|
Forums >
General Industry >
Would you share your favorite "Lolita" image?
Here is mine:  Nov 20 06 12:03 am Link  Dec 31 06 05:06 am Link whats a lolita image? Dec 31 06 05:07 am Link Underage or young looking girls. Dec 31 06 08:26 am Link a girl who look very sexually innocent and young i would say in the movie Lolita by Stanley Kubrick - Sue Lyon Dec 31 06 08:27 am Link Daniel Woolfolk wrote: Ever see The Professional? Dec 31 06 08:45 am Link Daniel Woolfolk wrote: Searcher wrote: FYI: for those of us not from [America], that might not have shown in our country? or might have had a different name; internat'l crowd present ... but yeah, the "Lolita" image kind of rings through. hmm. Dec 31 06 08:52 am Link Searcher wrote:
Dec 31 06 08:52 am Link  Dec 31 06 08:55 am Link Dec 31 06 08:55 am Link  Dec 31 06 08:56 am Link Like this??? Dec 31 06 08:56 am Link I did a shoot once with a nice young lady, had good ID for being 18, and after I looked at the pictures, felt like a pervy creep. And they weren't nude. She was just so young-looking. I didn't enjoy it. I think I'll pass. Dec 31 06 09:07 am Link Emiliano83 wrote: No. Wow. No. Dec 31 06 09:08 am Link Dec 31 06 09:14 am Link Why not??? More lolitas than these??? Dec 31 06 09:14 am Link Here's mine: https://modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=1980473 Same girl as my avatar with a tad bit more Lolita-esque qualities, I guess. Dec 31 06 09:29 am Link Lolita is a tricky image to pull off. Lolita is a young girl barely pubescent, but with a sensuality/sexual precociousness beyond her years. Nabokov's Lolita was 12 years old. If you use an actual underage model for such an image, it is easy to run afoul of the authorities. If you use a model over 18, it is harder to capture the element of innocence needed along with the sensuality & sexual precociousness. Dec 31 06 10:07 am Link Jim Ball wrote: Somebody who knows these things better then myself can probably clarify, or verify. Dec 31 06 10:33 am Link JT Hodges wrote: I am aware of this. It's directed primarily at porn and makes it illegal to portray a person in a sexually explicit manner (paraphrasing the actual law) as underage in any media, even if they are not. "Lolita" images of adult women in school girl outfits does not meet the criteria as no one is fooled into believing that it is a pubescent girl in the image. I think the key to that law is that the image must pursuade the viewer that they are viewing a pubescent or underage girl or child. Photorealistic computer generated images fall under that law, iirc. Dec 31 06 10:51 am Link inspired from the movie poster:  Dec 31 06 10:58 am Link  Dec 31 06 10:59 am Link Im'age NY (INY) wrote: Great film, and kind of fits the thread when you think how old Natalie Portman was etc... Dec 31 06 11:01 am Link Emiliano83 wrote: Dude. Thats awesome! Its like an image shot by David Hamblengton when he was just a beginner. That frightening composishun lends a "dynamic tension" to the framing of the shot. The slightly flat exposure adds "pathos" - whatever that is - and the fact that she's waaaaay too fat to be a "lolita" creates a cognitive dissonance in the viewer that raises this image to the level of performance art. Dec 31 06 11:04 am Link GWC wrote: ouch.... Dec 31 06 11:10 am Link  This is as close as I have ever come to a lolita image.... Dec 31 06 11:12 am Link Doug Swinskey wrote: well, we all know GWC is the rawkinist dude around. And he also has some really good observations. I would TFP with him anytime.....oh, I mean Lapis. Dec 31 06 11:13 am Link I'm told this is "Lolita-ish". I don't know, but it does get the most views in my portfolio for some reason.  Dec 31 06 11:14 am Link Love to see more of this...unfortunately...don't have time to locate my contributions..... but I just LOVED the last Lolita movie with Jeremy Irons....all the sexuality aside... it was very much a profound tale of impossible love... and not simple lust... that destroyed Humbert. I was deeply moved by the story, how societal norms can crush those who don't fit in. Romantic love recognizes no such things as race,age,social position...and many a tragedy, Opera has explored such themes. Sultry, sexy playfulness is always delightful to explore as well. Dec 31 06 11:33 am Link is this lolita-esque?   model: xshatteredstarx Dec 31 06 11:39 am Link StudioMona wrote: A very pretty lady in a nice image, but it doesn't really hit me as what Nabokov was describing. The key word is lady. This is obviously a woman and not a woman-child. Dec 31 06 11:51 am Link Jim Ball wrote: nope..but I will Dec 31 06 11:54 am Link Jim Ball wrote: StudioMona wrote: I like the 1997 version with Dominick Swain & Jeremy Irons better. It comes closer to the pathos of Nabokov's novel than the 1962 version. Dec 31 06 12:02 pm Link pegasusmaiden wrote: This is a cute image. (Is it you?) Dec 31 06 12:06 pm Link TroisCouleurs wrote:
Dec 31 06 12:07 pm Link dgold wrote: that picture does not look lolita-ish to me at all. Dec 31 06 12:13 pm Link  not exactlty the kind of lolita you were describibing. Dec 31 06 12:16 pm Link This was one I did last summer. My friend toook the photos http://www.fragilemuse.org http://myspace-787.vo.llnwd.net/00464/7 … 0787_l.jpg Dec 31 06 12:17 pm Link TroisCouleurs wrote: Question for TroisCouleurs: Is this an image of you? If not, who is the model & photographer. I can't access the Photobucket album as I am not a member. Dec 31 06 12:17 pm Link Only the first shot in the thread and the two movie posters have anything remotely lolita-ish going on. It was a man-girl relationship. Wikipedia wrote: Dec 31 06 12:17 pm Link |
