Brandy wrote:
In my port it is very much the truth... I have one nude with over 6,000 views...

Make that two...

So I wasn't way off base with my assumptions.

Huynh Photography wrote:
So we're basically a bunch of perverts in disguise as photographer.

Who's in disguise?
Melvin??
Where are you bro?

Iona Lynn wrote:
*Flashes her boobies at OP and runs off *

I wanna be a n00b so Iona will flash me her b(0)(0)bies!

Huynh Photography wrote:
I guess some people think that if a girl poses nude, she is better than the ones that doesn't.

Some people think that photographers who can use correct grammar are better than the ones that DON'T.

Samantha Grace wrote:
They do, I had nudes up for 48 hours once. I had about 250 views. Like 5 comments. I took them down, because I felt people were only looking at my nudes.

Now I remember why I stopped looking at your port... 

Huynh Photography wrote:
I guess some people think that if a girl poses nude, she is better than the ones that doesn't.

Not a better PERSON but certainly a better MODEL

Sarah Ellis wrote:

Some people think that photographers who can use correct grammar are better than the ones that DON'T.

OK, now you're just being picky. DON'T. Gotcha.

Leond wrote:
Not even need to mention nudes.
Any horrid snapshot with a woman in it in anything resembling a "sexy" pose gets 10385730858 comments like "sexy stuff girl!" and "amazing lighting and color".
Put a macro of a nipple which takes the entire frame and you get even more comments.Its quite pathetic.Perhaps half the people on the site are kids looking for porno?
Some are also "photographers" who really want to get a TFCD with the model in question,so they try to make an impression by brown nosing,wether the pics deserve it or not.
Truth be told,half of the people on the site seem to want those pat in the back comments.Last time i left a constructive critique on a photo that had nothing but useless prasie the user deleted it instantly.

I also think every photographer is a pervert =]

I agree 100% on all counts. I do know one old time photographer who is not a pervert.
As for the rest of us, yes every photographer is a pervert.

Sarah Ellis wrote:

Some people think that photographers who can use correct grammar are better than the ones that DON'T.

Some models just need to stop being a smart mouth. Just sit there and look pretty. Don't talk. We don't need to hear from models.

Huynh Photography wrote:
Am I even close to this assumption ?

The images in my portfolio are varied. The 18+ images have less then some of the clothed imaged because the ones with twice number of comments show action in them or are of a very well know and liked model.
Nude is ok, but try drawing the attention of the viewing audience with a clothed model and I say you’ve got something.

Huynh Photography wrote:

Some models just need to stop being a smart mouth. Just sit there and look pretty. Don't talk. We don't need to hear from models.

Did no one else notice this comment?  Excuse me, what?  You posted in the general forum of a website called MODEL mayhem and you don't want to talk to models.  I'm confused.

Iona Lynn wrote:
Welcome to the Internet

Good morning OP

You have just stepped out of your safe little world of agency modeling, and into the big bad world of internet photography. There are no rules here; a girl who is 5’ 1” in 4” stiletto heals can get paid work from photographers, so can a girl who is bigger than a size 4. The typical agency rules don’t apply to us anymore. Sorry about that, in just a few days your in box will be filled with silly little girls with crappy web cam photos saying they love your work, yet you need to pay 150.00 an hour to shoot them. Not to make it too complicated there are several different camps of people all colliding on this site:

Agency models and photographers = work for clients and have a set of standards
Artist models and photographers = work for art and the chance to be in the galleries.
Amateur models and photographers = work to learn some of these guys and girls will move up and do some great work in the above categories.
GWP and GWC = it’s all about the b(o)(o)bies.

Welcome to our world…………………………………………..

*Flashes her boobies at OP and runs off *

I completely agree. I started out in the Catogory of Amature Photogrpher - as it pertains to working with Models. Now I beleive and am looking forward to creating some exceptional photos that can be displayed and maybe offered money for.

Sarah Ellis wrote:
Some people think that photographers who can use correct grammar are better than the ones that DON'T.

Huynh Photography wrote:
Some models just need to stop being a smart mouth. Just sit there and look pretty. Don't talk. We don't need to hear from models.

That was certainly rude. I happen to like hearing from Sarah. Unfortunately, I can't say the same for you...

Glen Berry wrote:
That was certainly rude. I happen to like hearing from Sarah. Unfortunately, I can't say the same for you...

Thank you Glen *bats eyelashes*

Huynh Photography wrote:
Some models just need to stop being a smart mouth. Just sit there and look pretty. Don't talk. We don't need to hear from models.

Well, between this thread and the "Sleeping with models" thread I was guessing the OP was a troll
Now with this comment I'n sure of it

Sarah Ellis wrote:

Did no one else notice this comment?  Excuse me, what?  You posted in the general forum of a website called MODEL mayhem and you don't want to talk to models.  I'm confused.

Sorry. Let's forget it. I was trying to be sarcastic. I'm a bit out of it today. I am on vacation and caught a cold... in Phoenix of all places. Beautiful weather but I am sick as a dog.

Glen Berry wrote:

Sarah Ellis wrote:
Some people think that photographers who can use correct grammar are better than the ones that DON'T.

That was certainly rude. I happen to like hearing from Sarah. Unfortunately, I can't say the same for you...

I don't kiss ass to anyone. Certainly not to models. Models are nothing more than just props with legs. That's all they are to me. They are just nothing more than a mannequin. If I could find me mannequins to work with, I would have used it instead of models.

Huynh Photography wrote:
I don't kiss ass to anyone. Certainly not to models. Models are nothing more than just props with legs. That's all they are to me. They are just nothing more than a mannequin. If I could find me mannequins to work with, I would have used it instead of models.

Wow.  Have some Prozac & a smile, and maybe find a new line of work 

Huynh Photography wrote:
I guess some people think that if a girl poses nude, she is better than the ones that doesn't.

No, nuditiy is appealing to the human eye.  Its just wired in our brains that way.  I mean, think of this fact....on average, men think about sex every 52 seconds, and women on average, think about it once or twice a day. (from a special on 20/20)

So I don't think it has anything to do with who is better than who.

Samantha Grace wrote:
They do, I had nudes up for 48 hours once. I had about 250 views. Like 5 comments. I took them down, because I felt people were only looking at my nudes.

I was view 197  hehe~

Huynh Photography wrote:
So we're basically a bunch of perverts in disguise as photographer.

No, the perverts are the ones who feel all icky and dirty when they see a nude human body then try to make everyone else ashamed of it by calling them perverts.  Most of us are just grown up people who've come to terms with the concept that the human body is beautiful.