Forums >
General Industry >
Exposing Pervs with Cameras...
Rossi Photography wrote: No it has not gone over anyones head Rossi, the thing is you made a thread in which you put forth one instance of this persons actions. You left the door open for people who see two sides to each coin to ask very simple questions of you about that instance. No one is against getting rid of these people, I definately am for it. But I need to know the whole story from your end before I decide to join with you in the fight that is surly going to come. I don't care if you did or did not have a relationship of any kind with him, working or otherwise, its your motivation for throwing him out there to be ripped apart is the issue. Saving all the models from the wolves is great but you did not need to use your chosen example unless your going to be forth coming with the whole story from your point of view. Calling people assinine and stupid or trying to say they are unable to grasp the issue is useless and arrogant to say the least. Sep 30 06 08:40 pm Link Hadyn Lassiter wrote: This'll be the last time I respond to anything you have to say, Haydn. Because in my opinion, I think you are a very disturbed individual. And I'm not saying that to be mean. I honestly think that by how you've conducted yourself in some of these threads. I honestly feel sorry for you. It's clear you have issues. Sep 30 06 08:45 pm Link Rossi Photography wrote: That pretty much sums up the issue. Asking questions makes me an asshole,oK. Sep 30 06 08:48 pm Link Hadyn Lassiter wrote: Money? I'm a full time college student. There is no money to be found here until about 5 years from now. I don't care if you take notice of what I have to offer, especially if you think $ is what makes someone worthwhile. And where did I say anything about telling her to get into a legal battle? All I suggested was a thread to inform models of the tactics people like him use to manipulate models - without giving his name. And as a matter of fact I did ask her some questions via the messaging system. Sep 30 06 08:50 pm Link Hadyn Lassiter wrote: Reading comprehension. Work on it. Sep 30 06 08:53 pm Link Hey Rossi, Please contact me privately about this individual. I'm pretty well known and respected in the Detroit area and I ABSOLUTELY HATE and DESPISE individuals who prey on young naive, new models for their own perversions. Thanks, Sam T'ang www.SamTang.com Sep 30 06 09:09 pm Link A lot of people say check references, meet him in public, why didn't you run, call the cops, etc. It's not that easy. I had a model who is a very close friend ask me to escort her to a meeting with a photographer who claims to work for the sherrif's department. I was forced to decline due to schedule conflicts. When she returned, she told me that he asked her to go into a bathroom in a public place and take off her clothes with him so he could "get some ideas". To my shock and dismay she did. When I asked her why she told me that she felt intimidated and didn't know what to do. Looking back, the man was twice her size, wearing a sheriff's department badge, and she was alone (although in public). The same model has been contacted by convicted child molesters, photographed by a man who was later arrested for indency with a child, and now this. When threatened many people become passive or cower. Yeah, maybe a dude with the sheriff's department would be packin', and maybe he would have a contingency plan for dealing with an escort, but all the same I wish I had been there. Because I am still friends with the snipers from my old unit, and those boys are just itching to use that Barret .50 cal Sep 30 06 09:12 pm Link Idaho Edokpayi wrote: Ha! Finally the solution for these assholes. Snipers. I like you. Sep 30 06 09:14 pm Link e-string wrote: There was nothing antagonistic in my questions, any lawyer is going to ask far deeper questions than I did. By advising her to start a thread on this issue leaves her open to legal action at some point. Money is not the issue,telling the whole story is, not just the part you feel everyone should know. Its an open forum and as such supplying half the story invites people who think and reason to ask questions. So get over yourself and stop calling me immature for what you and her should be doing,giving the whole story complete since she opened the door with her thread. Sep 30 06 09:25 pm Link All our actions fall prey to the law unintended consequences http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintended_consequence Some call this a type of Karma. We must consider with care what we say and do. Words can have a great power. I know I may sound a little werid with this post but what may seem a good thing to do may not be. Sep 30 06 09:35 pm Link geezx I don't want any more part of this thread-as-p*ssing-match and I don't know how it got turned into one. What I think I've already said: time to put this away, tell anyone who ASKS that you have reservations about this guy and if ASKED be willing to explain why but I don't see any reasoning that would suggest a successful or necessary pro-activity. Oct 01 06 06:10 am Link winner?? Oct 12 06 03:09 pm Link All this nonsense about lawsuits is just that: nonsense. There are plenty of ways to protect yourself yet speak your mind, and virtually nobody is going to be able to afford a lawsuit for slander, or be able to get an ambulance-chaser interested in pursuing it, unless there are deep pockets involved and it's an open and shut case. If I say "I think so-and-so is a creep" it's not actionable. Why? It's a statement of my opinion, and "creep" is not something you can prove or disprove one way or another. If I say "I think so-and-so is a crappy photographer" it's not actionable. Why? It's a statement of my opinion. In fact, "Perv" is a colloqualism, like "a**hole" and it would be extremely difficult for someone to start a lawsuit over another person saying another is a "perv" because there's no objective standard for the term. Libel and Slander come into play when you are saying things about another person about which you can or can't prove they are true. If you were to say "Marcus Ranum keeps 2 models chained up in the basement of his studio" then I'd have a case, assuming that damaged my business or reputation, etc. Because I could fairly easily show that I didn't and that you were lying in order to hurt me. It is entirely legal and acceptable to say awful things about other people as long as they are either a) true or b) couched as opinion. I'd have a hell of a time getting a lawyer to go after someone for saying "I think Marcus Ranum is a perv" - no ambulance chaser would touch it on contingency and I'd have to take a second mortgage in order to pay a lawyer to pursue the case -- and he'd be warning me the whole time that I was going to lose. It'd cost about $10,000 just to get started on a lawsuit like that and it'd cost me half that to send a couple crystal-meth smoking bikers with a crowbar to your house - which would be more likely? Which would satisfy me more? You got it. There are innumerable terms you can use that are not actionable. You could say that a photographer is "skeevy" or "creepy" or (even better) "makes my flesh crawl" and nobody can touch you legally. "I think so-and-so makes comments about models that are inappropriate" - nobody can touch you. "His work is disgusting" - nobody can touch you. "I can't stand his attitude toward models" - nobody can touch you. Just don't go pulling a Tawana Brawley and say you saw someone grope someone, if you didn't. Too many people watch too much courtroom drama on TV and get the idea that the courts are a useful way of resolving a personal dispute. They are not. Some photographer suing someone for saying he was a "perv" would probably not even make it into Stupid People's Court let alone on the docket of any court in any state in the US. Before you start getting your panties all wadded up about lawyers, go to the grocery copy and read an issue of the Weekly World News - it's a case-study in how far you can go without slandering or libeling someone: "Angelina Jolie said to be seen at nude photoshoot with GWC" - can't touch it; it's just reporting an alleged incident. "President Bush: was he replaced by a bobble-head space alien?" - can't touch it; it's a question. Before people on an internet chat board need to start worrying about some photographer suing for being called a "perv" you'll see a lot of settlements as hollywood personalities go after the pant-pant mags. But that won't happen. And those of you who fear legal action because of something you post here: you're not that important. I'm sorry to say but unless you manage to piss off an insane billionaire or a drug kingpin, nobody here will have the resources or time to waste on you. Sure, you might get years of he-said-she-said bullsh*t and an enemy for life, but a lawsuit? Give me a break. It'd be much more likely that someone'd show up on your doorstep wearing gloves and carrying a claw-hammer than you'll get sued. So let's all lighten up a bit about the lawyer-waving. mjr. Oct 12 06 03:37 pm Link Ought To Be Shot wrote: Not even close. Oct 12 06 03:49 pm Link I'm still trying to figure out, if it was a professional relationship, why you'd be in his home and able to access his computer? I was at his place and I found in his computer MY photos. If I missed the response I apologize, the pissing match was getting a bit tedious so I skipped over about 4 pages lol. But of course I saw the inevitable, "oh I'm a photographer in the Detroit area and I hate the photographers that take advantage of their models" comment. Yes, everybody else is unprofessional. The "shoot with me or take your chances on bad things happening" is soooo noble. Oct 12 06 03:51 pm Link Rossi Photography wrote: Even if you do name someone, you haven't done anything wrong. It's only slander or libel if you're saying something that is provably untrue and is not a matter of opinion. Oct 12 06 03:57 pm Link To me, the real issue is - if you believe something strongly enough, you should say it regardless of who is asking, and how. If you don't respect your own opinions at least that much then you shouldn't expect others to respect them at all. Dragging your own lack of conviction into a public forum just makes you look like a coward. "Hey, I think this guy sucks. I'm not willing to keep my mouth shut about it but I'm not willing to name names, either." that's just so lame. mjr. Oct 12 06 04:00 pm Link Rossi Photography wrote: I think your point is well taken, Rossi. Anyone who can make the net safer for models (and everyone else for that matter) should be commended for caring. Perv photographers hurt the reputation of every legitimate working professional through their sleazy actions. There's nothing wrong with looking for a way to expose them. Oct 12 06 04:11 pm Link Exposing Pervs With Cameras 101 There are two ways: first, you can set the exposure compensation by one stop ("+1"); or, you manually set the ISO rating on the camera to 200 from 100. Both yield equivalent Perv pictures. The difference, however, is that setting the camera's exposing compensation does not adjust the film developing time, it directly affects the exposure time in the shutter release. So, it would go from 1/15 of a second to an 1/8 of a second, which is the wrong directionâwe're hoping to use a shorter shutter release time so we can hand-hold the picture because those pervs move a lot. By setting the ISO to 200 from 100, the camera thinks the film is faster, so it's not adjusting the time at all. It's just shooting at 200, and that accurate light reading for 200 is 1/30 of a second. This results in properly exposed perv on camera! Oct 12 06 04:17 pm Link Rossi Photography wrote: do it on myspace....bulletin to all your friends Oct 12 06 04:30 pm Link Bizarre story! Why would anyone go back after someone tried to pull their pants down?! Oct 12 06 04:49 pm Link e-string wrote: Beautiful. Two clowns in the one post. "Yeah, me and my old army buddies we're missing shooting people, we'll kill him." "Yeah, yay you, I like that!". Oct 13 06 09:41 am Link |