|
Forums >
General Industry >
Gemma Ward :Goddess in the Making or Kinda Geeky ?
Well? Aug 15 06 10:18 pm Link No opinions at all? Aug 16 06 10:08 am Link Who?  Aug 16 06 10:09 am Link she's been a goddess for quite a while now. Aug 16 06 10:09 am Link A little too pixie like for me. But I guess I could take her photo if pushed Aug 16 06 10:11 am Link who? Aug 16 06 10:18 am Link Melvin Moten Jr wrote: That waif supermodel who's like everywhere..God! I hate her! Aug 16 06 10:21 am Link i can't believe you people don't know who she is! http://supermodels.nl/gemmaward she's a famous super model from australia. amazing face! Aug 16 06 10:23 am Link The face is outright dorky. She looks computer-generated. Aug 16 06 10:23 am Link I think she rocks...she can pull off an innocent little girl look or a sultry vixen. Another one I like who is similar is Cintia Dicker...great redhead with freckles! Honestly, it takes a different look to set you apart in this business. Yes, she has wide-set eyes and a tiny mouth...almost like an anime character, but it makes her stand out from the conventional beauties out there. Aug 16 06 10:23 am Link jade83 wrote: She does kinda look computer-generated! Lol! The Gemma 2000! Many would say her face is "dorky" but in the high fashion world it works. They never want simply "pretty" Aug 16 06 10:45 am Link she is my absolute favorite model ever, quite the godess. Aug 16 06 10:48 am Link since when is a teenage goddess not geeky? its almost universal outside hollywood and glamour where fame comes from the pursuit of ho-dom instead. Aug 16 06 10:48 am Link Fluffytek wrote: This is the funniest thing I've read all morning. Aug 16 06 10:49 am Link what a face...  Aug 16 06 10:49 am Link I'm sorry but until I see her nude I cant comment on whether I would consider her a good model to add to my port. Aug 16 06 10:59 am Link i prefer to think of her as my future wife. Aug 16 06 11:02 am Link Christopher Bush wrote: You dont mind me shooting your wife naked then? Aug 16 06 11:04 am Link She is a cute kid. Aug 16 06 11:04 am Link Garry k wrote: In the words of Saint Dogbert, "That's not an or question." Aug 16 06 11:12 am Link eyelight wrote: Cute cheeks too! Aug 16 06 01:35 pm Link UdoR wrote: Posting this gave me an idea to shoot my own spin on it.... Aug 16 06 01:39 pm Link She's cute. I like her  Aug 16 06 01:39 pm Link a goddess, she is not Aug 16 06 01:39 pm Link Garry k wrote: the girl is heavenly......you couldnt wish for a more beautiful model. a HUGE presence on camera for such a young girl, phenominal skin, beautiful body, amazing freindly personality, a hard worker, and not on bit an 'alien' some people refer to her as. she wants to be an actress and is continuing to study acting......im sure will be on our movie screens in many famous movies long into all of our lifetimes....her star has not finished shining yet... Aug 16 06 01:56 pm Link Fluffytek wrote: we can negotiate. Aug 16 06 02:29 pm Link jade83 wrote: Im so sorry, I didnt know you were blind! Aug 16 06 02:50 pm Link i love gemma.. but im more of a heather marks fan. Aug 16 06 03:10 pm Link gavin oneill wrote: I can't quite imagine her acting though although she's a great model. It sucks but there's a stigma with models becoming actors. Just never really seems to work out. Aug 16 06 10:25 pm Link Yeah, she's geeky...she reminds me of a Japanese cartoon character. It's a shame we don't have the girls like we use to. What ever happened to the likes of the 90's supermodel (excluding Cindy Crawford & Elle McPherson)? There's obviously a drought of girls....if Donatella is featuring Christy Turlington in her fall campaign...Linda Evangelista is on the current cover of Vogue...and Kate Moss is featured on six different campaigns. GET A CLUE MODELING AGENCY FOLKS. The fashion industry is trying to hold onto the girls of the past...because the new girls aren't up to par. The new girls don't sell...IMO. Aug 16 06 10:33 pm Link ANNABELLA wrote: gavin oneill wrote: I can't quite imagine her acting though although she's a great model. It sucks but there's a stigma with models becoming actors. Just never really seems to work Aug 16 06 11:53 pm Link One of them chistled folks, kinda looking the same here and there. far as knowing who she is... well I think theres alot of guys who see a cute face and move on. Course I've never been a fan of models who walk around with an emotion-less face most of their career, those that do... have a body but no spark behind them to ignite an image. Aug 17 06 01:27 am Link Garry k wrote: ANNABELLA wrote: gavin oneill wrote: I can't quite imagine her acting though although she's a great model. It sucks but there's a stigma with models becoming actors. Just never really seems to work There's exceptions to every rule. But let's not forget Cindy, Naomi and Giselle (recently in The Devil Wears Prada.YECH! She did awful) Aug 17 06 01:38 am Link i love gemma she is beyond wordsAug 17 06 01:49 am Link eyelight wrote: that doesn't look like your "own spin" on it! it looks like you copied the concept completely! why would you want to do that and not something of your own? just a thought... hmm Aug 17 06 01:53 am Link In looking over her pix on the links posted above, I would lean towards "goddess" with a little geekiness thrown in. However, I kinda like that look. :-) I'd shoot her. Think she would work TFCD? LOL! Aug 17 06 04:04 am Link I would marry her, if I could! Gemma Ward, Caroline Trentini, Jessica Stam and Heather Marks are one of the (indirect) reasons why Lindsay in my portfolio got her Vogue cover. JAY carreon PHOTOGRAPHER Aug 17 06 05:55 am Link My fave model is Ana Beatriz Barrios. (I think thats it) i love her. Aug 17 06 07:46 am Link TrueHorror wrote: I believe its Barros Aug 17 06 08:18 pm Link LMA wrote: I guess trying to learn from other succesful ideas isn't acceptable anymore (notice it's not in my port - just wanted to see how it would work in my rather limited studio setup)... oh well, my bad... Aug 17 06 08:27 pm Link |
