|
Forums >
General Industry >
omg who the hell would let thier kids do this?!?
You ever see some of those beauty pageants that mothers take their daughters to peform in??? Those girls look worse than prostitutes, because they don't even know how to walk or stand; you've got 13-year-olds wearing too much makeup, skin-tight outfits, and wearing high heels. It's kind of weird! I wonder if the mothers are living vicarious alternate existences through their kids, or what. I was out for DEFCON, a computer hackers convention, in Vega$ when they were running a beauty pageant in the same hotel with 2,000 hackers. All these peirced and tattooed weird0s were watching the little girls and shaking their heads. It was kind of trippy. One of my hacker buddies went over to one of the mothers and asked: H: "Can I buy your daughter?" Mom: "WHAT?!" H: "Yeah, can I buy your daughter? I mean, she's dressed up like she's for rent, what do you charge?!" The mom went running out of the room to call for security and everyone laughed their a** off. I don't think mom got the point, though. mjr. Apr 24 06 12:49 pm Link I think we need to see a Dateline expose, what do you think? You know, I remember seeing parents, I think on "Dr. Phil", a few years ago, and they were talking about the pay site that they have set up for their child, showing the same types of photos. Suggestive clothes and poses all the way. I mean, they even had the girl dressing up in a very suggestive fireman's outfit, doing suggestive poses, and posting it on the site! The worst part was that the girl was maybe only 10! Their sick reasoning was something to the effect of "well, we save up the money and it's going to be used for her college fund. We think it's a good way for her to learn about working to earn what you get". It's a typical situation of the parents just wanting to use their child to make money, and it's sick! Apr 24 06 12:58 pm Link Oh my God! I just remembered one of the banners on there, Jessi the Kid.....that's the girl who was on Dr. Phil with her parents! Apr 24 06 01:02 pm Link Marcus J. Ranum wrote: I tip my hat (if I wore one) to that hacker! Apr 24 06 01:03 pm Link Acid-Candy wrote: I'm speechless,these parents are ludacris Apr 24 06 01:06 pm Link Acid-Candy wrote: I'm speechless,these parents are ludacris Apr 24 06 01:06 pm Link I have a daughter and have shot her many times, nothing looking like that. That is sooo inappropriate to shoot young girls like that. I can only imagine WTF kind of asshole would do that. Jeez I just thought of something, if these girls are underage, dont you need to be of age to join these sites cause you need a credit card, i can't believe this. the owners of that site or sites needs to be taken around the back and _______! Let Lefty throw him the Hudson after. Just sick... Apr 24 06 01:15 pm Link THATS SOME SICK SHIT.....................THE PARENTS SHOULD BE SMACKED TO DEATH AND HUNG FROM A TREE AND SET ON FIRE. just my two cents. Apr 24 06 01:16 pm Link Glamour Boulevard wrote: Why are you comparing nudity or adult porn to what's on those pages? You are really scaring me. You really don't get that sick feeling in your stomach looking at those children? These children have no sex drive. Sex doesnât exist to them. They are prepubescent. They donât have the hormones. They are children. They are not aware of sex drive unless they were abused. They were taught to pose that way by sick people. What other purpose could possibly those pictures serve other than pedophile masturbation aids? Apr 24 06 01:29 pm Link I think my heart broke, seeing that. Too sad...what is this world coming to? ::sigh:: Apr 24 06 01:45 pm Link Makes me sad for the fact society has linked sex to beauty so well that even little kids think they have to act "sexy". Apr 24 06 01:50 pm Link This is SAD, this is from their site... What We Do & Don't Do. The basic principle is easy. We take images provided by you the model/photographer/agency and create a website. We do not provide photography services. We promote and manage the site including membership sales and support. We do not promote or manage the models for other type of modeling work. We pay you to model on one of our sites. What a model makes depends on the site's income. We do not ever charge you a cent for our services. We do hope to make money for you and us. We do not guarantee that a site will generate income. We try to pick models we feel will generate interest. We do not accept all submissions. We keep our sites clean. We do not do nude or sexual sites. If nudity or sexual content is where your interests lie then you are on the wrong site. We do Digital Video editing, sales and distribution. We follow the laws of the United States. We do not break these laws. Apr 24 06 01:57 pm Link Note and just an observation Notice that these preteen and parents have had decent professional taken images,an actual web site and Make up and hair artist. Most likley neither so called model or photographer works under TFP Terms They hide there domain register ownership. They require a telephone call for there services being sold. Now compare this to many models and photographers on this web site. Many dont have .com web site Many new models wont call or have a BF call. Many have self taken or amateur taken semi pro photos. Maybe it is me but who seems more organized and making Money? and they work in team work were many models and photographers cant Apr 24 06 02:03 pm Link Ack... Apr 24 06 02:06 pm Link thats just wrong i have no idea how a mom could be ok with putting there daughter out there like that i have a 9 year old daughter and theres no way in hell i dress her up like that its absoultly sickk!!!! and did any one notic how it say to promote them and there photographers who in the hell would wan tto promote a photographer that would take ppics of youbg girls like that!!!! some times i dont understand this world!!!!! Apr 24 06 02:07 pm Link eva luv wrote: I agree that its wrong and dont support or approve it Apr 24 06 02:11 pm Link I will say that at a quick look, I can tell you where to find a live show just like this -- just go to any beach. There will be a ton of 12 to 14 yr olds dressed like this. (Not saying it's good, just that it's there!) Apr 24 06 02:23 pm Link OMFG!!!!! First I just want to say: You people surprise me!!!! âEww, this makes me sick!â? âWhaaa I just feel so sadâ? âboo f***ing woo, the poor kids.â? Letâs report this site! (maybe you will be the first to do so! But I donât think so!!) Get a LIFE! How many times have you, the photographer been called perverts for shooting nudes!!! Or how about you the, model who have kids that their friendâs mommy see your MM site and call you a Slut, Dog, and Bitch!! Who are you people to say what is exceptable and what is not. We all push the limits to satisfy our artwork. We all know the laws because we donât want to break them. Now I am not saying I agree with this site, But I have now just looked at it, (thanks to the first poster, this site may never have many hits in one day!) and I would have to say I saw nothing illegal on this site. (All within the US laws.) I personally would not shoot any one under the age of 16 in a swim suit. In fact just yesterday I was asked by a mother, âYou wouldnât shoot anything risky of my kid would you?â? My response was to her, âAt the age of 15, I wouldnât even shoot her in a swim suit.â? On the outer hand I shot this 9 year old (fully clothed) and her mother started talking about swim suits and how I felt about it. I told her I would not do this and that at the age of 9 I donât see any reason to do this. She agreed with me and said her kid was too young. A week later she had a web site put up of the girl, and I looked at it. To my surprise what I had seen was the 9 year old girl was in a two piece. Parents arenât all that smart. They feel that any exposure they can get from their kid is good, and it will help them get into modeling as the kid and parent would like to do. Just on a side note I read that Brooke Shields was being shot nude at the age of â10â? Apr 24 06 03:12 pm Link Wretched Beauty wrote: Gregory Garecki wrote: May as well save your breath. This has been discussed here, and elsewhere, before and no matter how much YOU, personally, or I, or anyone else, may not like it the images are legal and the websites are legal. If they weren't they would have been shut down a long time ago. Apr 24 06 04:34 pm Link double post Apr 24 06 04:37 pm Link Isn't that illegal!!!!!! I swear that is sooo horrible and gross. And you know that creepy old guys are looking at that. They are wearing thongs and stuff like that and they have a better sexy look on their face then some of the professional models. YUCK! Apr 24 06 04:43 pm Link V Powell wrote: It loaded like 6 of the top images and I immediately alt-f4'd. 8| Apr 24 06 04:46 pm Link Ohh My God! This is sick, they are like 10 years old and absolutely all the pics are either in swimsuit, lingerine, and with these looks and expressions, man, wonder what they're gonna grow up to..This site doesn't have to do with real modeling even one bit! Apr 24 06 04:59 pm Link rp_photo wrote: I saw some black kids on thier too...so just can't blame it on the white folks this time Apr 24 06 05:03 pm Link I am just reporting it to Google in an effort to have google take it out of their search engine, Star also report webeweb.net, it is the shell company that hosts the site Apr 24 06 05:16 pm Link Apr 24 06 05:21 pm Link This is totally gross. It's like 14 year old lingerie. Who doesn't feel like they're doing something wrong when they look at that? I hope these kids aren't serious. Apr 24 06 05:22 pm Link And the site says they don't do sexual or nude images. They may not do nudes but those images ARE sexually suggestive. Blech. I'm adding my report to the others. Apr 24 06 05:28 pm Link There have been a few programs on the news about these sites. They have been around for awhile and heavily investigated. There is a reason they are still up though....they are legal and they are HUGELY popular. An investigation found the true owners of the sites are often registered off shore companies. Also, these sites are making literally millions of dollars every year. They have been taken to court numerous times and won every case. Apr 24 06 05:28 pm Link judging from the young girls on the site - they look like they are all from Eastern Europe. The photos may be hosted off-site outside the US. Well the fashion wants them younger and younger! But guess where the paying customers are located. most likely your republican neighbor c/o CHILDSUPERMODELS.COM P.O. Box 821650 Vancouver, WA 98682 US, Registrant: webe web corp Registered through: GoDaddy.com Domain Name: DANIKA-MODEL.COM Domain servers in listed order: NS1.WEBEWEB.NET NS2.WEBEWEB.NET For complete domain details go to: Current Registrar: GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC. IP Address: 64.135.117.2 (ARIN & RIPE IP search) IP Location: US(UNITED STATES)-FLORIDA-BOCA RATON Record Type: Domain Name Server Type: Apache 1 Lock Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK Web Site Status: Active DMOZ no listings Y! Directory: see listings Secure: No E-commerce: No Traffic Ranking: 3 Data as of: 29-Nov-2005 Apr 24 06 05:37 pm Link UnoMundo Photography wrote: Heh, I was just going to post the whois I found. Apr 24 06 05:38 pm Link very sad. i cant believe someone would tell a child to pose that way, they obviously arent getting those pose ideas on their own  Apr 24 06 05:39 pm Link OMG I can't believe this thread still has life. Apr 24 06 05:44 pm Link "most likely your republican neighboor" ?? Hmmm, care to explain that ? Apr 24 06 05:47 pm Link I once ran an "adult telephone consulting service" and had uncles and parents of 13 yr olds and younger ask to hire their kids/neices/etc. I literally had an FBI agent's number on speed dial! It's sick and I'd suggest we email this website to FBI or whatever organization monitors such things Apr 24 06 05:52 pm Link OK that is some really sick shit! I am not the most conservative person around and I may have some, hmmm liberated ideas about sex and yes I am male and no I do not have any children. But that is really sick shit...a playground for pedophiles. What the F... are they thinking. Most of those kids are babies! What twisted MF thought that this was ok? Who...who would let there child do this? Man...I have lost the last ounce of hope for this country. If those parents can't understand why that is so twisted and sick...that's it my blood pressure just spiked and I can't feel my hand. I gotta go calm down. Think I'll go look at Scientific American. Wow...I just don't believe that shit!! Apr 24 06 06:09 pm Link Terry Breedlove wrote: LOL! Yeah, that would certainly improve the kids' prospects for mental stability and a loving environment. Apr 24 06 06:32 pm Link Stephen Dawson wrote: Yes, I saw a similar post in a thread a while back about a mom (described as a very likely heroin user) contacting a photographer about getting her young teen daughter into lingerie modeling!! Apr 24 06 06:39 pm Link The FBI is already quite aware of this banner page with all the Webe sites linked to it. They have been keeping an eagle eye out on it and have done what they can to try to shut them down. But as the website stated, it is not illegal. Before we drive ourselves crazy with anger and do something we may regret later in terms of passing new legislature to curtail this sort of website ... let's look at the facts! This is an example of "Exploitation" of children, and it is not technically or completely illegal. Adults in the entertainment industry, along with parents, have been doing it for a very long time. For example, in the movie industry ... Judy Garland, Natalie Woods, and Drew Barrymore, then in the music industry ... Frank Sinatra, Michael Jackson, Leann Rimes, just to name a few ... but there are hundreds, if not thousands of children exploited for the sake of entertainment every year. Many of the things that were done to children by the entertainment industry many years ago are illegal today. But there are clearly ways around it when large sums of money are involved. So DO keep in mind that children are ON the sets of television shows, movies, and they are also in recording studios making records. Although you may think that passing laws will put an end to a "Webe website" ... IT WONT! The Internet is now being used as a tool for entertainment, and this Webe website is a result of that. While it is not technically illegal when these websites don't cross the line of nudity ... it's too dang close for most of us to be comfortable with. The "Pandora's Box" has been opened a long time ago. Responsible Parenting is the KEY to changing the World Wide Web. As an entertainer and parent, Bill Cosby "gets it!" I have an understanding of it too, having been young and wanting to be a rock star, actor or famous before I was 18 ... how many of us remember those days? Is passing an age limit for pictures of people on the Internet going to do it? No, not a snowballs chance in hell! Do you want your pictures to be judged as to if the content is "adult" or not? Can we shut out the rest of the World? No and No! In nearly all countries of Europe and Asia ... you see full nudity constantly. I have friends from Russia who travel the World and they tell me that "Americans may give the impression that they are liberal minded, and freedom oriented ... but are very different that the rest of the World!" A breast slipping out during Janet Jacksons performance at the Superbowl barely causes a raised eyebrow in the rest of the World. Seriously, do you think this Webe Web stuff would have a market outside of the United States? It doesn't! Child pornography MUST be kept illegal because it is the worst of exploitation of children. As far as I know, child porn IS illegal through out the World, but the solution to slowing down or preventing websites like those produced by Webe Web starts with the PARENTS! Apr 24 06 06:44 pm Link That just makes me really sad and sick to my stomach. Those poor little kids are being exposed in bikini's all over the internet (well whoever clicks that site). They are not kid supermodels, sheesh, they are little girls. Uhuhuh... Apr 24 06 06:51 pm Link |
