mikell wrote:
announced an 18+ the other day 7 views in 5 mins.

There ya go.

~Krista~ wrote:
Did someone say b(o)(o)bies?

Yes, I didn't spell it in the MM-approved way, but I'm tired.

Vivus Denuo wrote:

Yes, I didn't spell it in the MM-approved way, but I'm tired.

Well, we keep tabs on this stuff...so just remember to do it the GWC way next time, or we will make secret tabs on your boobie vs. b(o)(o)bie count and if you show a pattern of non mm approved boobie wording we will have to remove you.

~Krista~ wrote:

Well, we keep tabs on this stuff...so just remember to do it the GWC way next time, or we will make secret tabs on your boobie vs. b(o)(o)bie count and if you show a pattern of non mm approved boobie wording we will have to remove you.

LOL.  I am duly chastised.  Henceforth, I will speak only of b(o)(o)bies.  I mean, when speaking of b(o)(o)bies.

Pat Thielen wrote:
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it -- It's been my experience that it isn't just nudity that attracts attention to a photo. The most popular photos in my port, and the ones that get the most coments, are non-nudes. So, I think it just depends on the photo; there really is more to this than just seeing b(o)(o)bies (how's that?). I also think that some of the more popular models here on MM don't even do nudes.

  So there.

  -P-

Agreed... but since I now have LOOOOWWWW expectations about folks that want critiques, I always think, "well, the pics will probably be GWC shots in front of a sheet, but at least there might be some b(o)(o)bies to soothe the irritation to my eyes."

-jn

Pat Thielen wrote:
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it -- It's been my experience that it isn't just nudity that attracts attention to a photo. The most popular photos in my port, and the ones that get the most coments, are non-nudes. So, I think it just depends on the photo; there really is more to this than just seeing b(o)(o)bies (how's that?). I also think that some of the more popular models here on MM don't even do nudes.

I agree. I suspect that when the nudes on a port attract the most attention, it may be that the non-nude shots are simply not very good.

WG Rowland wrote:
"If you show them, they will come..."

What movie was that?  Field of Reams?  Ah, hell, I can't remember..

LOL!

VirtuaMike wrote:
Yeah same thing happened when I posted my new avatar.

That is indeed an eye-catching avatar!

northern clicker wrote:

Agreed... but since I now have LOOOOWWWW expectations about folks that want critiques, I always think, "well, the pics will probably be GWC shots in front of a sheet, but at least there might be some b(o)(o)bies to soothe the irritation to my eyes."

-jn

Well... the sad part to this is not all b(o)(o)bie pics soothe the eyes either. A GWC is still a GWC. For example, one night there was absolutely nothing on TV except for infomercials and "Baywatch." So, I tried -- I mean, I really tried to watch "Batwatch" and I couldn't. I think I did manage to get half-way through the thing, but despite all the eyecandy I just couldn't take it. Sometimes a bit of nudity just isn't enough...

  -P-

Pat Thielen wrote:
Sometimes a bit of nudity just isn't enough...

Agreed...maybe to horny old men boobies trump art, but as much as I like a nice set of boobs, I just don't think they make a photo worth looking at. In fact, I think men who aren't especially good at photography (or who just haven't gotten any in a while) should just not shoot boobs...when they do I think they end up even worse than clothed shots because they see nipples and their brains short circuit...that's why all my photos rock...if you get me topless it's no more exciting than shooting a guy :-P

Kaitlin Lara wrote:

Agreed...maybe to horny old men boobies trump art, but as much as I like a nice set of boobs, I just don't think they make a photo worth looking at. In fact, I think men who aren't especially good at photography (or who just haven't gotten any in a while) should just not shoot boobs...when they do I think they end up even worse than clothed shots because they see nipples and their brains short circuit...that's why all my photos rock...if you get me topless it's no more exciting than shooting a guy :-P

if i got you toppless i couldnt focus the camera...hell...i wouldnt even think of holding a camera.

BCG wrote:

if i got you toppless i couldnt focus the camera...hell...i wouldnt even think of holding a camera.

Have you seen my boobs? Well...of course you haven't...even if you were staring straight at them you probably wouldn't see them...lol...now my butt...that's another story

Vivus Denuo wrote:
and it drew a comment in about 6 nano-seconds.  See?  GWC is right.  Boobies trump art every time!

You rebel !

Kaitlin Lara wrote:

Have you seen my boobs? Well...of course you haven't...even if you were staring straight at them you probably wouldn't see them...lol...now my butt...that's another story

You also have a cute face and nice eyes.  I'll have to check out your butt!!

Pat Thielen wrote:

Well... the sad part to this is not all b(o)(o)bie pics soothe the eyes either. A GWC is still a GWC. For example, one night there was absolutely nothing on TV except for infomercials and "Baywatch." So, I tried -- I mean, I really tried to watch "Batwatch" and I couldn't. I think I did manage to get half-way through the thing, but despite all the eyecandy I just couldn't take it. Sometimes a bit of nudity just isn't enough...

  -P-

Next time turn the volume off.

Anjel Britt wrote:
sigh

i have nudes on my port!!
i have boobies pics!!
not many comments
though... i did get one that said  NICE TA TAS 

sigh

HEY
maybe i will post this on the anouncements and see if i get comments??

Same with me, if only it were so easy.  I shoot nudes but they don't seem to get many people excited.  Maybe if I could focus better... 

And Kaitlin, I think we need to see photographic proof of your claims to boobielessness.

Ivan123 wrote:
Same with me, if only it were so easy.  I shoot nudes but they don't seem to get many people excited.  Maybe if I could focus better...

Art nudes don`t get near as much attention as the more glamour style nudes here.I had some art nudes on my portfolio here and barely anyone looked at them but boy oh boy did they ever instantly hit on the pic of the girl with the hand bra!
And many who do comment on the art nudes wouldn`t know a good art nude from a bad one because they view of from the" is it hot, would it sell a product" point of view.
  I get a lot of attention and compliments on my art nudes on the art photography sites I am on like photo.net. Some of which got as many as 2-3k views in 24 hours or less.