Photographer
Legacys 7
Posts: 33899
San Francisco, California, US
Vance wrote:
Madona trains hard..and for her age and condition she looks amazing. Yes the leaner body tends to have a harder look, but it's better than being loose and sloppy. There is a trade off as we age. For women this is VERY true. Genetics is key, but this woman has certainly taken great care of herself. Rockin' never stated anything else except that she has that nut cracker look. that's all.
Photographer
Legacys 7
Posts: 33899
San Francisco, California, US
_Cinnamon_ wrote:
Just speaking from experience. Check out Pixel Fisher's post near the beginning of this PS thread: https://www.modelmayhem.com/posts.php?thread_id=64019 Even though it's all just fun, they're very careful about only photoshopping images with the photographer's permission. I'm one of them.
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
_Cinnamon_ wrote:
Just speaking from experience. Check out Pixel Fisher's post near the beginning of this PS thread: https://www.modelmayhem.com/posts.php?thread_id=64019 Even though it's all just fun, they're very careful about only photoshopping images with the photographer's permission. Yeah..As it states..MM can not be held liable and we are on our own. This is not an instance where anything major is going to happen. Trust me... I will simply leaver the link. No need for a few more posting to occur and the mods get involved. Just heading off the crap before it happens as things get way to blown out of wack at times. V
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
Legacys 7 wrote:
never stated anything else except that she has that nut cracker look. that's all. I wasnt being criticle of your comment...FYI..:-)
Photographer
Wandering Bohemian
Posts: 213
Marion, North Carolina, US
Then there's THIS juicy jem I found for a new Max Factor make-up ad. (& I hope I'm doing this right for the pic to show up) which Max Factor went ahead & 'fixed' a bit for her: ![https://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h225/WanderingBohemian/modonnatouched.jpg]()
Photographer
Kentsoul
Posts: 9739
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US
Vance wrote: Ok, I could'nt resist.. I hate when people retouch my images...so let the karma begin. I just wanted to mess around with a maddona picture.. Just to see how far I could bring it..granted..it was a 72 DPI image. I could have done more, but I think I heard KARMA knocking at my door! Just having a little fun, as I dare not suggest I am on par with the team that handles this pop icons image and images. A retouch with respect.. I removed the post and just leaving the link. So as not to get MM in a JAM. Dont wanna piss off the Powers that be! http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c389/ … donna1.jpg Nothing against your retouch skills, but I prefer the original...It's how she really looks, which I find much more intriguing. But then, I'm a perv and a wierdo so nevermind what I think.
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
Melvin Moten Jr wrote:
Nothing against your retouch skills, but I prefer the original...It's how she really looks, which I find much more intriguing. But then, I'm a perv and a wierdo so nevermind what I think. Hey, No worries.. I wonder thoough..Which image would get published...the untoched Madonna or the retouched Madonna? Not meaning MY retouch..
Photographer
Legacys 7
Posts: 33899
San Francisco, California, US
Wandering Bohemian wrote: Then there's THIS juicy jem I found for a new Max Factor make-up ad. (& I hope I'm doing this right for the pic to show up)
which Max Factor went ahead & 'fixed' a bit for her:
![https://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h225/WanderingBohemian/modonnatouched.jpg]() A bit?
Model
_Cinnamon_
Posts: 1697
San Francisco, California, US
Vance wrote:
Yeah..As it states..MM can not be held liable and we are on our own. This is not an instance where anything major is going to happen. Trust me... I will simply leaver the link. No need for a few more posting to occur and the mods get involved. Just heading off the crap before it happens as things get way to blown out of wack at times. No big deal. I wasn't expecting the mods to get involved. Just thought some uptight photographers might give you grief.
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
_Cinnamon_ wrote:
No big deal. I wasn't expecting the mods to get involved. Just thought some uptight photographers might give you grief. As a photgrapher I wouldnt give anybody grief in the context of this thread. It obvious that people are reposting this mans images in the thread. That is no threat to his business in anyway. If the image were used or posted for profit or misrepresentation then of cource I would expect some grief. This situation is a low profile event. V
Photographer
glitterguru
Posts: 255
Valencia, California, US
Wow....very cool to see them in their original state...I have to say I think they look much better than I expected... the ones of her flipping her hair are bad...but you all know you have to take a MILLION of those kind of moving, flippping shots to get a good one... and the ones on the floor in the red dress....look fab.... Suprising.... GG
Photographer
Incident Image
Posts: 342
Los Angeles, California, US
i guess the link doesnt work anymore, it just goes straight to Google for me...
Photographer
Click Hamilton
Posts: 36555
San Diego, California, US
_Cinnamon_ wrote:
You're right about that. Looking at her ass and legs, I felt fear. ...when you stare persistently into an abyss, the abyss also stares into you
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
Click Hamilton wrote:
...when you stare persistently into an abyss, the abyss also stares into you When I look at her ass and legs, FEAR is the last thing on my mind...YUM!
Photographer
Attractive Portraits
Posts: 209
London, England, United Kingdom
Did someone shout 'ebay'? ![wink](//assets.modelmayhem.com/images/smilies/wink.png)
Photographer
Robert Randall
Posts: 13890
Chicago, Illinois, US
![](//assets.modelmayhem.com/images/vip.png)
Wandering Bohemian wrote: Then there's THIS juicy jem I found for a new Max Factor make-up ad. (& I hope I'm doing this right for the pic to show up)
which Max Factor went ahead & 'fixed' a bit for her:
![https://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h225/WanderingBohemian/modonnatouched.jpg]() Not very flattering position on the main light given the camera angle. Hard light is difficult enough on people when it's put in a good position. I suggest a young model wouldn't have looked much better.
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
Bob Randall Photography wrote:
Not very flattering position on the main light given the camera angle. Hard light is difficult enough on people when it's put in a good position. I suggest a young model wouldn't have looked much better. One would think all of these images were taken KNOWING a pre-thought out plan of retouching was in order. I've set up shots knowing the in camera look was going to be follwed by a specifix retouch, thus the lighting was set up a certain way to facilitate the retouch and final product.
Photographer
MRP-Photography
Posts: 816
Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Wandering Bohemian wrote: Then there's THIS juicy jem I found for a new Max Factor make-up ad. (& I hope I'm doing this right for the pic to show up)
which Max Factor went ahead & 'fixed' a bit for her:
![https://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h225/WanderingBohemian/modonnatouched.jpg]() Uuuuaaah! she looks like my mom (shes 74) I've seen some unedited headshots before, she is an old ugly bat! Time for her to leave the stage, I don't like her music anyway.
|