Forums > General Industry > what is Art?

Photographer

Click Hamilton

Posts: 36555

San Diego, California, US

https://i.pbase.com/o4/58/623858/1/55337913.200601242144w.jpg

Jan 26 06 06:07 pm Link

Model

~*Isabel Aurora*~

Posts: 5778

Boca del Mar, Florida, US

wow what in interesting picture!

Kudos smile

Jan 26 06 06:08 pm Link

Photographer

Click Hamilton

Posts: 36555

San Diego, California, US

IsabelAurora wrote:
wow what in interesting picture!

Kudos smile

Thanks Isabel. It's nice to get my first response from a beautiful model. I like your photos too!

Jan 26 06 06:09 pm Link

Photographer

Click Hamilton

Posts: 36555

San Diego, California, US

https://i.pbase.com/o4/58/623858/1/55337934.200601242188w.jpg

Jan 26 06 06:11 pm Link

Photographer

D. Brian Nelson

Posts: 5477

Rapid City, South Dakota, US

You told me once when we shared that Mad Dog, but I forgot.

-Don (you called me "Dan")

Jan 26 06 06:13 pm Link

Photographer

Gary Davis

Posts: 1829

San Diego, California, US

Didn't that guy play one of the DJ characters on WKRP in Cincinnati?

Jan 26 06 06:16 pm Link

Photographer

Click Hamilton

Posts: 36555

San Diego, California, US

D. Brian Nelson wrote:
You told me once when we shared that Mad Dog, but I forgot.

-Don (you called me "Dan")

Hahaha ... I remember!
.... I think


...... Dan who?

Dan Helmut?

Jan 26 06 06:18 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Gary Davis wrote:
Didn't that guy play one of the DJ characters on WKRP in Cincinnati?

I was thinking the guy who found Laura Palmer's body in Twin Peaks.

Jan 26 06 06:42 pm Link

Photographer

Gary Davis

Posts: 1829

San Diego, California, US

Oh look, he is in San Diego.  I thought that trolley looked familiar tongue

Jan 26 06 06:46 pm Link

Photographer

Click Hamilton

Posts: 36555

San Diego, California, US

OK, I'm serious.
What is ART?

When I try to think about it my brain expands faster than my ability to comprehend then I get lost in the abyss

Please help me narrow this down

Jan 26 06 06:47 pm Link

Photographer

Click Hamilton

Posts: 36555

San Diego, California, US

https://i.pbase.com/o4/58/623858/1/54768885.2006010918173w.jpg

Sorry, but I swapped out a beautiful nude photo with this car seat because I think I'm not allowed to show pubic hair in forum posts. You can see the photo that was supposed to be in this slot by going here: http://www.pbase.com/click_hamilton/image/55007474

Jan 26 06 06:47 pm Link

Photographer

Nihilus

Posts: 10888

Nashville, Tennessee, US

Art is:

That which moves, embodied/contained/captured within a sensory medium.

...what moves you?

Jan 26 06 06:53 pm Link

Photographer

James Jackson Fashion

Posts: 11132

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

Click Hamilton wrote:
OK, I'm serious.
What is ART?

Art is something worthy of critique.  If you can look at it and, being honest with yourself (very big key), not turn away from it without making a judgment of it...it is art.

If you can just pass it over, it's not art.

Jan 26 06 06:56 pm Link

Photographer

AllenA

Posts: 591

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

ahh... I can't describe it, but I know it when I see it?

Art:
http://www.dievee.be/
http://www.pbase.com/maryduprie/root

NOT Art:
http://home.att.net/~gregstones/axhum.htm
http://www.imarc.net/blog/42/freakish_z … _11_steps/

But, you know.. this comes with that standard internet disclaimer:  IMHO.

Cheers,

Allen

Jan 26 06 07:18 pm Link

Photographer

James Jackson Fashion

Posts: 11132

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

AllenA wrote:
ahh... I can't describe it, but I know it when I see it?

You're letting yourself, and artists, off way to easy Allen.

Jan 26 06 07:21 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Art is saying, as Marley said in A Christmas Carol, "Humanity is my business!"

Jan 26 06 07:56 pm Link

Photographer

Lo Fi Art

Posts: 1311

Alice Town, Biminis, Bahamas

Art is shooting what you want and F*ck everyone's opinion!
As long as your having fun.

Jan 26 06 07:57 pm Link

Photographer

James Jackson Fashion

Posts: 11132

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

Captured Live wrote:
Art is shooting what you want and F*ck everyone's opinion!
As long as your having fun.

No...that's fun...not art...

Jan 26 06 08:09 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

raveneyes wrote:
No...that's fun...not art...

It could be both.

Jan 26 06 08:10 pm Link

Photographer

James Jackson Fashion

Posts: 11132

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

Ched wrote:

It could be both.

*could* be...but saying to yourself "Fuck everyone else's opinion" takes the person saying it out of the realm of artist.  An artist's goal is to make people notice their work...make something worth critiquing...if you're not doing that then why would you be considered an artist?

Of course there are accidental artists...people who by chance happen to capture something that is artistic...but hey, I've sunk a 50' putt...I wouldn't call myself a golfer.

Jan 26 06 08:13 pm Link

Model

Jay Dezelic

Posts: 5029

Seattle, Washington, US

ART - It's an acronym for "Arbitrary Reality Transformation"

Jan 26 06 08:14 pm Link

Photographer

Digiography

Posts: 3367

Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada

A sculptor once explained to me the difference between art and craft.  Craft is something you can pee in, Art is something you can pee on.  Hope this help, every time I think I've created art, I remember this and chuckle.

Jan 26 06 08:15 pm Link

Photographer

James Jackson Fashion

Posts: 11132

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

Digiography wrote:
A sculptor once explained to me the difference between art and craft.  Craft is something you can pee in, Art is something you can pee on.  Hope this help, every time I think I've created art, I remember this and chuckle.

Lol...that's a good one.

Jan 26 06 08:19 pm Link

Photographer

Glamour Boulevard

Posts: 8628

Sacramento, California, US

I think it is interesting. But I have to bring in a bit of sillyness smile
Might this thread also qualify as a non bondage "photographer in distress shot" since you are on tracks and a train is coming? smile

Jan 26 06 08:23 pm Link

Photographer

former_mm_user

Posts: 5521

New York, New York, US

Ched wrote:

I was thinking the guy who found Laura Palmer's body in Twin Peaks.

ha!  jack nance was great - 'there's a FISH....in the PERCOLATOR!"

Jan 26 06 08:26 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Ched wrote:
I was thinking the guy who found Laura Palmer's body in Twin Peaks.

Christopher Bush wrote:
ha!  jack nance was great - 'there's a FISH....in the PERCOLATOR!"

rofl

Jan 26 06 08:49 pm Link

Photographer

GregBrown

Posts: 784

Atlanta, Georgia, US

SO many answers to the question what is art....
ESPECIALLY in response to Raveneyes assertion about the NEED to critique....
Mel Brooks....History of the World (Part I)  Sorry I'm having to paraphrase here...BUT...."Not long after man walked upright, there was the birth of art.  Followed, logically by the AFTERBIRTH of art-the art critic."

"No artist needs criticism, just appreciation."   Gertrude Stein

And just for your edification...I was declared Artmaster General in college....Of course, I created not only the office, but also named myself to the post...NEVERTHELESS...The qualifications for art:   1. Art MUST be red.
        2. Art CANNOT be eaten.
        3. Art takes AT LEAST 15 minutes to create.
        4. Art CANNOT be plaid  (see costume exception below)  [This was a theatre design school, so costuming was of concern]

    In case of confusion--check for breast exposure.  If one breast is exposed, the object is PROBABLY art.  If two or more breasts are in full view, the object in question is MOST DEFINITELY art.

   Plaid may be used in costuming art, but ONLY if it is VERY carefully matched.  Tassels also contribute greatly to "art factor" in costume pieces.

I hope this was some help.  The original photo was DEFINITELY art...I was liking it a lot.

Jan 26 06 09:09 pm Link

Photographer

AllenA

Posts: 591

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

raveneyes wrote:
You're letting yourself, and artists, off way to easy Allen.

Well.. I'm definitely quoting a simplified answer to this ancient question.

Plato, Locke, Descartes,and Hume couldn't get a straight answer on what Knowledge was, so trying to get a concensus here on what art is may be in vain.

Listing a couple of (quickly selected) web pages with my art/not opinion WAS an easy way out though.... and you're right to call me on that...

I know that the first two are definitely ART... but the second two?  I'm willing to negotiate depending on your argument...

There are problems with any opinion I state though:

Art evokes feeling, but not all items that evoke feeling are art....
:: a litter of puppies getting tangled in my hair evokes feeling, but puppies are not art::

Art can be immediately beautiful  OR it can be personally challenging to experience...
:: I have always gasped in awe at the paintings of Monet, but I used to find the sculpture of Rodin ugly (they grew on me though... like that last Radiohead album...)::

Art should stay in your mind and draw you back... but certain old shoots in various Penthouse Mags stick in my mind & draw me back, and it ain't for the art...

Perhaps if I don't understand it, then it is art... but I don't FEEL that's the truth.

'Feeling' is what it comes down to.  The concept of 'Beauty is in the eye of the beholder' is an old one, but not all art is beautiful now, is it?

The book 'Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintanence' covered the elusive description of 'Quality' quite nicely... but does art have to contain quality?  I believe so.  But just because a photographer has posted a quality image, I can't say that means it is also art.

I feel that the description 'Pop Art' is best described as 'Currently popular'

BUT... just because something is popular doesn't mean it isn't artistic.... and the reverse is true: just because something is artistic, doesn't mean it is popular.

I think that you and I may walk through an amature 'art' gallery & have a fine discorse & general agreement on what the art is, but here?  I feel that on an internet forum I can only show you what I believe is artistic, and what I belive is not.

I'd also like to state that just because an image is not artistic, doesn't mean I don't LIKE it.

Why is that?

The images that the OP originally posted were kinda cool to me.  I wouldn't call 'em 'art' though.

So.. the question remains:  What Is Art?

I will reply with the only answer I can give in a forum post:

I couldn't describe it too you logically, but I know it when I see it....

Cheers,

Allen

Jan 26 06 09:10 pm Link

Photographer

GregBrown

Posts: 784

Atlanta, Georgia, US

I couldn't describe it too you logically, but I know it when I see it....


  There's a great James Thurber cartoon of a guy peering at the Mona Lisa.  A woman off ot the side is saying to another one, "He knows ALL ABOUT art, he just doesn't know what he likes."

Absolutely one of my favorites.

Jan 26 06 09:12 pm Link

Model

Daria S

Posts: 31

New York, New York, US

here is a cliché

art is a state of mind

Jan 26 06 09:16 pm Link

Photographer

Friday Art Photography

Posts: 422

Atlantic, Iowa, US

If you are really interested in a discussion of the definiton of Art--how it has been defined historically and in contemporary society, and whether a definiton is even possible, read "The Art Question".  Most good bookstores have it. .

Jan 26 06 09:32 pm Link

Photographer

KEKnight

Posts: 1876

Cumming, Georgia, US

I think it's in the eye of the beholder.

Jan 26 06 09:34 pm Link

Photographer

KEKnight

Posts: 1876

Cumming, Georgia, US

Double post.

Jan 26 06 09:35 pm Link

Photographer

Nihilus

Posts: 10888

Nashville, Tennessee, US

Something about the "i know it when I see it" answers don't sit well with me. Perhaps because it is the same mentality that draws the imaginary line between what is porn and what is art...what is evil and what is good...what is right and what is wrong...

I understand that the nucleus of art resides in its ability to engorge the emotions, but that's no excuse for not more aptly defining it, at least to one's self.

Jan 26 06 10:46 pm Link

Photographer

The Art of CIP

Posts: 1074

Long Beach, California, US

I remember when I was at my first art school over a decade ago - one of my professors ask the question to the class "What is art"  my friend responded  "what is shit?"  Everytime I hear that question that moment pops into my head..

Jan 26 06 10:48 pm Link

Photographer

Les Sterling

Posts: 439

Kansas City, Missouri, US

I love this topic. At once it seems like a purely academic discussion, but in reality it's the very heart of the existence of so many photographers.

The definition that has come closest (but not exactly, perhaps) to my own concept of "art" is thus:

"The existence of art is predicated on one principle, that it is created exclusively for the edification and appreciation of the senses - be it sight, sound, taste, touch or smell."

By this definition, art cannot be functional.
For instance, food might be visually magnificent and cause you to salivate, but since it's purpose is also nutrition, it cannot be art. It can be artistic, but cannot be art.

As well, an exceptional piece of architecture might be a sight to behold, and take your breath away and play sweet music as the wind blows through the cornices. But it is also designed for people to live or work in - It can be artistic, but cannot be art.

A photograph can be created with such staggering expertise, and is so disturbing as to elicit tears, but if it's created to illustrate a news article about war, it can be artistic, but cannot be art.

Now, before I catch flak from all sides, I also believe in the fluidity of art. Something that was created, originally, with a practical purpose in mind might later be considered art because of it's inspired design, and be appreciated purely for its creativity since it is no longer of practical use. Perhaps the key is to remove the functional element, and it can be art.

I'm not yet sure what I think of "decorative art" - those paintings and framed posters that you buy purely to decorate your house. I'm still mulling that one over.
But a friend of mine contends that if you buy it in the parking lot of a gas station, it cannot be art.

I'm not too sure if I agree, though. smile

Jan 26 06 11:04 pm Link

Photographer

Click Hamilton

Posts: 36555

San Diego, California, US

raveneyes wrote:
An artist's goal is to make people notice their work...make something worth critiquing...if you're not doing that then why would you be considered an artist?

The idea that Art might be the self expression of an Artist might enter into this discussion

sounds like ... another conundrum.

Jan 26 06 11:20 pm Link

Photographer

The Art of CIP

Posts: 1074

Long Beach, California, US

art is easily defined as everyone here already has there own definition of it...  We seem to have all of the usual suspects in here (and a few new ones) - so does anyone wanna answer the question - "What is good and art & what is bad art?" 
*goes to grab beer and waits for the fireworks..* wink~

Jan 26 06 11:23 pm Link

Photographer

Voice of Reason

Posts: 8741

Anaheim, California, US

The Art of CIP wrote:
art is easily defined as everyone here already has there own definition of it...  We seem to have all of the usual suspects in here (and a few new ones) - so does anyone wanna answer the question - "What is good and art & what is bad art?" 
*goes to grab beer and waits for the fireworks..* wink~

Good art makes you feel good, and bad art makes you feel bad.

Jan 26 06 11:25 pm Link

Photographer

MarkMarek

Posts: 2211

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

If you need a MUA to make a photograph, it's not art.

Jan 26 06 11:32 pm Link