Forums >
General Industry >
I am so SICK of these crazy internet models!!!
Colegrove Photography wrote: The "friends thing" lol oh boy! Fresh meat anyone? Jan 11 07 01:13 am Link What? I gotta do the bump too? lol This threads been quite fun! Jan 11 07 01:15 am Link The problem is that "internet" models who are 5'5' with nice tiâ 's and a$$ rely to much on the concept that they should charge money to guys who think they are the next avedon. Or if they are young, 5'11"1/2" and stunning they decide to work for big bucks only + hotel and meal.... Not that this is a bad thing especially if you over 35. BUT the big picture is that if you want to be a professional fashion/commercial model go to a reputable agency an let the agency devolop you. Sticking around the forms may make you money for a while when your young. Then you hit 25 and your chances of making it are next to nothing when you could have been pro. just my opinion. Jan 11 07 01:17 am Link Patrick Walberg wrote: Yes I am new as for freash meat I'd prefer chicken over bacon though. Jan 11 07 01:17 am Link there are pills if you are sick Jan 11 07 01:19 am Link Even though this thread has been posted many times it never seems to get better. The funny part to me is how some are saying this site is becoming more like Myspace. I only say this because I recently posted a casting for models in California for a magazine I work with. The pay is 100 and it is a two page spread with the models name and any website listed so people can contact her or view her site if it is paid or whatever. Unfortunately this seems to be to small for many of the "pro" models on this site so I received like 7 messages and got kind of bitter. I mean I am not sure what many models on this site expect but it really has me wondering. Anyway, I mentioned Myspace because if I am just going to post on Myspace or any other site for these types of jobs because I will get 3 times the amount of responses in 1 day and many of the girls will be good looking. I have been trying to post here to help out models who are trying hard in this tough industry but it is so frustrating, especially seeing models who would rather shoot tfp with some donkey than take a little money and get in a magazine. Oh well, like someone mentioned, time to move on Jan 11 07 01:20 am Link daniel alvarado photo wrote: Actually you either need a portfolio or big money school to get in to get developed. Jan 11 07 01:21 am Link Michael Moon Studios wrote: You are absolutely right! They are aweful! Jan 11 07 01:22 am Link Lamonica wrote: he DIDNT hit on me. he didnt say anything. that wasnt even the point of my post. maybe you got a little confused. i was saying that this guy who isnt even interested in modeling made a profile on mm just talking about his interests. aka this website is turning into myspace. Jan 11 07 01:24 am Link karennn wrote: Do you not know what "not you, just in general" means? Jan 11 07 01:26 am Link the really disturbing thing is how much toilet paper you girls use ... ;-) TroisCouleurs wrote: Jan 11 07 01:32 am Link richard boswell wrote: You mean Playboy from cover to back Jan 11 07 01:34 am Link Lamonica wrote: i do, but i wasnt quite sure what your response had in relation to what i had posted before. Jan 11 07 01:35 am Link so is the flip side of GWC ... GWD = girl with delusions ? (hoping this is something new in this tired old thread) Nick7286 wrote: Jan 11 07 01:36 am Link Gee, I forgot where this all started. Jan 11 07 01:36 am Link i never was much of a fan of playboy myself, so go ahead use it as you see fit, but i prefer something harder to read, and softer to wipe with. ;-) TroisCouleurs wrote: Jan 11 07 01:40 am Link karennn wrote: It's not allowed, it is considered flaming.... please remove the link. Jan 11 07 01:41 am Link wow I never had one of my very OWN pics used in the thread...thanks TroisCouleurs I had a model look at that photo and she started laughing saying "If you guys only knew that we girls do that all the time... we love to look at porn too" hahaha Okay girls...RAISE YOUR HAND if you like to look at porn (like Playboy I dont mean the SKANKY stuff) Jan 11 07 01:46 am Link Michael Moon Studios wrote: It's soooo true... I would always read my bf's Maxim's and Playboy's on the pot. Jan 11 07 01:48 am Link Michael Moon Studios wrote: Jan 11 07 01:48 am Link Geo Silva wrote: Mmmm, yes, and lots of hash browns... Jan 11 07 01:49 am Link Michael Moon Studios wrote: What a disappointment Jan 11 07 01:52 am Link Todd Liebman wrote: I make the greatest breakfast! Hash browns with garlic, onion and secret hash ingredients that make it crispy then of course bacon and eggs! Yummy! Jan 11 07 01:54 am Link Chics dig guys with skill. Guys dig chics who read porn! Jan 11 07 01:56 am Link Patrick Walberg wrote: waves... Jan 11 07 01:56 am Link you guys are making me hungry Jan 11 07 01:56 am Link daniel alvarado photo wrote: Thanks, that was very encouraging. Jan 11 07 01:56 am Link I'm a crazy internet model. Jan 11 07 01:58 am Link Michael Moon Studios wrote: Jan 11 07 02:04 am Link Anjel Britt wrote: Hi Anjel! (does the wave) I see ya and I'll raise you $$ Jan 11 07 02:08 am Link Mia Salen wrote: But are you hungry? Jan 11 07 02:09 am Link Jeez hungryeye... you off your meds again? Jan 11 07 02:13 am Link LOL...I finally broke down and read this threat. God, what a hooooot. Too funny. And the award goes to 'Model on the Pot" (and related responses) Jan 11 07 02:16 am Link Star wrote: hehe sooooooooo cute and evil Jan 11 07 06:11 am Link Michael Moon Studios wrote: Jan 11 07 06:18 am Link Image K wrote: Everyone starts out as wannabees, it's how serious you are. Jan 11 07 06:33 am Link Lestari wrote: Is that...Indonesian Bacon?? Jan 11 07 06:40 am Link Raven Photography wrote: I agree too. To be frank, some of the people on here are being too harsh on the photographer. He is stating some of the same things that the attackers discuss on these forums frequent. The man didn't generalize nor attacked any individual models or photographers by name. Jan 11 07 07:35 am Link The sock monkeys are funny. Jan 11 07 07:37 am Link I dunno, I've done it both ways. If a client hired me to take photos for them, I'd feel an obligation to make sure the model they are paying for can deliver the look they want and I'd be more inclined to go to a model who has experience. Webcam pics and cell phone photos do not tell me how Model X will perform during an actual shoot with a team standing by, lighting pointed at her, spectators watching (if it's a shoot out in public) and the possibility of nervousness iif it's her first shoot. On the other hand, I've worked with people who have never modeled for my own personal prjects and paid them the same rate I would have given a model with some experience under her belt. Jan 11 07 08:15 am Link |