Forums > General Industry > Is onemodelplace worth it?

Photographer

j-shooter

Posts: 1912

San Francisco, California, US

Just wanted to hear from models and photographers, et al. It seems like the minimum amount is $10 a month (hard to figure even that out, so complicated).

Is it worth it to you, and why/how?

Jun 02 06 01:43 pm Link

Model

Claire Elizabeth

Posts: 1550

Exton, Pennsylvania, US

Im a platinum member but I get a lot of paid work from there so it pays for itself.

Jun 02 06 01:45 pm Link

Model

Carrie_K

Posts: 10053

Orlando, Florida, US

I had a paid membership and didn't get much of anything from it. I make way more contacts here. I also find modelplace.com to better.

Jun 02 06 01:47 pm Link

Photographer

Mike Cummings

Posts: 5896

LAKE COMO, Florida, US

MM is the best.

Jun 02 06 01:48 pm Link

Photographer

j-shooter

Posts: 1912

San Francisco, California, US

Cary, that's good to hear.

It's also good that other make contacts there as well.

If I can ever find their pricing page again thru their maze of a site, I'll look at the different levels.

Anyone else find benefit?

Jun 02 06 01:50 pm Link

Photographer

Done and Gone

Posts: 7650

Chiredzi, Masvingo, Zimbabwe

I thought they were very lacking in Customer Service Skills and downright rude to boot. The transition for photographers from free page with access to some services to photographer page is paid only was done very clumsily and caused me to bail on them. I like it much better here on Model Mayhem!!

Jun 02 06 01:52 pm Link

Photographer

Sophistocles

Posts: 21320

Seattle, Washington, US

If you have a strong portfolio, the first few months are worth it, in my opinion. Especially if you have something to offer novice models, you can get a lot of trade shoots.

Casting for paid work (as in I have a client who is paying, and I'm trying to find models) is like pulling teeth. Not worth it anywhere. Not even here. I still have an open call for paid work and can't find appropriate models, there, here, or anywhere.

Jun 02 06 01:52 pm Link

Photographer

Mark Brummitt

Posts: 40527

Clarkston, Michigan, US

I'm a platinum member and I get about 1 request a month as opposed to 4 to five a month on MM.  I have been considering dropping OMP for some time now.

Jun 02 06 01:52 pm Link

Photographer

TBJ Imaging

Posts: 2416

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, US

I was a platinum member for over a year....just cancelled my membership with them 2 days ago and removed my entire portfolio. when I was looking for TFP work it was ok....sometimes.....but now that I am doing paid assignments I have no need for it. I just need one place to show people my work. I am happy that I said goodbye to OMP

Jun 02 06 01:53 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

Just a quick reminder: no bashing other portfolio sites.  Discussion is fine, but bashing will result in this thread being closed.

Thanks,
BD, MM Moderator

Jun 02 06 01:53 pm Link

Model

Jenia

Posts: 276

Washington, Arkansas, US

I think they should consider opening up the castings to all users.... It would make the forum more valuable for both models & clients, no?

Jun 02 06 01:59 pm Link

Photographer

R Michael Walker

Posts: 11987

Costa Mesa, California, US

I was on OMP for 5 years. I JUST dropped my Plat plus membershio with them. Pricey, a LOT of Porn models (I do mostly art nudes so I probably had more of those contacts than the adverage photographer there to be honest), TONS of hits there as opposed to here but actually no more models than I'm getting here. That used to not be true but over the past year the number of models with a web cam portfolio, underage models an porn girls overpowered the art models. And there ther is the wave of 5"5" (or LESS) "fashion models". But that's here too???? So After years of great service and great returns, last year was crapppy so I dumpped them. MM has it's problems with searches and referrals that were better on OMP but the price is way better (Even paid memberships are much less..at least now). PS as a photographer on OMP you need to be Gold or better to do well with showcasing, models etc. And it's not till Plat you can kill the obnoxious ad banners on your profile.
Mike

Jun 02 06 02:01 pm Link

Photographer

Mickle Design Werks

Posts: 5967

Washington, District of Columbia, US

I'll likely give it up after my membership comes due in September.  I’m just not seeing the ROI for the money paid.

I do like the site but I get more models through MM than OMP.

What I do I like about OMP?

- The search page is robust.
- Models and Photographers have to check off genre categories that they shoot (i.e. nude work) which is helpful in determining who to contact and who not to contact
- Showcase images. I'm not a fan of how they are selected (very subjective) but they do drive models to me for work.
- new model notifications

I hoping that with the paid membership that MM will incorporate some of these feature so it will be a no-brainer decision come September.

Jun 02 06 02:02 pm Link

Model

Lapis

Posts: 8424

Chicago, Illinois, US

As a model, OMP has provided me with more paid work, and the travel notices are great.
MM is good to meet artists, but not as good to pay the bills. Have met some great artists as well as paying clients on omp.

Jun 02 06 02:03 pm Link

Photographer

Chris Photography

Posts: 1070

Valrico, Florida, US

I was a silver member for 3 years, and finally let it expire.  I didn't get very much work from the site, and what hits I did get were from models with cell phone photos on their pages looking for $300 an hour with a four hour minimum.
I like this site much better it has a more relaxed, friendly feel.

Jun 02 06 02:08 pm Link

Model

Jay Dezelic

Posts: 5029

Seattle, Washington, US

I joined OMP about 5 months ago as a non-paid member and had just one request for a paid shoot.  For a while, I tried contacting photogs who were traveling to my area but never had a response.  OMP is good about getting travel notices out. However, it's kind of difficult to communicate through their system since they flitter out URLs or any references to other sites.  I have not been compelled to sign up for a paid membership.

Jun 02 06 02:08 pm Link

Photographer

Sophistocles

Posts: 21320

Seattle, Washington, US

Jay Dezelic wrote:
However, it's kind of difficult to communicate through their system since they flitter out URLs or any references to other sites.  I have not been compelled to sign up for a paid membership.

Not in you have a platinum or greater account. If you do, you can have URLs in your profile as well as in mail.

Jun 02 06 02:10 pm Link

Photographer

Mark Brummitt

Posts: 40527

Clarkston, Michigan, US

Christopher Ambler wrote:

Not in you have a platinum or greater account. If you do, you can have URLs in your profile as well as in mail.

Christopher, I am a Plat member at OMP and I cannot put the MM URL in my profile.

Jun 02 06 02:14 pm Link

Model

Victoria Elle

Posts: 688

New York, New York, US

OMP was not worth it for me, simply because I found the site so difficult to navigate.  However, someone more computer savvy than me might not have the same problem.  Short answer: it depends.

Jun 02 06 02:15 pm Link

Photographer

Sophistocles

Posts: 21320

Seattle, Washington, US

markcomp wrote:

Christopher, I am a Plat member at OMP and I cannot put the MM URL in my profile.

http://www.onemodelplace.com/photograph … _ID=168040 is me - you'll see plenty of URLs in my profile. Perhaps they're specifically filtering MM? That wouldn't surprise me.

Jun 02 06 02:18 pm Link

Photographer

Bryan Regan Photography

Posts: 137

Raleigh, North Carolina, US

I've had more flakes and no shows from OMP. MM is the best place for me.

Jun 02 06 02:19 pm Link

Photographer

Mark Brummitt

Posts: 40527

Clarkston, Michigan, US

Christopher Ambler wrote:

http://www.onemodelplace.com/photograph … _ID=168040 is me - you'll see plenty of URLs in my profile. Perhaps they're specifically filtering MM? That wouldn't surprise me.

That must be it because my personal web site is not filtered.

Jun 02 06 02:20 pm Link

Photographer

Eros Artist Photography

Posts: 1562

Green Cove Springs, Florida, US

Cary K wrote:
I had a paid membership and didn't get much of anything from it. I make way more contacts here. I also find modelplace.com to better.

Ditto - I'll probably not renew after this year.....

Jun 02 06 02:22 pm Link

Photographer

Mark Brummitt

Posts: 40527

Clarkston, Michigan, US

VikyL wrote:
OMP was not worth it for me, simply because I found the site so difficult to navigate.  However, someone more computer savvy than me might not have the same problem.  Short answer: it depends.

I have a terrible time with the OMP search feature.  It often logs me off.  I like the idea behind it though with all the individual selections in choosing a model.

Jun 02 06 02:22 pm Link

Photographer

Rp-photo

Posts: 42711

Houston, Texas, US

I am very disappointed with OMP. When I first joined as a rank newbie photographer, I lined up several good shoots with good, experienced models. After a few months, nothing more came from it, even though my work continually improved.

Lowly bronze / beginner members are buried low in the pecking order and made difficult to find. The initial success was due to "new photographer" messages sent to model members.

I have shot with many MM models that are also on OMP. Most don't even bother to leave a "worked with"!

For me, MM clearly rules with Model Place an up-and-coming second. Model Crystal Darden (see recent portfolio images) was my first model to be arranged through Model Place. Only after the shoot did I know she was also on MM.

Jun 02 06 02:23 pm Link

Photographer

Eros Artist Photography

Posts: 1562

Green Cove Springs, Florida, US

Something else I remembered about OMP that I found to be bothersome........

A few months back, I was responding to a "public acknowledgement" - one of the "desire to work with" comments. In my message back to the model, I mentioned that I maintained portfolios on MuseCube, MM, MP, etc., where she could see other work not shown in the OMP port. I did this because my website was in its re-build phase at the time and was not running.

I got an auto-generated response message from the OMP servers that said the "message could not/would not be sent until all references to MuseCube were removed" - it may have mentioned other sites as well.

Jun 02 06 02:35 pm Link

Photographer

VRG Photography

Posts: 1025

Tallahassee, Florida, US

I'm a Platinum member there, and because I'm on the go a lot, the travel notices are very helpful for me, as well as when models are coming my way.

The other thing that's good is that they do a better job of protecting your images on the site. Not that you CAN'T get the pictures through some other ways than right-clicking, etc., but it's not as easy as being on other sites.

I'm all for using as many venues possible to network. As long as it's doing the trick for me, I'm going to keep using it, and others.

Jun 02 06 02:36 pm Link

Model

Claire Elizabeth

Posts: 1550

Exton, Pennsylvania, US

markcomp wrote:

That must be it because my personal web site is not filtered.

They don't allow any mention of MM. I asked someone who works there because I had a sentence in my profile saying to view my model mayhem page that kept getting deleted. Not that it just says "My MM# is...." it is ok.

Jun 02 06 02:37 pm Link

Photographer

Timekeeper Photography

Posts: 83

Portland, Oregon, US

OMP was great in its time, but times change. I get as much work here as I ever did there.

Jun 02 06 02:37 pm Link

Model

A BRITT PRO-AM

Posts: 7840

CARDIFF BY THE SEA, California, US

Lapis wrote:
As a model, OMP has provided me with more paid work, and the travel notices are great.
MM is good to meet artists, but not as good to pay the bills. Have met some great artists as well as paying clients on omp.

me too, I agree exactly
even though I am not on league of Lapis!

travel notices vital for me..
& have had almost exclusively TFP offers from MM

also you cant just take down the pics off OMP
unless you know what you are doing
so as well as being a bigger port
my nudes, showing more etc are on there, not here

But the forums are addictive!
only forums I have contributed too...
yet so time consuming !!

Jun 02 06 02:38 pm Link

Model

Wynd Mulysa

Posts: 8619

Berkeley, California, US

I only have five photos there, because I can't afford a better membership.  I don't get many refferals from there because of that.  My schedule is pretty much full until July, and that's all from MM.  :0).
I don't like it.  I never update things.
Once, I sent a photographer who expressed interest in working with me a message through OMP, and tried to include my MM URL so he could see more photos, and they deleted the whole message because it's apparently against the rules to send someone a link to a better portfolio.  Jerks.
I had to rewrite the whole thing, and I still gave him my ID#.  That photographer signed up for a MM account when he got my message.

*Edit. New information added.

Jun 02 06 02:40 pm Link

Photographer

Rp-photo

Posts: 42711

Houston, Texas, US

Wynd Mulysa wrote:
I only have five photos there, because I can't afford a better membership.
I don't like it.  I never update things.
Once, I sent a photographer who expressed interest in working with me a message through OMP, and tried to include my MM URL so he could see more photos, and they deleted the whole message because it's apparently against the rules to send someone a link to a better portfolio.  Jerks.
I had to rewrite the whole thing, and I still gave him my ID#.  That photographer signed up for a MM account when he got my message.

That is type of behaviour expected from someone in a position of power that fears losing it to a superior underling.

Jun 02 06 02:43 pm Link

Model

Tikeya

Posts: 8075

Edgewood, Maryland, US

I've been asking myself the same question.  I'm a Silver Level member on OMP, but I had downgraded to the Bronze Level (which is free), but then when a photographer friend of mine had told me about the swimsuit competition, I wanted to give it a shot (not just that, but also other future contests I may qualify for) so I upgraded back to Silver Level.  It doesn't even bother me to not win OMP contests.  It just feels good knowing that I gave it a shot and did have some people support me by voting.  Also I like receiving the OMP casting call e-mails and the photographer travel notifications.  If it wasn't for the travel notifications, I probably wouldn't have known that Marc Mauro (of QuestionMarc in New York) is coming to Maryland.  smile  OMP is cool, but if I had to choose between it and MM, I'd definitely go with MM.  For a while now people have been suggesting that I join MM, and I'm glad that I finally did.  I love the features of this site, and the people, for the most part, are real cool.  smile  As you can see, I'm addicted to the forums...lol.

Jun 02 06 02:46 pm Link

Model

AnToNiA BaKaLoVa

Posts: 50

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Jenia wrote:
I think they should consider opening up the castings to all users.... It would make the forum more valuable for both models & clients, no?

I agree, I'm on OMP but have a free account and there is a fashion show casting here for Atlanta but unfortunately I can't see the info sad
Otherwise, I also prefer MM.

Any of you tried Premier Models??

Jun 02 06 02:46 pm Link

Photographer

Joe Koz

Posts: 1981

Lititz, Pennsylvania, US

Mike Walker wrote:
I was on OMP for 5 years. I JUST dropped my Plat plus membershio with them. Pricey, a LOT of Porn models (I do mostly art nudes so I probably had more of those contacts than the adverage photographer there to be honest), TONS of hits there as opposed to here but actually no more models than I'm getting here. That used to not be true but over the past year the number of models with a web cam portfolio, underage models an porn girls overpowered the art models. And there ther is the wave of 5"5" (or LESS) "fashion models". But that's here too???? So After years of great service and great returns, last year was crapppy so I dumpped them. MM has it's problems with searches and referrals that were better on OMP but the price is way better (Even paid memberships are much less..at least now). PS as a photographer on OMP you need to be Gold or better to do well with showcasing, models etc. And it's not till Plat you can kill the obnoxious ad banners on your profile.
Mike

You just listed all the reasons I let my very low number account lapse there just a couple of months ago. Quality is better than quantity ... and they sure have the quantity.

Jun 02 06 02:48 pm Link

Model

Tikeya

Posts: 8075

Edgewood, Maryland, US

Hey, I can look up the casting call info for you and e-mail you the full details, if you'd like.  smile  I often come across some casting calls that may apply to me, so I love getting them sent to my e-mail.  I can go to the casting calls section of the site and look up the ad you're referring to...then I'll send you all the info.

Jun 02 06 02:54 pm Link

Model

elisabeth1986

Posts: 346

Charleston, Arkansas, US

I love omp- to me its definately worth it!

Jun 02 06 02:58 pm Link

Photographer

C R Photography

Posts: 3594

Pleasanton, California, US

MM RULES!..... nuf said big_smile

Jun 02 06 02:58 pm Link

Photographer

Tim Baker-fotoPerfecta

Posts: 9877

Portland, Oregon, US

Michael Longeneker wrote:
I thought they were very lacking in Customer Service Skills and downright rude to boot. The transition for photographers from free page with access to some services to photographer page is paid only was done very clumsily and caused me to bail on them. I like it much better here on Model Mayhem!!

I second that. Rude doesn't begin to describe their lack of Service. /tim

Jun 02 06 02:59 pm Link

Photographer

Infinite Eye

Posts: 300

New York, New York, US

For photographers OMP isn't half as useful.  I was a member of OMP for about five years, but I let my membership lapse this year as the investment wasn't worth the return.  In my entire time on OMP I met about as many new models as in my one year on MM.

For models though, OMP is well worth it.  Paid jobs are common and come from all sorts of sources from individuals to companies.

Jun 02 06 03:06 pm Link