is offensive to me. Asshole maybe. GWC -- nope.
Photographer
Searcher
Posts: 775
New York, New York, US
Dan Hood mm/moderator wrote: Nope asshole is not on the approved list. It was discussed today. I'll tell you one thing my experiment is working about like I thought. If Tyler changes policy I'll lock or modify the post. Only Troll and GWC are on there. those will most likely be the only exceptions. Ok, yes, unrelated. I just really like this jpeg.
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
Pat Thielen wrote:
Yeah, right...! Pulling the old "I don't want to thread-jack" excuse, eh? oh...pulling the old, reverse psychology trick eh? nice! hehe lol.
Photographer
James Jackson Fashion
Posts: 11132
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
Hamza wrote: How the fuck is that fair??? Life is not fair. MM as a small part of life, is not fair by an equally smaller amount of fairness.
Model
_Absentia_
Posts: 9339
Austin, Indiana, US
Searcher wrote: Ok, yes, unrelated. I just really like this jpeg. omg i can't stop laughing...oh, my sides! Searcher you crack me up.
Photographer
Searcher
Posts: 775
New York, New York, US
|