Forums > General Industry > Are under aged models allowed to be in underwear?

Model

Diane ly

Posts: 1068

Manhattan, Illinois, US

theda wrote:

SHow a fully clothesd child to a pedafile. See how hey react.

They probably go to Olympus Fashioin Week and watch.  LOL tongue

Mar 04 06 01:07 am Link

Photographer

Christopher N.

Posts: 657

Troy, Michigan, US

Diana Moffitt wrote:
I am a bitter old hag and my time is almost up and I HATE IT!  LOL tongue

It must be late because "old" and "hag" don't seem to fit your pics. Especially considering if you're old I must be ancient.

(Then again, I do have this entry on my cell that says Moses and some strange 10 digit number ....)

Mar 04 06 01:08 am Link

Model

Diane ly

Posts: 1068

Manhattan, Illinois, US

I have to say I'm 19.  SHH...DON'T SAY A WORD!  LOL tongue

Mar 04 06 01:11 am Link

Model

CristinaLex

Posts: 1970

Silver Spring, Maryland, US

Diana Moffitt wrote:
I have to say I'm 19.  SHH...DON'T SAY A WORD!  LOL tongue

THATS OLD>>>??????? confused just turned twnety on christmas ????.lol

Mar 04 06 01:12 am Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

Diana Moffitt wrote:
I have to say I'm 19.  SHH...DON'T SAY A WORD!  LOL tongue

Officer! I swear, I thought she was older when I offered her the double vodka straight up. She downed it like a 40 years old alcoholic!

How could I not think that she's only 19?  Oh? The nude pix? Hell, did you see her boobies? I swear, when I... big_smile

Mar 04 06 01:16 am Link

Photographer

Christopher N.

Posts: 657

Troy, Michigan, US

Diana Moffitt wrote:
I have to say I'm 19.  SHH...DON'T SAY A WORD!  LOL tongue

Ok way off topic....but maybe this was getting too serious anyway.

You probably have to say that to old (40+), usually overweight and out of shape  photographers....Lord, the ironies....

Mar 04 06 01:17 am Link

Model

Diane ly

Posts: 1068

Manhattan, Illinois, US

Christopher N. wrote:

Ok way off topic....but maybe this was getting too serious anyway.

You probably have to say that to old (40+), usually overweight and out of shape  photographers....Lord, the ironies....

Hahhaa.  I know modeling is like kindergarten.  You have a bunch of older people managing young kids and telling them how they should dress, eat (or lack of), and act.  Ya gotta love it wink  LOL.

Mar 04 06 01:19 am Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

Christopher N. wrote:
You probably have to say that to old (40+),

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v200/UdoRPhotoArchive/MakingAPointGifs/finger.gif     big_smile

Mar 04 06 01:21 am Link

Model

Diane ly

Posts: 1068

Manhattan, Illinois, US

UdoR wrote:

Officer! I swear, I thought she was older when I offered her the double vodka straight up. She downed it like a 40 years old alcoholic!

How could I not think that she's only 19?  Oh? The nude pix? Hell, did you see her boobies? I swear, when I... big_smile

You're a naughty GTB!  LOL smile

Mar 04 06 01:23 am Link

Photographer

Christopher N.

Posts: 657

Troy, Michigan, US

UdoR wrote:

https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v200/UdoRPhotoArchive/MakingAPointGifs/finger.gif     big_smile

LOL...I'm almost there myself so that makes me somewhat part of this category (and therefore a hypocrite)

(but I do run 2.5 miles/day and work out 5x a week so I get just a wee bit of slack)

Mar 04 06 01:23 am Link

Photographer

lll

Posts: 12295

Seattle, Washington, US

CristinaLex wrote:
And that is just saying how sick the biz can be if adriane lima was a 17 year old lingerie model......just my 2ccceeennntttsss smile

How is it sick?!  At 17 year old girls can already have babies, and many are married in other countries (and plenty pregnant in this country, too).  17 year olds are capable adults in Europe and Asia who take responsibility for their actions.  Do girls just change like flicking a switch when they pass the 18th birthday?  Are people just sheeps they buy into that ridiculous rationale?  Holy smokes.

JC is right.

If you think 17 year old modeling lingerie is sick, this business is obviously not for you.  Ever read Vogue?  W?  V?  JC Penny doesn't advertise their teen underwear in your city?

Mar 04 06 01:25 am Link

Model

K-A

Posts: 724

Healdsburg, California, US

Steven Bigler wrote:
I was going to comment.. but there are simple too many fucking stupid peope here for me to bother with.

Such charm and diplomacy.

Mar 04 06 01:26 am Link

Model

Diane ly

Posts: 1068

Manhattan, Illinois, US

lll wrote:

How is it sick?!  At 17 year old girls can already have babies, and many are married in other countries (and plenty pregnant in this country, too).  17 year olds are capable adults in Europe and Asia who take responsibility for their actions.  Do girls just change like flicking a switch when they pass the 18th birthday?  Are people just sheeps they buy into that ridiculous rationale?  Holy smokes.

JC is right.

If you think 17 year old modeling lingerie is sick, this business is obviously not for you.  Ever read Vogue?  W?  V?  JC Penny doesn't advertise their teen underwear in your city?

Apparently she is talking about internet modeling where there are actual morals involved.  DUH.  LMAO tongue

Mar 04 06 01:26 am Link

Photographer

Visions Of Paradise

Posts: 379

Honolulu, Hawaii, US

ok people stupid question look at the little like one year old and up running arround on tv commercials in undies so there damn think befor you ask.

Mar 04 06 01:27 am Link

Photographer

lll

Posts: 12295

Seattle, Washington, US

Kristin Anne wrote:
Such charm and diplomacy.

That's Big for you, Kristin...  smile

Mar 04 06 01:29 am Link

Photographer

lll

Posts: 12295

Seattle, Washington, US

Axlf wrote:
ok people stupid question look at the little like one year old and up running arround on tv commercials in undies so there damn think befor you ask.

Baby porn!

Mar 04 06 01:29 am Link

Model

Diane ly

Posts: 1068

Manhattan, Illinois, US

Gotta love it smile

Mar 04 06 02:25 am Link

Photographer

bd miller

Posts: 88

Los Angeles, California, US

I think they can be in their underwear, but YOU can't be in their underwear. I think that's the rule. I dunno. It's different in Europe.

Mar 04 06 02:33 am Link

Photographer

Glamour Boulevard

Posts: 8628

Sacramento, California, US

This makes me wonder how many people were freaked out over the skit on either mad tv or saturday night live where these two moms were talking about how their babies pants look so bulky because of the big diapers and it turns out its a mock commercial for thong diapers and they had babies in diapers cut into thongs running allover the set. I personally laughed so hard I had tears,lol.

Mar 04 06 02:47 am Link

Photographer

William Coleman

Posts: 2371

New York, New York, US

Steven Bigler wrote:
I was going to comment.. but there are simple too many fucking stupid peope here for me to bother with.

When concerned with such questions... simply refer to the penal code.

When it comes to something bluenoses want to squelch, the penal code is not the best guide.  Even if the law is on your side, you may be arrested, jailed, bailed, investigated, have your computer seized and forensically searched, pay a lawyer thousands of dollars and go to trial.  You'll also lose your job, and your neighbors will only remember that you were charged with a sex crime involving children.  Then you'll be acquitted.  You've gone through months of hell and your life is ruined.  What good did referring to the penal code do you?

Mar 04 06 08:56 am Link