|
Forums >
General Industry >
transexuals modeling?
Myself and a few other girls were meeting with a magazine photographer and a transsexual walked in. At first I wasn't sure, but then it became clear to me what was going on. I'm sure the photog didn't know, but I didn't tell him either. Do you feel like I should've dropped a dime on "her"? Nov 17 06 07:51 pm Link Nope. This is a case of mind your own business, I would say. She got hired just like you did. Nov 17 06 07:54 pm Link dee740 wrote: This could be a joke ! Nov 17 06 07:55 pm Link I have to agree... does it really matter in the long run? Nov 17 06 08:03 pm Link dee740 wrote: mind your own goddamned business ! Nov 17 06 08:54 pm Link Maybe she got the job because she is who she is and there was no deception going on. Nov 17 06 09:01 pm Link UnoMundo Photography wrote: it was you wasn't it? Nov 17 06 09:02 pm Link UnoMundo Photography wrote: Agreed Nov 17 06 09:05 pm Link hired for the same reason as you. for her, his, no her, but his, her, no; it's all about the look. --face reality Nov 17 06 09:08 pm Link dee740 wrote: No! You should have dropped a few bucks on the photographer though. Nov 17 06 09:08 pm Link well i don't see the problem trannies usually take high priorities in their appearance,it's not your place to say anything nor should you judge!! Nov 17 06 09:20 pm Link Let's at least make this real. How many photogs have shot a "tranny" I have, prodommes love to shoot with them. RB Nov 17 06 09:24 pm Link RBDesign wrote: I have. Very beautiful and professional. /tim Nov 17 06 09:26 pm Link what makes you think he didn't know? And even if he didn't know it's not your place to say anything. Why do you even make an issue out of this? Nov 17 06 09:32 pm Link RBDesign wrote: i have she was awesome Nov 17 06 09:40 pm Link ... I don't get why this was a problem? Nov 17 06 09:41 pm Link dee740 wrote: NO, who cares Nov 17 06 09:43 pm Link Annique Delphine wrote: Maybe she felt thretened by a boy that was better at being a girl? Who knows? Nov 17 06 09:43 pm Link Jessalyn wrote: those silk panties chafe.... I like men's cotton underwear...so I gave up the alternative lifestyle. Nov 17 06 09:48 pm Link UnoMundo Photography wrote: these things happen. Nov 17 06 09:48 pm Link And there is a store that I pass from time to time "Coming Out of The Closet" for men. Just today the light turned red and I looked over to see a man putting the womens clothes that he had just bought into a very nice shopping bag. I have been around Gay's but not sure how I would feel with a transexual, transvestite, cross dresser. Did work with someone who got picked up and found out that the transvestite was better endowed than him. Sure glad that it was not me that it happened to. As for photography as long as he/she does not try anything.... Nov 17 06 09:57 pm Link I've shot a tranny and a cross dresser before. It was for their private portfolio. I'd do it again also. Nov 17 06 10:26 pm Link RBDesign wrote: ahhaha......... seriously Nov 17 06 10:28 pm Link Not to advance stereotypes, but those trannies can dominate a catwalk. I've photographed a bunch of all the voluntary genders at various clubs when I was working for the Union. Take them for who they say they are and relax a little. No, if you'd ratted and the photographer knew, you'd look like an idiot. And if the photographer didn't know, then you'd look like a rat. Live and let live. -Don Nov 17 06 11:15 pm Link I have photographed many pre op and post op transexuals, as well as crossdressers. They have all been a total blast. I did have one biological female get pissy at one at a shoot once for having better legs than she did,lol Nov 18 06 02:04 am Link NewBoldPhoto wrote: Agreed (maybe with out the cuss word) Nov 18 06 09:43 am Link dee740 wrote: Quite simply, WHY?? Nov 18 06 10:08 am Link dee740 wrote: Do you feel other models should drop dimes on you? Nov 18 06 10:45 am Link If she was really good enough to fool the photographer, then I'd say she was probably good enough for the photo shoot. So what's the problem? Nov 18 06 11:19 am Link dee740 wrote: No, she got hired for the same reason as you. Nov 18 06 02:24 pm Link buffalo bill anyone Nov 18 06 02:31 pm Link dee740 wrote: I don't think this even needed to be posted. Nov 19 06 04:45 am Link There are some really good tranny hookers at larkin and sutter in san francisco. Nov 19 06 04:53 am Link a person is a person maybe they wanted to portray their feminine side they don't have to show that there not who they are being diversity is always good. if a photographer can't tell. it shouldn't matter let em go and continue on with their work Nov 19 06 04:56 am Link Ok. she wasn't hired. He was just testing girls for the magazine. Nov 19 06 07:39 pm Link Click Hamilton wrote: ther's nothing to drop. I'm not really a man. Nov 19 06 07:40 pm Link RBDesign wrote: Umm, if "she" was that good at it I wouldn't know she was a boy. The point is, the slot is for females. It's like seeing a man as a woman in Maxim or playboy... strange isn't it? Nov 19 06 07:46 pm Link Who cares? Nov 19 06 07:50 pm Link Yup. Who cares? Nov 19 06 07:52 pm Link Constance Hilory wrote: no one forced you to post. Nov 19 06 07:57 pm Link |
