Craig Thomson wrote:
I don't, so I guess you're alone

You say that as though you and I are the only two people who post in the forums

Glamour Boulevard wrote:
Am I the only one who sometimes uses the replies given or the way they are given as some sort of a test to see if you want to work with that person or not?

I d... don't ... un... understand the kwestion!

Kann you pleaz type it slowlyer, 'cauz I kannit reed that fazt...

UdoR wrote:

I d... don't ... un... understand the kwestion!

Kann you pleaz type it slowlyer, 'cauz I kannit reed that fazt...

huuked awn funeex dydint wurk fur yew

Glamour Boulevard wrote:
Am I the only one who sometimes uses the replies given or the way they are given as some sort of a test to see if you want to work with that person or not?
I often give very good details in my posts, especially my casting call posts. I even give specific information on the best way to contact me. Such simple details that if they can not follow them , or if they ask questions already answered in the post,I am not sure if I want to use my time and effort to work with them.

I don't get it.  What do you mean?

Glamour Boulevard wrote:
Am I the only one who sometimes uses the replies given or the way they are given as some sort of a test to see if you want to work with that person or not?
I often give very good details in my posts, especially my casting call posts. I even give specific information on the best way to contact me. Such simple details that if they can not follow them , or if they ask questions already answered in the post,I am not sure if I want to use my time and effort to work with them.

Maybe try putting a specific request in your casting call posts...like contacting you via email or your web site...that would probably weed out the attentive people!



*giggle* I'm interested.....

Mandie wrote:
For example, if someone is writing things like "l8 4 shoots,"

Thank You.

Leave the convoluted vanity plate acronyms to the losers

Glamour Boulevard wrote:
huuked awn funeex dydint wurk fur yew

nop' Me wunna reefondle

swhnyc wrote:
The way people express themselves online and the way they express themselves elsewhere differs a great deal, though.  I think the synapses controlling grammar, punctuation and spelling shut off once the monitor clicks on, even amongst otherwise educated and sensible sorts. 

I WILL say that whoever decided it was acceptable to do away with to, two, and too and replace them with the numerical 2 ("that's 2 funny!," "2 sexy 4 u," etc.) needs to be dragged out into the street and shot.

But I agree that in general, if people don't pay attention to what you've written and it causes them to act and/or sound like retarded Junebugs, they deserve [b]a little[b] mirthful ire aimed in their direction.

Define a little...

Jack North wrote:
oR HoW bOuT wHeN ThEy tYpE lIkE tHiS?

::spins in an elliptical pattern then falls apart::

Jack North wrote:
oR HoW bOuT wHeN ThEy tYpE lIkE tHiS?

When I begin my New World Order and put "Stupid-People Genocide" into full-swing, those folks will be the first to go........

Eric Muss-Barnes wrote:

When I begin my New World Order and put "Stupid-People Genocide" into full-swing, those folks will be the first to go........

But, but who then will run our Country?

Eric Muss-Barnes wrote:
When I begin my New World Order and put "Stupid-People Genocide" into full-swing, those folks will be the first to go........

we are going to have to come to some arrangement, cannot have two world orders with death squads on the go, yours & mine.

Doug Mackay    DMP wrote:

we are going to have to come to some arrangement, cannot have two world orders with death squads on the go, yours & mine.

Sure you can...Twice the killing...half the time

Of course if we toss my death squad in there, then we get thrice the killing in a third the time...or do you not think we can push them that hard?

raveneyes wrote:
Maybe try putting a specific request in your casting call posts...like contacting you via email or your web site...that would probably weed out the attentive people!

I DO. That is one of the things that gets me. There is no thread tracker so I say to email me if interested. Now and then I find a casting call I did months ago and forgot about and , sure enough they replied directly in the thread instead of email like I said.

Mandie wrote:
My 6th graders do better!

Why do I suddenly hear Van Halen playing?

UdoR wrote:

nop' Me wunna reefondle

en anudder powst yer sed yer reefondle awwl thi tyme doe

Ched wrote:

Why do I suddenly her Van Halen playing?

bowh chika chika wah wah

Glamour Boulevard wrote:
I DO. That is one of the things that gets me. There is no thread tracker so I say to email me if interested. Now and then I find a casting call I did months ago and forgot about and , sure enough they replied directly in the thread instead of email like I said.

How many casting calls are you listing that you forget what you've posted?  Have you tried a bulliten board or Post-Its?

Brian Diaz wrote:

How many casting calls are you listing that you forget what you've posted?  Have you tried a bulliten board or Post-Its?

I know, I should have written down the headers I used  back when we could make our own. But I did not. Basically any idea I thought of that I wanted to shoot I would post a casting call for. Now with the new format for posting casting calls, finding my posts are even harder.

But I do not have to post many to lose them. There are 80k members on here last I heard. Lot`s of people posting means your post gets lost in the stack.

raveneyes wrote:

Sure you can...Twice the killing...half the time

Of course if we toss my death squad in there, then we get thrice the killing in a third the time...or do you not think we can push them that hard?

good things always come in threes

Ched wrote:

Why do I suddenly her Van Halen playing?

Haha, thanks Ched.

Glamour Boulevard wrote:
Mandie,I just went through your profile and site. I am hurting right now. I was eating General Chicken, ya know, that hot spicy Chinese chicken dish? I swallowed one of the tiny hot peppers!

See OP's opening remark

Glamour Boulevard wrote:
Am I the only one who sometimes uses the replies given or the way they are given as some sort of a test to see if you want to work with that person or not?

No.

-D

Jack North wrote:
Another one of my favorites is

I am interested.

wow, I was just thinking the same thing.
you should go and look at the first page of the Audrey thread...

Lapis wrote:

Took you much longer to join the thread than I expected

Jack North wrote:
oR HoW bOuT wHeN ThEy tYpE lIkE tHiS?

agg!! *throws shoe in your general direction*

The Thorny Rose wrote:

agg!! *throws shoe in your general direction*

-picks shoe back up off floor- Hell with general direction. That deserves a direct hit! -beams it at Jacks head-

Elite Imaging wrote:
"NEWAYS"

First time I saw this one I though" Kneeways?"