Photographer
fbap
Posts: 11
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
Models who have nothing but point & shoot camera shots taken by the model themselves at the end of arms reach, and THEN have the audacity to say "contact me for rates"?? I understand taking a few snaps of a face in order to get a look on the site, but until a model has a few solid photo shoots under their belt, I don't think they can reasonably ask for compensation aside from test prints or a CD. Opinions?
Photographer
Voice of Reason
Posts: 8741
Anaheim, California, US
you really have time to let this stuff bug you? I call them "entertainment".
Model
Stacy
Posts: 2505
Englewood, Florida, US
Philip Forrest wrote: Models who have nothing but point & shoot camera shots taken by the model themselves at the end of arms reach, and THEN have the audacity to say "contact me for rates"?? I understand taking a few snaps of a face in order to get a look on the site, but until a model has a few solid photo shoots under their belt, I don't think they can reasonably ask for compensation aside from test prints or a CD. Opinions? I'm sure they will soon figure this out for themselves
Model
Mitsukai
Posts: 581
Walnut Creek, California, US
David Moyle wrote: you really have time to let this stuff bug you? I call them "entertainment". As in escorts, prostitutes, hoochies...
Photographer
Just Shoot Me Photograp
Posts: 976
Chattanooga, Tennessee, US
There is one i seen her rate is 1500 a day with all snap shots and webcam pictures.She is 5'6 and 141 pounds.Good luck with that one.And she does not do nudes.
Photographer
Gary Blanchette
Posts: 5137
Irvine, California, US
Philip Forrest wrote: I don't think they can reasonably ask for compensation aside from test prints or a CD. Opinions? Unless they are extraordinarily beautiful even in the snapshots.
Photographer
fbap
Posts: 11
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
"1500 a day with all snap shots and webcam pictures.She is 5'6 and 141 pounds.Good luck with that one.And she does not do nudes." OMG. hehheh heh heh heh!
Photographer
Voice of Reason
Posts: 8741
Anaheim, California, US
Mitsukai wrote:
As in escorts, prostitutes, hoochies... Well, no, I was thinking more like a skit on SNL. But, ok.
Photographer
Tonino Guzzo
Posts: 62
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
the proof is in the pudding...
Model
Mitsukai
Posts: 581
Walnut Creek, California, US
David Moyle wrote:
Well, no, I was thinking more like a skit on SNL. But, ok. I wasn't.
Photographer
Voice of Reason
Posts: 8741
Anaheim, California, US
Tonino Guzzo wrote: the proof is in the pudding... You brought pudding? I love pudding!
Photographer
Voice of Reason
Posts: 8741
Anaheim, California, US
Mitsukai wrote:
I wasn't. I caught that.
Model
Loretta Lightningbolt
Posts: 4127
DEVILS ELBOW, Missouri, US
Ugh. Don't get me started. (pudding is gross)
Photographer
Fotografia-di-Asia
Posts: 6118
Park City, Utah, US
i think you know exactly what to do with them, right? i mean your avatar pic. . .
Model
Iona Lynn
Posts: 11176
Oakland, California, US
No more than the photographers who have two maybe three shoots under their belt who try to demand payment as well... Welcome to the Internet Good morning OP You have just stepped out of your safe little world of agency modeling, and into the big bad world of internet photography. There are no rules here; a girl who is 5â 1â in 4â stiletto heals can get paid work from photographers, so can a girl who is bigger than a size 4. The typical agency rules donât apply to us anymore. Sorry about that, in just a few days your in box will be filled with silly little girls with crappy web cam photos saying they love your work, yet you need to pay 150.00 an hour to shoot them. Not to make it too complicated there are several different camps of people all colliding on this site: Agency models and photographers = work for clients and have a set of standards Artist models and photographers = work for art and the chance to be in the galleries. Amateur models and photographers = work to learn some of these guys and girls will move up and do some great work in the above categories. GWP and GWC = itâs all about the b(o)(o)bies. Welcome to our worldâ¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦..
Photographer
Max Johnson
Posts: 178
San Jose, California, US
Iona Lynn wrote: No more than the photographers who have two maybe three shoots under their belt who try to demand payment as well... Welcome to the Internet Good morning OP Seriously. I've charged for only one shoot so far and that was an engagement photo session at a severly discounted price compared to what it would cost normally. All other shoots were friends or TFP cause I don't feel that I have reached a level yet where my work is worth more than the time models will spend with me. I'm not looking for back pats here, I think I'll get there eventually, but I think more people need to be honest with themselves when it comes to money. When you've got a good portfolio that reflects a professional level of expertise, then start asking to be paid.
Photographer
fstopdreams
Posts: 4300
Chattanooga, Tennessee, US
Just Shoot Me Photograp wrote: There is one i seen her rate is 1500 a day with all snap shots and webcam pictures.She is 5'6 and 141 pounds.Good luck with that one.And she does not do nudes. Maybe she's an escort who thinks "outside the box"?
Model
Kaitlin Lara
Posts: 6467
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
If you've got tig ol' bitties it really doesn't matter what your shots look like. You're good enough for a photographer's spank bank...therefore, you will get paid.
Artist/Painter
Photosculpt
Posts: 127
Ocean City, Maryland, US
Kaitlin Lara wrote: If you've got tig ol' bitties it really doesn't matter what your shots look like. You're good enough for a photographer's spank bank...therefore, you will get paid. Spank Bank...you crack me up.
Model
little apple blossom
Posts: 7617
MCMINNVILLE, Oregon, US
Kaitlin Lara wrote: If you've got tig ol' bitties it really doesn't matter what your shots look like. You're good enough for a photographer's spank bank...therefore, you will get paid. spank bank?
Model
Kaitlin Lara
Posts: 6467
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
SculptedLife wrote:
Spank Bank...you crack me up. Well thank you
Photographer
MMPhotography
Posts: 447
Chicago, Illinois, US
David Moyle wrote: you really have time to let this stuff bug you? I call them "entertainment". Entertainment indeed.
Photographer
fstopdreams
Posts: 4300
Chattanooga, Tennessee, US
little apple blossom wrote:
spank bank? There are much cheaper ways to go about building a sizable account...
Photographer
RED Photographic
Posts: 1458
Iona Lynn wrote: No more than the photographers who have two maybe three shoots under their belt who try to demand payment as well... Welcome to the Internet Good morning OP You have just stepped out of your safe little world of agency modeling, and into the big bad world of internet photography. There are no rules here; a girl who is 5â 1â in 4â stiletto heals can get paid work from photographers, so can a girl who is bigger than a size 4. The typical agency rules donât apply to us anymore. Sorry about that, in just a few days your in box will be filled with silly little girls with crappy web cam photos saying they love your work, yet you need to pay 150.00 an hour to shoot them. Not to make it too complicated there are several different camps of people all colliding on this site: Agency models and photographers = work for clients and have a set of standards Artist models and photographers = work for art and the chance to be in the galleries. Amateur models and photographers = work to learn some of these guys and girls will move up and do some great work in the above categories. GWP and GWC = itâs all about the b(o)(o)bies. Welcome to our worldâ¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦â¦.. Wow! What she said!
Model
Kaitlin Lara
Posts: 6467
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
Trevor Snyder wrote:
There are much cheaper ways to go about building a sizable account... Yeah...but it's more fun when you've seen them in person. Why do you think so many people make their own porn as opposed to just looking online? It can't always be about vanity (although I'm sure that's part of it). Most of the time it's just about reliving a moment. And I think you underestimate how much some guys like boobies.
Model
UNDERTOW
Posts: 158
Columbus, Ohio, US
I have a lot of self taken but i do tfp so i suck , But I know what you're talking about the web cam pics are the worst then they try to charge lol
Photographer
Jay Bowman
Posts: 6511
Los Angeles, California, US
Philip Forrest wrote: Models who have nothing but point & shoot camera shots taken by the model themselves at the end of arms reach, and THEN have the audacity to say "contact me for rates"?? I understand taking a few snaps of a face in order to get a look on the site, but until a model has a few solid photo shoots under their belt, I don't think they can reasonably ask for compensation aside from test prints or a CD. Opinions? Cripes. Imagine that, a model who actually thinks her look is worth paying for. What's this world coming to. What next... agency models who get booked for work with nothing but polaroids? Wait...
Photographer
BlindMike
Posts: 9594
San Francisco, California, US
Trevor Snyder wrote: Maybe she's an escort who thinks "outside the box"? We need a bigger box.
Photographer
BlindMike
Posts: 9594
San Francisco, California, US
Philip Forrest wrote: Models who have nothing but point & shoot camera shots taken by the model themselves at the end of arms reach, and THEN have the audacity to say "contact me for rates"?? I understand taking a few snaps of a face in order to get a look on the site, but until a model has a few solid photo shoots under their belt, I don't think they can reasonably ask for compensation aside from test prints or a CD. Opinions? All kidding aside, it's her image and she can do what she wants with it. Who are we to say what will or won't sell? Let income dictate her business decisions.
Photographer
00siris
Posts: 19182
New York, New York, US
Model
if_u_only_knew
Posts: 567
Alexander, Arkansas, US
Philip Forrest wrote: Models who have nothing but point & shoot camera shots taken by the model themselves at the end of arms reach, and THEN have the audacity to say "contact me for rates"?? I understand taking a few snaps of a face in order to get a look on the site, but until a model has a few solid photo shoots under their belt, I don't think they can reasonably ask for compensation aside from test prints or a CD. Opinions? It can't hurt to ask:).Just because they ask doesn't mean YOU have to PAY. Let the "dreamers" have their dreams and just move on to the next model.
Photographer
Scott Harrill
Posts: 305
Forest City, North Carolina, US
Did she say she would like to skip high school that day? And use your paid shoot as the excuse?
Model
Josie Nutter
Posts: 5865
Seattle, Washington, US
Models who have nothing but point & shoot camera shots taken by the model themselves at the end of arms reach Please let me know what the MM #s of those profiles are I will deal with them. It's a pet peeve of mine, and in an effort to make sure that Model Mayhem stays a quality site filled with quality profiles, "portfolios" full of nothing but self-taken headshots are no longer welcome on Model Mayhem. "Models" with such will be suspended until s/he has worked with photographers (other than her/himself) and have better photos, including one full body shot.
Model
aye provide
Posts: 1330
New York, New York, US
Mitsukai wrote:
As in escorts, prostitutes, hoochies... You rang?????
Model
Renee Jensen
Posts: 44
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
David Moyle wrote:
You brought pudding? I love pudding! Haha.. mmmm... puuuddding!
Photographer
nevar
Posts: 14670
Fort Smith, Arkansas, US
a person can ask for anything they want. And if they get it, coodoes to them.
Photographer
Voice of Reason
Posts: 8741
Anaheim, California, US
Renee Jensen wrote:
Haha.. mmmm... puuuddding! Chocolate, Vanilla, Butterscotch, Bananna, Tapioca.......*shivers* Sorry, I'm good now.
Model
TIFFANY A
Posts: 225
Philip Forrest wrote: Models who have nothing but point & shoot camera shots taken by the model themselves at the end of arms reach, and THEN have the audacity to say "contact me for rates"?? I understand taking a few snaps of a face in order to get a look on the site, but until a model has a few solid photo shoots under their belt, I don't think they can reasonably ask for compensation aside from test prints or a CD. Opinions? At least it wasn't a webcam or camera phone shot, lol They should at least take standard snapshots that agencies take of models with potential (natural makeup and hair, straight on headshot not smiling, one smiling, profile, full body, etc). The images should also be taken by someone else with the model against a plain background with no distractions. I hate seeing webcam shots with ppls dirty laundry in the background! I also hate pics ppl take of themselves in the mirror.. use the self timer! LOL!!
Photographer
Mark J. Sebastian
Posts: 1530
San Jose, California, US
i never realized how much whining there was on MM until I took the day off work today! doesn't anyone have any real issues these days?
Photographer
Craig Thomson
Posts: 13462
Tacoma, Washington, US
Q: Any body else sick of... A: No, I like to shoot.
|