Forums > General Industry > About these rumors...

Photographer

ATMPhotos

Posts: 1565

Brooklyn, New York, US

Now, any experienced photographer would be expected to be able to tell if the models in the pics on anyone's profile were coerced or not.

It's recently come to my attention that some photographers here have been spreading rumors about me to some of the models, in addition to harrassing a model that I did a nude shoot with.

I'm being accused of forcing the models to pose in ways that they aren't comfortable with, in addition to attempting to trick some of them into posing nude.

The model that I shot nude did so of her own free will, so I don't appreciate people coming to her with this bullshit.

Since this has caused a number of models to flake on me at the last minute when I've contacted them about a paid shoot for one of my websites, I'm calling these photographers out.

If you have the balls to spread rumors about my treatment of the models who have posed for me, whose pics I've uploded to my profile, then be man or woman to confront me.

I want to see the quality of your pics, and talk to the models that you've shot with to determine how you've treated them.

As for the models who've heard these rumors and flaked out on me as a result: go ahead and miss out on paid work based on rumors told to you by photographers who are so insecure in the quality of their work, that they have to make shit up. Good luck with that.

Sep 18 06 12:39 am Link

Model

Christine

Posts: 1300

Los Angeles, California, US

I hate rumors, I have to deal with them in school since I quit my sorority.

Sep 18 06 12:54 am Link

Photographer

Arizona Shoots

Posts: 28824

Phoenix, Arizona, US

I've dealt with this too. Check out this shot in a model's portfolio:

Nudity Warning:
https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=28442

There was a photographer going around telling other models that I "sneak labia shots", based on that photo. Now, I ask you.. If I had snuck that, why the hell would SHE have it in her portfolio?

Sep 18 06 01:03 am Link

Photographer

ATMPhotos

Posts: 1565

Brooklyn, New York, US

John Jebbia wrote:
I've dealt with this too. Check out this shot in a model's portfolio:

Nudity Warning:
https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=28442

There was a photographer going around telling other models that I "sneak labia shots", based on that photo. Now, I ask you.. If I had snuck that, why the hell would SHE have it in her portfolio?

John,

Truly amazing. Did you ever find out who this photographer was? Did the models who heard this rumor believe what they were being told, or did they think for themselves?

Jelani

Sep 18 06 01:18 am Link

Photographer

Arizona Shoots

Posts: 28824

Phoenix, Arizona, US

A Twisted Mind wrote:
John,

Truly amazing. Did you ever find out who this photographer was? Did the models who heard this rumor believe what they were being told, or did they think for themselves?

Jelani

Yes. I found out who it was. One of the models he told this too happened to be one of my regulars. He didn't know. And she promptly forwarded the e-mails to me.

I used to get really pissed off when something like this happened. Sometimes making an ass out of myself, even though I was the one in the right.

I find that it's better to just not say anything and let the models make their own decisions based on my actual references and people who actually know me.

Sep 18 06 01:25 am Link

Photographer

ATMPhotos

Posts: 1565

Brooklyn, New York, US

John,

Did you have a chance to confront the photographer?

Much as I'd like to simply leave the situation alone, the photographers slandering me have made things a little difficult for the model that I shot nude with by asking her some very personal questions that aren't any of their business.

I have reason to believe that they get models to shoot with them by slandering other people's work.

Also, other models have really been asking her about these rumors constantly, so I decided to address the issue once I found out about it.

I posted about my situation at MP, since a number of the models that have shot with me have profiles here as well as there.

Jelani

Sep 18 06 01:39 am Link

Model

Muse Anya

Posts: 344

Sunnyvale, California, US

Speaking subjectively, it's easy to believe in those rumors, since your portfolio looks like it was done by a GWC (look up definition).

Sep 18 06 03:55 am Link

Photographer

Image K

Posts: 23400

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

A Twisted Mind wrote:
John,

Did you have a chance to confront the photographer?

Much as I'd like to simply leave the situation alone, the photographers slandering me have made things a little difficult for the model that I shot nude with by asking her some very personal questions that aren't any of their business.

I have reason to believe that they get models to shoot with them by slandering other people's work.

Also, other models have really been asking her about these rumors constantly, so I decided to address the issue once I found out about it.

I posted about my situation at MP, since a number of the models that have shot with me have profiles here as well as there.

Jelani

If it's not true, then it's not true. Why lose sleep over it?

What are you going to do, kick his ass?

If a model would shoot with someone, or not shoot with someone, based on these rumors, are they really worth shooting?

Let it go. It's drama that you don't need.

Unless you like drama.

Sep 18 06 04:08 am Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

A Twisted Mind wrote:
Now, any experienced photographer would be expected to be able to tell if the models in the pics on anyone's profile were coerced or not.

In my opinion, none of the models in this port look "coerced" it looks like some even had fun.

I tried to see your portfolio on your website, but none of the links are working.

Not giving you any portfolio critique, but you write in your MM profile that you refined your technical skills for 10 years. I am curious what those skills are and where you posted the images (again, I checked your website but your portfolio is down). I am  just asking.

Also, don't you think that asking for the SS# and drivers license # and proof of residence for 7 years of someone who escorts the model is a little bit overboard, or do you do this to discourage escorts even to show up? That would be an efficient strategy I'd say.

Sep 18 06 07:11 am Link

Photographer

none of the above

Posts: 3528

Marina del Rey, California, US

i heard a rumor that some people thinking if they pick up both a camera and someone willing to stand on a toilet each can consider themselves fully qualified to be considered a modeling photographer and a model.  the rumour went on to say each work under what is considered "american standard."  i'll verify and get back with you.

--face reality

Sep 18 06 09:04 am Link

Photographer

Doug Lester

Posts: 10591

Atlanta, Georgia, US

I don't know beans about the rumours you mentioned but I'm very curious about one thing. How the hell do you "trick" a woman into posing nude????? Wouldn't most women sort of catch on when you ask them to take off their clothes and stand in front of these lights? Or "coerce" a model? Use a gun, strip and stand in front of these lights or I'll shoot you?  I strongly suspect her unhappiness would show in the photos.

It sounds like you have someone pretty jealous of you out there. Ex girlfriend? Photographer who is jealous of what you do? If you can find out who is doing it, paying  a lawyer a few bucks to send a cease and desist letter would probably end it.

Sep 18 06 09:27 am Link

Photographer

Emeritus

Posts: 22000

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

A Twisted Mind wrote:
based on rumors told to you by photographers who are so insecure in the quality of their work, that they have to make shit up.

So let me see if I have this straight:

You are asserting that there are photographers out there somewhere who are so intimidated by the quality of your work that they have to "make shit up" about you to keep models from flocking to your door?

Did I get that right?

I took a look at your portfolio, so I'll ask again:  did I get that right?

Sep 18 06 10:01 am Link

Model

Cristina Ashley

Posts: 1294

Buffalo, Illinois, US

Ha.

Sep 18 06 10:10 am Link

Photographer

JM Giordano

Posts: 102

Baltimore, Maryland, US

Cristina Ashley wrote:
Ha.

I agree. This is some funny Sh!t! people. grow up. this is like reading a thread on Facebook!

Sep 18 06 10:16 am Link

Photographer

C R Photography

Posts: 3594

Pleasanton, California, US

I don’t think it’s other photographers scaring off models , I think it’s this phrase from your port:

A Twisted Mind wrote:
Models:
If, after meeting me in person, reviewing my work, and contacting some of the models that I've already shot, before a proposed photoshoot, you feel that we aren't suitable to work together, I'll have no hard feelings, and hope that you'll find a photographer more towards your liking.

Just about anybody with a negative/off the cuff attitude will be shunned.

Maybe rephrasing is in order big_smile

Sep 18 06 10:16 am Link

Model

Cristina Ashley

Posts: 1294

Buffalo, Illinois, US

"Driver's license or Passport photo ID.
Social Security #
Phone #
Physical Address (for last 7 years)

These measures are required for security purposes, and I reserve the right to determine whether you are allowed to sit in on a case by case basis."


So I take it this scares away all the escorts.

Sep 18 06 10:23 am Link

Photographer

ATMPhotos

Posts: 1565

Brooklyn, New York, US

Ok...I'll just respond to everyone in one post:

Miss Anya,

When you experience the harrassment of people asking you if you'd had sex with a particular photographer as a result of "easily believable rumors", just because you voluntarily posed nude, please feel free to get back to me. Your insight would be greatly appreciated.

ImageK,

I find that the best way to address slanderous remarks made behind my back is public exposure. While I don't expect the individuals who've spread these rumors to post here, they will read the thread, and know that I'd like to have a little chat with them.

Who knows, they might become motivated to improve the quality of their own work as opposed to slandering other people.

I'm not losing sleep, but failing to challenge the lies allows for people to assume that the rumors are true.

This might be an extreme example, but along the same lines: You wouldn't remain silent in the face of a false rape accusation, now would you?

UdoR,

Thank you very much. I'm in the process of finishing the remaining webpages for the site. I'm a professional web developer, artist and wire sculptor. These are the technical skills to which I'm referring to.

I would consider myself a skilled amateur photographer who's looking to improve, as I do other things to pay the bills.

When my profile was in the process of getting approved by the moderators, I had to rewrite it two times so that they could see a focus on photography.

As for the the request for so much information from a potential escort:

After the experience of four paid photoshoots whereby the quality of the pics suffered as a result of the escort's presence [model claimed that boyfriend escort was her cousin, insecure husband follows me around during the shoot, behind my back, jealous boyfriend just shows up unannounced and takes issue with everything the model's wearing for the shoot], I made a business decision of not having anyone who isn't involved in the photoshoot sitting in my home office.

If said potential escort opts for dropping the model off, and coming back when the photoshoot is done, well that's preferable to my having him removed from the premises because he decides to act the fool.

FaceReality,

So says the man with a gymnast crotch shot as an avatar. I will say that she does look like she's enjoying herself. I just hope that no one asks if you'd had sex with her based on their warped perception of you or her based on a rumor.

Please update me on the results of your rumor study. I'm certain that your findings will be quite enlightening.

Doug,

You make my point exactly. The cease and desist letter is just waiting until I have the identity of the people spreading these rumors.

TXPhotog,

Yes, you got it right. Yes, hard to believe. Yes, I found it rather petty when I found out about it. If not for the problems that this nonsense has created for at least one model that I'd shot with, I wouldn't have even dignified this bullshit with a response.

C R Photography,

It reads pretty neutral to me. I'm shooting for content on three websites that I'm developing, and the shoots scheduled are paid.

Why should I be compelled to have someone on set who could be potentially disruptive to the shoot, all because the model I'd contacted chose to trust in the false sense of security of an escort instead of taking the time to review my work, talk to some of the other models that I'd shot with and ask me questions before the shoot?

Cristina,

Whatever works. I have a home office. With thousands of dollars worth of valuable computer and other equipment. Nuff said.

Sep 18 06 10:53 am Link

Model

Cristina Ashley

Posts: 1294

Buffalo, Illinois, US

A Twisted Mind wrote:
Cristina,

Whatever works. I have a home office. With thousands of dollars worth of valuable computer and other equipment. Nuff said.

I wouldn't EVER give out that information to a guy who can't even crop a photo right.

Sep 18 06 11:03 am Link

Photographer

ATMPhotos

Posts: 1565

Brooklyn, New York, US

Cristina Ashley wrote:
I wouldn't EVER give out that information to a guy who can't even crop a photo right.

I never said I was a professional photographer. I also didn't comment about your experience as a model.

Insulting the quality of my work doesn't invalidate my point. Let's stay on topic, please.

The prospect of a potentially hostile stranger in my home office is disturbing enough that I've taken measures to prevent it.

Sep 18 06 11:11 am Link

Photographer

George Butler

Posts: 327

Marietta, Georgia, US

WoW, how about we call in a surgeon after all of that.

I don't remember Twisted Mind being asked to be critiqued, but that is the high and mighty for yah.

Regardless of someone's level of skills or lack there of, there is no basis for rumors. At the very least the folks here did say how the felt in plain view.

Sep 18 06 11:14 am Link

Model

Cristina Ashley

Posts: 1294

Buffalo, Illinois, US

A Twisted Mind wrote:
based on rumors told to you by photographers who are so insecure in the quality of their work, that they have to make shit up. Good luck with that.

Whose to say these photographers are 'insecure' about their work?

I've had photographers tell me to not work with other photographers-not because of the way they might act during shoots but because of the quality of photos. I looked at it as them looking out for my best interests as a 'model'.....and that doesn't mean they are slamming other people so I work with them instead.

Maybe they stepped out of line by saying the models were coerced. But maybe instead of attacking these so called 'insecure' photographers....you should have the models who you have worked with back you up with a good reference.

Sep 18 06 11:30 am Link

Photographer

ATMPhotos

Posts: 1565

Brooklyn, New York, US

Cristina Ashley wrote:
Whose to say these photographers are 'insecure' about their work?

I've had photographers tell me to not work with other photographers-not because of the way they might act during shoots but because of the quality of photos. I looked at it as them looking out for my best interests as a 'model'.....and that doesn't mean they are slamming other people so I work with them instead.

Maybe they stepped out of line by saying the models were coerced. But maybe instead of attacking these so called 'insecure' photographers....you should have the models who you have worked with back you up with a good reference.

Well, their asking unwarranted, off the cuff, questions about the model's sex life, which isn't any of their business, based on their perception of how she willingly posed with another photographer seems like a big clue to me.

So, there was never a discussion about the quality of my pics. If so, these people could have left me a tag, commented on the pics or sent me a private message.

Instead, they are speculating on how many of the models that appear in my profile that I might have had sex with. Seems to reek of insecurity to me.

People are making assumptions about her character based on these rumors. I didn't address it earlier because I had no idea that this was going on.

This doesn't strike me as these people looking out for her best interest.

I guess you haven't had that happen to you. Not a pleasant experience.

I've already stated my reasons for atacking them, so I'm not going to repeat myself.

Sep 18 06 12:36 pm Link

Model

Kaitlin Lara

Posts: 6467

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

TXPhotog wrote:

So let me see if I have this straight:

You are asserting that there are photographers out there somewhere who are so intimidated by the quality of your work that they have to "make shit up" about you to keep models from flocking to your door?

Did I get that right?

I took a look at your portfolio, so I'll ask again:  did I get that right?

Lol...oh TXPhotog...you took the words right out of my mouth. Get off your high horse pal...no one would be intimidated by your work. That blows that people are lying about you...but for real...you're making yourself look very foolish.

Sep 18 06 12:52 pm Link

Photographer

Tony Lawrence

Posts: 21528

Chicago, Illinois, US

This isn't to bash you at all but some of your images seem a bit like you
burst through the bathroom door and shot a gotcha level photo.  I tried
that with my wife and my left eye still hurts from her punch.  You can't stop
people from talking about you but you can change how you react to it.
I mean to say, you don't have to respond at all and for sure not on a open
message forum.  It says it bothers you and to some people suggests it may have
a bit of truth.  Don't start asking models to respond for you.  Continue to act
in a above board manner.  If you know for sure who's saying these things then
maybe ask them why but be prepared for a few shocks.  If they say models
are telling them these things then don't start asking who and when.  Examine
how your shoots have gone and consider how you may have added to this
problem.

Sep 18 06 12:57 pm Link

Model

Kaitlin Lara

Posts: 6467

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

By the way...to be my usual "walk in someone else's shoes" self...have you ever thought that maybe you did unintentionally coerce a model into something she wasn't comfortable with? It's entirely possible that a model was uncomfortable with something you were doing but was too shy to say so...that doesn't justify the spreading of rumors...but maybe instead of posting an angry thread about it, you should be examining yourself and asking yourself...is there something I may have done to help cause this? Also...your photos really don't help dispute that rumor, nor does your profile. Your photos are very amateur-looking and have very sexual undertones (or overtones in some cases), and your profile strongly discourages models bringing escorts. You can't control what others say about you...but you can control what you say about yourself.

Sep 18 06 01:02 pm Link

Photographer

Curt at photoworks

Posts: 31812

Riverside, California, US

I'm putting this post here (from where I originally posted on Star's RANT thread).  I don't think it's a good idea to basically do the same issue in two different places, but I think my question about calling the attorney is relevant. It looks like the OP is more likely to see it here.

A Twisted Mind wrote:
Here's my contribution:
A group of photographers have been spreding rumors about me, claiming that I've been forcing the models shown in my profile into posing in ways that they are uncomfortable with, in addition to tricking models into posing nude.

Some of these same photographers have also harrassed a model that posed for me nude, asking her if we'd had sex.

As a result of some models believing this bullshit, I've had sudden no-shows after contacting models about paid work for one of my websites.

I seriously question the quality of their work if they've got the time to try to get models to pose for them by making shit up and slandering me.

I'm waiting for an opportunity to find out who these photographers are so I can confront them.

This is a very serious story. But I'm not quite following some of this... how do you know that photographers have told models this?  If the answer is "the models told you" then do you mean you haven't asked the models who the photographers were?  I don't understand how you know all that you do without knowing who the photographers are.

So this is slander. You have a business. It's impacting the conduct of your business. What has your attorney told you? (please don't tell me that all this is happening and you haven't consulted your attorney!!!)

Sep 18 06 01:17 pm Link

Photographer

Tony Lawrence

Posts: 21528

Chicago, Illinois, US

Twisted mind I just read some of your replies.  I'm not intrested in those
who asked the questions or made the comments but how you responded.  Pretend
for a moment you were someone else and read those words, what would you
think.  To me some of your reponses are shrill and defensive.  If you've done
nothing wrong move on.  Forget letters to people.  Forget contacting people
unless again you know for sure what was said and by whom and then just ask
them.   There may be things you are doing that are adding to the problem.  Here
is a old saying, where theres smoke theres fire.

Sep 18 06 01:19 pm Link

Photographer

Chili

Posts: 5146

Brooklyn, New York, US

you cannot really tell by looking at an image to determine if someone is being physically or mentally forced to pose/participate in the shoot

as alway, there are 2 sides to every rumor/story, and countless reasons for models flaking

after meeting you, looking over your port...etc etc, why do you think its 'inconceiveable' that a model actually changes their mind and doesnt showup?

(its more 'inconceivable' to me that the models were coerced by other 'jealous' photogs not to shoot with you)

BTW, its also inconceivable that the dread pirate roberts will show up too

i could easily see by looking over your port, the rumors COULD BE (or are probably) more likely "dont waste your time shooting with him, you're not going to get anything worthwhile"

and if a model were to ask me if she should do a shot with you, (unless you were offering a "significant" amount of cash) i would tell her "why bother?"

im just saying

Sep 18 06 01:27 pm Link

Photographer

Image K

Posts: 23400

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Tony Lawrence wrote:
Twisted mind I just read some of your replies.  I'm not intrested in those
who asked the questions or made the comments but how you responded.  Pretend
for a moment you were someone else and read those words, what would you
think.  To me some of your reponses are shrill and defensive.  If you've done
nothing wrong move on.  Forget letters to people.  Forget contacting people
unless again you know for sure what was said and by whom and then just ask
them.   There may be things you are doing that are adding to the problem.  Here
is a old saying, where theres smoke theres fire.

Exactly!

Please, go and get an attorney. He will laugh you out of his office! In court, you have to PROVE your case. And, then, you have to prove DAMAGES. Good luck with that.

You can't live your life worried about what people are saying behind your back. You will go insane.

The "defending a false rape charge" analogy is a bad example. I would be forced, BY LAW, to defend a sexual assault, which is a serious crime. You have been accused of something far less serious.

You need to grow a thicker skin. This is just a little drama, dude.

Let it go.

Sep 18 06 01:31 pm Link

Photographer

Image K

Posts: 23400

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

"I'm not losing sleep, but failing to challenge the lies allows for people to assume that the rumors are true"

Very UNTRUE statement.

People that know you would not believe any such allegation.

People that don't know you: Who cares what they think?

Sep 18 06 01:34 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

A Twisted Mind wrote:
As for models who've heard these rumors and flaked out on me as a result: go ahead and miss out on paid work based on rumors told to you by photographers who are so insecure in the quality of their work, that they have to make shit up.

Oh boy does this kinda (rumors and propaganda) shit ring true.  I was approached by a photoday model a few years back who told me an 'interesting story'.  Seems she was confronted by a photographer who had a genuine dislike for 'Gary at Select Models'.  He informed her that ALL photographers attending his photoshoots have lengthy prison records, with previous convictions of murder, rape and child molestation... LMAO... wink 

If the truth be known, I have actually banned two photographers and one model from attending our events.  One photographer (in Orange County) ended up selling thousands of T-shirts, coffee mugs and calendars (off his website) of models he shot at our events WITHOUT a model release or financial compensation for the model.  The second photographer (in Malibu) lured models to his beach house with beautiful photos of the coastline and forced them to dance around like fairies, posing in transparent clothes and slingshot swimsuits before the front door was unlocked, allowing them to leave.  One model (a rather tall, body building dominatrix) lured several 'short statured' photographers to her apartment in Chatsworth, forcing them to strip nekked.  She had 'her photographer' shoot photos of her torturing our photographers (a few of them have been known to be clueless GWCs) with whips and fetish gear while they were chained up in her dungeon... wink

Sep 18 06 01:39 pm Link

Model

Mistriss de morte

Posts: 620

Wilmington, Delaware, US

let me say one thing, i think your photography sucks.
(though i'm sure with practice you can get better)
and i suppose one of the models you worked with, you made her feel uncomfortable in some and she told others, so that you would not make them feel uncomfortable.
it's probably not photographers because from what i've observed is the phtogs on here don't give flying f*ck about anyone elses work (except models and those that are role models to them ofcourse).
so this post was pointless in my opion. you should've just found out who was spreading the rumors privately and dealt with it in a more adult manor.

Sep 18 06 01:42 pm Link

Photographer

Tony Lawrence

Posts: 21528

Chicago, Illinois, US

Miz Beth wrote:
let me say one thing, i think your photography sucks.
(though i'm sure with practice you can get better)
and i suppose one of the models you worked with, you made her feel uncomfortable in some and she told others, so that you would not make them feel uncomfortable.
it's probably not photographers because from what i've observed is the phtogs on here don't give flying f*ck about anyone elses work (except models and those that are role models to them ofcourse).
so this post was pointless in my opion. you should've just found out who was spreading the rumors privately and dealt with it in a more adult manor.

Well, Beth don't hold back tell us how you really feel.

Sep 18 06 01:44 pm Link

Model

Mistriss de morte

Posts: 620

Wilmington, Delaware, US

Tony Lawrence wrote:

Well, Beth don't hold back tell us how you really feel.

lol
i always said honesty is the best policy

Sep 18 06 01:50 pm Link

Photographer

Image K

Posts: 23400

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

"you cannot really tell by looking at an image to determine if someone is being physically or mentally forced to pose/participate in the shoot"

"as alway, there are 2 sides to every rumor/story, and countless reasons for models flaking"

EXACTLY!

The bottom line is this: We don't know this OP from a hole-in-the-ground. He came to the wrong place looking for defenders!

Sep 18 06 01:51 pm Link

Photographer

Image K

Posts: 23400

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Miz Beth wrote:

lol
i always said honesty is the best policy

You tell 'em, Beth!

Sep 18 06 01:52 pm Link

Photographer

Curt at photoworks

Posts: 31812

Riverside, California, US

Image K wrote:
Please, go and get an attorney. He will laugh you out of his office! In court, you have to PROVE your case. And, then, you have to prove DAMAGES. Good luck with that.
....

I encouraged him to see an attorney earlier.  More, I was assuming he would have given the nature of the problem and waiting for his answer.  I think seeing an attorney is 1) prudent given the perceived nature of this and 2) the best reality therapy a person can get (whether you have a case or not).

Ranting about it here will serve little purpose.

Sep 18 06 01:57 pm Link

Photographer

ATMPhotos

Posts: 1565

Brooklyn, New York, US

Kaitlin Lara,

Remember when you commented about people believing that you were anorexic based on their perceptions of your pics, due to your weight? Why did you go to the trouble of stating that you weren't anorexic? I think I distinctly remember you posting in your profile that you have a naturally fast metabolism. You also defended your pics.

Answer those questions, and I'll explain to you why I feel the need to address this issue the way that I have.

I didn't ask for the unwarranted attempt of psychoanalysis on your part. Nice try though. Maybe you'll get better at it when you get a little older.

As for

"...unintetionally coerce a model into something she wasn't comfortable..."?

Considering how carefully I screen the models that I actually shoot with, either the model is comfortable with shooting with me, or she chooses to work with another photographer.

Tony,

I didn't realize you were a battered man. How long has your wife been beating you? There are men's rights groups online that are available to help you. I can put you in touch with them if you send me a private message. lol....

"...Don't start asking models to respond for you..."

You know, that blow to your head from your wife may have affected your reading comprehension. Have you seen a doctor yet? lol....

I never asked models to respond for me in this thread. I'm asking the photographers who made these statements to contact me.

...If they say models are telling them these things then don't start asking who and when....

I don't think it would be prudent of me not to investigate the matter, in order to get as many details about this situation as is possible. These people essentially attacked me covertly and I'm seeing overt results.

What's to stop people from assuming the truth of these rumors if I don't address them? Again, I ask, and granted, this is an extreme example, would you remain silent in the face of false accusations of rape or child molestation?

Sep 18 06 02:00 pm Link

Photographer

Image K

Posts: 23400

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Curt Burgess wrote:

I encouraged him to see an attorney earlier.  More, I was assuming he would have given the nature of the problem and waiting for his answer.  I think seeing an attorney is 1) prudent given the perceived nature of this and 2) the best reality therapy a person can get (whether you have a case or not).

Ranting about it here will serve little purpose.

That's life in America for you!

When in doubt, sue!

Alleging something is one thing. PROVING a silly "he-said, she-said" allegation like this is something else entirely.

Sep 18 06 02:02 pm Link

Model

Mistriss de morte

Posts: 620

Wilmington, Delaware, US

What's to stop people from assuming the truth of these rumors if I don't address them? Again, I ask, and granted, this is an extreme example, would you remain silent in the face of false accusations of rape or child molestation?

HELLO, are you in court facing rape charges, are you?

Sep 18 06 02:04 pm Link