Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
This comes up ALL the time... Slender girls being bashed by "curvy" girls... as if the slender and athletic types are something unreal, and made out to be "stick figures". This maybe too much of a personal view, but I consider a girl "curvy" when she is slender, has perky round b-cup breasts (curve #1), athletic latissimus that goes into a narrow waist (curve #2) and outwards to a round hip (curve #3) with a round and firm buttock (curve #4), then athletic thighs with toned legs tapering down to narrow ankles. But... that's MY definition of curvy. Other peoples definition maybe flabby arms, rolls under the arms, belly rolls, muffin tops and big thighs with a big shapeless buttock. I am sure some people will flame me for this, or think that I am attacking big girls..., but no, I don't mean that... I attack the terminology, because, frankly, it just gets on my friggin nerves when models I am working with or girls I am friends with, or girls I am dating who are slender and curvy are simply being insulted by the "curvy girls brigade"... If you are one of those, why don't you make the simple distinction of calling yourself "curvier" girls, because you have some more rolls. There is nothing wrong with it, according to a recent statistic I have seen on the news in reference to the Madrid Idiocy, the average American girl is 5'4" and 143 lbs... wondering if KFC, McD and the King have anything to do with it... Just stop denying that slender girls can have fantastic curves in the right places... End of rant
Model
Mz Machina
Posts: 1754
Chicago, Illinois, US
I am not sure exactly what i am , and haven't much time to decide an a label or category to shove myself in. Considering I dont like labels or categories , I guess i will just keep shooting with people who want to shoot with me. LOL.
Model
Kaitlin Lara
Posts: 6467
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
I may not have the booby curves...but a 23 inch waist and 33 inch hips...you can't deny that's a curve...thank you UdoR...it's nice to see someone actually sticking up for us skinny gals. I may be skinny...but with a big ol' ass like mine...you cannot call me a stick. BTW...I agree with you...if you're 50 inches the whole way down you're just as stick shaped as someone who's 25 inches the whole way down. You don't have to be thick to be curvy.
Model
MelissaLynnette LaDiva
Posts: 50816
Leawood, Kansas, US
Someone recently dubbed me "coke bottle shaped". It was an eye opener. But on topic, the girls who usually want to be referred to as curvy most times should be called chubby. This also applies to girls who refer to themselves as thick when they should be called fat. To me thick is Beyonce, Melyssa Ford, etc. Toned bodies that are larger but well proportioned and nice to look at and envy.
Model
Just AJ
Posts: 3478
Round Rock, Texas, US
Melissa Lynnette wrote: Someone recently dubbed me "coke bottle shaped". It was an eye opener. But on topic, the girls who usually want to be referred to as curvy most times should be called chubby. This also applies to girls who refer to themselves as thick when they should be called fat. To me thick is Beyonce, Melyssa Ford, etc. Toned bodies that are larger but well proportioned and nice to look at and envy. Finally! Someone who knows the difference!!
Model
Just AJ
Posts: 3478
Round Rock, Texas, US
UdoR wrote: wondering if KFC, McD and the King have anything to do with it This isn't insulting?? Not all "meatier" bodied folk scarf fast food Udo. I know that's not your "quarrel" but. . .why must poor diet and lack of exercise constantly flow from your fingertips when describing individuals that are more flesh endowed? If your beef (no pun intended) is with people misjudging the slender. . .let's not follow suit and misjudge the heavier.
Model
MelissaLynnette LaDiva
Posts: 50816
Leawood, Kansas, US
Jayne Jones wrote:
Finally! Someone who knows the difference!! Of course I know the difference. I've thrown that in some people's faces before.
Photographer
Tzalam
Posts: 548
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
I agree with the OP's definition of curves it has nothing to do with weight or size it's relationships of hips to waist and chest curves are good
Model
Sarah Deathriage
Posts: 166
Phoenix, Arizona, US
oh jesus..not this again.
Model
Wynd Mulysa
Posts: 8619
Berkeley, California, US
What category do girls like Kaitlin and myself, who don't have the "booby curves" but have the hip curves, fall into? ..Just wondering.
Photographer
Tog
Posts: 55204
Birmingham, Alabama, US
Wynd Mulysa wrote: What category do girls like Kaitlin and myself, who don't have the "booby curves" but have the hip curves, fall into? ..Just wondering. The kind I'd like to shoot..?
Model
Rhiannon Rose
Posts: 31
A B cup??? Lol. How is that curvy?? Sorry...just my opinion. I am not going to comment further...I will only end up contradicting myself. I am curvy. Not flabby, and not scrawny. I think your point of view is too skinny...I don't even know where I am going with this. Damn I'm tired. I am such a computer junkie, lol. O.o
Model
Shyly
Posts: 3870
Pasadena, California, US
I don't get it. What's with all the hostility? Seriously. I've been on the receiving end of enormous amounts of crap from thin girls, just like some thin girls have been on the receiving end of enormous amounts of crap from fat girls. Why? Who the fuck cares? I am so over it. Seriously. GET OVER IT!
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
Jayne Jones wrote:
This isn't insulting?? Not all "meatier" bodied folk scarf fast food Udo. I know that's not your "quarrel" but. . .why must poor diet and lack of exercise constantly flow from your fingertips when describing individuals that are more flesh endowed? If your beef (no pun intended) is with people misjudging the slender. . .let's not follow suit and misjudge the heavier. Oh... I am sorry Jayne! I don't mean to put eating habits into the simple equation of "energy in vs. energy out" and deep fried "soul food" (it's called soul food because it sends your soul faster to heaven!) as a cultural food is extremely high in fats! Unless you have a VERY RARE genetic condition or a severe malfunction of your glands in which you gain incredible fatty tissue out of salad while exercising, then there is no excuse for individual obesity. However, there are definite distinctions in body composition and genetic makeup, which tends to have slender athletic people, or bigger people in proportion because their body just retains more bodyfat and I am not denying that, but... PLEASE, don't tell me that a big "boned" (I soo hate that bullshit expression!) is big boned because of a healthy diet. A girl, being all T&A and in proportions with a few "extra" pounds can certainly be healthy, attractive and a knockout..., yet, if there are more jelly rolls on the body... then it's for certain a matter of "energy in" (food and calories) vs. "energy out" (caloric expenditure such as metabolism and physical demands) and as much as I like you Jayne, you just don't have a concept of health and nutrition. I am willing to discuss those concepts with your physician and I can guarantee you that he/she will agree with what I have to say after I finished my discussion with him/her. It's not the first time that I educate physicians about matters of nutrition...
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
Model
Just AJ
Posts: 3478
Round Rock, Texas, US
Rhiannon Rose wrote: A B cup??? Lol. How is that curvy?? Some B cups are close to C cups. . .so in THAT sense. . .they are indeed bountiful. Even a small B compared to a AA cup would be curvy. Let's not be closed minded about breasts.
Model
Wynd Mulysa
Posts: 8619
Berkeley, California, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
The kind I'd like to shoot..? Sweet! [You know, I'll be in San Diego next month..]
Photographer
PK Digital Imaging
Posts: 3084
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Wynd Mulysa wrote: What category do girls like Kaitlin and myself, who don't have the "booby curves" but have the hip curves, fall into? ..Just wondering. You fall into the MBCBSKAM... Chapter 7.. paragraph 8 subsection 1-A of PK Digital Imaging guide to model types. Chapter 7 - Body Types Paragraph 8: In reference to said body types in which curves and natural proportion seem to be lacking but the ability of a model to perform is not hindered by any means may fall into one of the following categories: 1-A) MBCBSKAM (Missing Boob Curve But Still a Kick Ass Model) 1-B)... -PKD p.s. But what do I know
Photographer
Tog
Posts: 55204
Birmingham, Alabama, US
Wynd Mulysa wrote:
Sweet! [You know, I'll be in San Diego next month..] I know.. You're staying with one of my closest friends..
Model
Rhiannon Rose
Posts: 31
Jayne Jones wrote:
Some B cups are close to C cups. . .so in THAT sense. . .they are indeed bountiful. Even a small B compared to a AA cup would be curvy. Let's not be closed minded about breasts. I didn't mean to make it sound like that. Sorry. I was a b cup for a while, I just never saw it as curvy is all. Not to myself.
Photographer
Christopher N.
Posts: 657
Troy, Michigan, US
If a photographer doesn't step out of his or her box and works with women bigger than size 0 he (or she) is either closed minded, scared or no good. Could say the same about tats....but that's another story.....
Model
Wynd Mulysa
Posts: 8619
Berkeley, California, US
Shyly wrote: I don't get it. What's with all the hostility? Seriously. I've been on the receiving end of enormous amounts of crap from thin girls, just like some thin girls have been on the receiving end of enormous amounts of crap from fat girls. Why? Who the fuck cares? I am so over it. Seriously. GET OVER IT! Shyly is the coolest ever. And now I feel guilty for participating in this thread. :0/. But I can't help it! I'm a MM addict. It doesn't matter what the thread is about.. Odds are I'll respond.
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
Shyly wrote: I don't get it. What's with all the hostility? Seriously. I've been on the receiving end of enormous amounts of crap from thin girls, just like some thin girls have been on the receiving end of enormous amounts of crap from fat girls. Why? Who the fuck cares? I am so over it. Seriously. GET OVER IT! Shyly; I hope you know that I am fighting against the hostility against slender girls and not against "big" girls... but I am sure YOU know what I am talking about, since we have been discussing this for a long time already! P.S.: Why are you not in NYC??? I thought you've planned your trip up here months ago and that we can finally shoot together.
Model
Wynd Mulysa
Posts: 8619
Berkeley, California, US
PK Digital Imaging wrote:
You fall into the MBCBSKAM... Chapter 7.. paragraph 8 subsection 1-A of PK Digital Imaging guide to model types. Chapter 7 - Body Types Paragraph 8: In reference to said body types in which curves and natural proportion seem to be lacking but the ability of a model to perform is not hindered by any means may fall into one of the following categories: 1-A) MBCBSKAM (Missing Boob Curve But Still a Kick Ass Model) 1-B)... -PKD p.s. But what do I know This actually made me laugh.. A lot. Thanks.
Model
Wynd Mulysa
Posts: 8619
Berkeley, California, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
I know.. You're staying with one of my closest friends.. . I'm very excited about it.
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
Christopher N. wrote: If a photographer doesn't step out of his or her box and works with women bigger than size 0 he (or she) is either closed minded, scared or no good. Could say the same about tats....but that's another story..... I don't remember ever having shot a size 0 model, size 1, YES, size 12, yes... but I know size 0 models who have awsome bodies (Ever heard of Nerlande?)! I think that the "box" includes every size... Just stop the friggin' bashing of the models on the other end of the weight scale... That is what my rant is about Christopher!
Model
Just AJ
Posts: 3478
Round Rock, Texas, US
UdoR wrote: Double Post! I'm sorry Udo. . .I forgot you were a licensed dietitian. I may not be the "perfect picture" of health. . .but from the nutrition class I took. . .depending upon how you metabolize food. . .vegetarians can also be obese. Not even going to talk about how much "natural sugar" there is in fruit. And if you eat enough veggies and don't expend the calories from those veggies out. . .that would put you into the same "calories in vs calories out" scenario that you speak of. I'm merely stating that one shouldn't gaze upon someone and say "hmmm. . .she's portly. . .wonder how many trips to fast food restaurants she makes". If you aren't adult enough to acknowledge that is stereotypical. . .for the same reason as it is wrong to look at a muscle bound man and say "boy. . .he sure is built. . .wonder what steroids he's taking". . .then that's perfectly fine and your prejudiced opinion. I'm not even going to touch the "soul food" comment.
Photographer
ChrisCorbettPhotography
Posts: 252
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, US
Sarah Deathriage wrote: oh jesus..not this again. Yes, sweeeet Je-sus-uh, this again. btw, do you require an escort?? If so, why?
Model
Sarah Deathriage
Posts: 166
Phoenix, Arizona, US
Udor! what the hell is this crap about "soul food" comment towards Jayne? now you just sound crazy. That doesn't come across very politically correct if you ask me. But I guess this entire post can be filed under Udor is not PC.
Photographer
RayAndrews
Posts: 321
Dallas, Texas, US
Give me curves
Model
Sarah Deathriage
Posts: 166
Phoenix, Arizona, US
ChrisCorbettPhotography wrote:
Yes, sweeeet Je-sus-uh, this again. btw, do you require an escort?? If so, why? this is off topic, but no I don't.
Model
Just AJ
Posts: 3478
Round Rock, Texas, US
Sarah Deathriage wrote: Udor! what the hell is this crap about "soul food" comment towards Jayne? now you just sound crazy. That doesn't come across very politically correct if you ask me. But I guess this entire post can be filed under Udor is not PC. Sarah he was just trying to be funny. I agree with him that it is very wrong for people to pick on slender folk. Just as it is to pick on not so slender folk. But Udo has an uncanny knack for assuming things when it comes to not so slender folk. . .which boils down to the pot calling the kettle black IMO. Two wrongs don't make a right. Shyly has tried to get him to stop assuming people's lifestyles based on their appearance many times. I honestly don't know why I even bothered to make the same plea. . .clearly he has never listened to her and she is far more reputable and known than I.
Photographer
Christopher N.
Posts: 657
Troy, Michigan, US
UdoR wrote: I don't remember ever having shot a size 0 model, size 1, YES, size 12, yes... but I know size 0 models who have awsome bodies (Ever heard of Nerlande?)! I think that the "box" includes every size... Just stop the friggin' bashing of the models on the other end of the weight scale... That is what my rant is about Christopher! I agree UdoR....sometimes something gets lost in translation in a message post :-) I've just heard alot of stories from the models I've worked with.....of all sizes. And yes, believe me just as there are size 12 models who are 'da bomb' there are size 0s. I can only speak from my relatively novice (5 years) experience on this one. I've been fortunate to work with ALOT of different types of models. Slim, curvy....makes me better.....
Model
Wynd Mulysa
Posts: 8619
Berkeley, California, US
Jayne Jones wrote: I'm sorry Udo. . .I forgot you were a licensed dietitian. I may not be the "perfect picture" of health. . .but from the nutrition class I took. . .depending upon how you metabolize food. . .vegetarians can also be obese. And if you eat enough veggies and don't expend the calories from those veggies out. . .that would put you into the same "calories in vs calories out" scenario that you speak of. I'm merely stating that one shouldn't gaze upon someone and say "hmmm. . .she's portly. . .wonder how many trips to fast food restaurants she makes". If you aren't adult enough to acknowledge that is stereotypical. . .for the same reason as it is wrong to look at a muscle bound man and say "boy. . .he sure is built. . .wonder what steroids he's taking". . .then that's perfectly fine and your prejudiced opinion. I'm not even going to touch the "soul food" comment. The whole point is that overweight people are, part of the time, unhealthy because of their diet. Underweight people are also, part of the time, unhealthy because of their diet. That's why there is the "average weight" idea. But it's taken a little too seriously and shoved down our throats through a lot of media and people who live by that media, making a lot of people insecure or giving them false ideas. I wouldn't say that just because someone is the "correct weight" for their size, they are of perfect health. People are also underweight or overweight because of genetics. I would go so far as to guess that someone who eats too much of the wrong things or too little of the right things can maintain a "healthy weight" because of their metabolism as well. Anyway, I'm not sure of the statistics, but it's possible to be healthy and not be the suggested weight for your age/height, and it's also possible to be that way because of a poor diet. Someone find out the statistics for us, please.
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
Jayne Jones wrote: I'm sorry Udo. . .I forgot you were a licensed dietitian. Dear Jayne; Could you please point me to the reference where I EVER made a reference to being a licensed "dietician"! Would appreciate it! Regardless, I am concerned with nutritional health for nearly a quarter of a century with intense study of the subject, also being a high performance athlete for 30 years and personal trainer and coach in full contact martial arts (as well as having been a vegetarian for 24 years). With that background, I do have an extensive knowledge and after having had serious discussions with several physicians who agreed with me after I provided them with facts I had access to I am secure enough in my live long knowledge to discuss that matter with your personal physician. If you want, I'll email you my phone number and have a talk with your doc... free of charge! Then he/she will tell you what the deal is! I am serious, simply because I know what I am talking about!
Model
Michelle Renee
Posts: 1073
Los Angeles, California, US
I am in complete agreement with what you wrote, I think curve is about bust-waist-hip differentials, and you can be pretty much any size to have the potential to be "curvy," if you have an hourglass type figure. I am one of those larger sized curvy girls, though the majority of my curve is found on the top rather than the bottom. I will never bash thin models, or thin women because they are not like me, nor do I think that everyone who is fat is curvy, and blah, blah, blah. I think there is beauty in many things and many people, and much of what I think is beautiful may not always be the most obvious. I really do not understand the reasoning behind bashing anyone about anything. To each his own, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder and whatever other cliche you can think of. But yeah, I think a size 2 can have curves and so can a size 16. (me, lol.)
Photographer
Jay Edwards
Posts: 18616
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US
Sarah Deathriage wrote: Udor! what the hell is this crap about "soul food" comment towards Jayne? now you just sound crazy. That doesn't come across very politically correct if you ask me. But I guess this entire post can be filed under Udor is not PC. Uh-oh...so we have to be politically correct here?
Photographer
ChrisCorbettPhotography
Posts: 252
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, US
Sarah Deathriage wrote:
this is off topic, but no I don't. Sorry, a lame attempt at an off topic joke.
Model
Just AJ
Posts: 3478
Round Rock, Texas, US
Wynd Mulysa wrote: The whole point is that overweight people are, part of the time, unhealthy because of their diet. Underweight people are also, part of the time, unhealthy because of their diet. That's why there is the "average weight" idea. But it's taken a little too seriously and shoved down our throats through a lot of media and people who live by that media, making a lot of people insecure. I wouldn't say that just because someone is the "correct weight" for their size, they are of perfect health. People are also underweight or overweight because of genetics. I would go so far as to guess that someone who eats too much of the wrong things or too little of the right things can maintain a "healthy weight" because of their metabolism as well. Anyway, I'm not sure of the statistics, but it's possible to be healthy and not be the suggested weight for your age/height, and it's also possible to be that way because of a poor diet. Someone find out the statistics for us, please. I agree with everything you've said. . .I just thought that the point of his post was that people were picking on the slender models and calling them curvaceously challenged. So for him to say what he said about fat people was just as insulting. That's the point I was trying to make. The CDC says that America is vastly overweight due to "inactivity and sedentary lifestyles" not diet. NOT that diet doesn't play a role in the whole scheme of things, because it does. . .but there are just as many skinny people in lines at these fast food giants as there are fat people. . .and THAT fact shouldn't be overlooked. Us big folk don't own any more stock in fast food than slim folk.
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
Sarah Deathriage wrote: Udor! what the hell is this crap about "soul food" comment towards Jayne? now you just sound crazy. That doesn't come across very politically correct if you ask me. But I guess this entire post can be filed under Udor is not PC. Hey Sarah; As someone who lives among people who enjoy "soul food", as someone who was married to one Jamaican and one AA woman with close contact to the rest of the families and not caring about the ethnicity of someone I love... I will not get into any "PC" bullcrap with you, since you don't know the platform I am speaking from... K!
|