William Coleman wrote:

And there are pathetic people who don't wank.  (just wanted to throw that in)

There are people who don't wank?

DrakenARTZ wrote:
Alright I have noticed that the contents of this photography/modeling web site has becoming more pornographic each month, nothing personal but when I first joined there was hardly any pornographic photography on the site.

Do you have anything more than a general feeling to support this? I haven't seen anything to indicate that "the contents of this photography/modeling web site has becoming more pornographic each month".

DrakenARTZ wrote:
Now of course I didnt just make this topic up souly for that but because of the large amount of images like that it has attracted a lot of guys who have no interest in photography (Accept to wank off to it). They have been randomly adding my girlfriend and a few other friends I know on this site to MSN or just emailing them for some 'live cyber sex shit'...
Im sure it has happen to a lot of female models and mostly its guys from the middle-east adding them. I mean they seem to be on Every site that involves profiles of some type and they just go around to 'find-add-wank'.

Model Mayhem needs to put something in place to protect their models from Pathetic Wankers like me. My girlfriend has gotten at least 4 of them adding her and she has had to take down her contact details off her page because they would just add her off there, only interested in a wank. The only reason she put them up was to get modeling work but at the rate its going she is just getting sick of the site because of the people it attracts and Im with her on that one too...

Not being a female model, I haven't had the personal emails. If it's happening, not posting "private" information on a publicly accessible page might be a good idea. (That topic has been brought up in threads over the last 6 months.)

DrakenARTZ wrote:
I dont think it will done and most of you will tell me to get fucked because you dont give a damn about anyone with an opinion on something but...

I care about opinions. I give a lot more credence to opinions that can be substantiated, though.

DrakenARTZ wrote:
As much as some of the people on this site try to defend these people by saying they are not sending messages and such.

Are we reading the same thread? I didn't see that comment once, much less from more than one person.

As has been mentioned multiple times, if you put information on a page which is known to be visible to the public, expecting the public to not see it is somewhat foolish.

Angel Tara wrote:
I'm kinda hungry...

can I have a cookie?

theda wrote:
I don't know... do you have a life?

You know, I was tempted to make a comment about how having your cookie would be the life, but it occured to me that might get me in trouble