Forums > General Industry > Photographers who cross the line.

Photographer

j-shooter

Posts: 1912

San Francisco, California, US

studio L wrote:

E|||B wrote:
The term comes up again. And like a pedantic geek superhero, I must swoop-down as a caped crusader and preach like James Brown in The Blues Brothers.

I am completely supportive and encouraging of the idea of a model being accompanied to a photoshoot. However, I insist that their company be a "personal assistant" and not an "escort" or a "chaperone" - because I think the terminology is an important distinction to help models feel more secure, strong and empowered. I will NEVER allow an escort. Because I don't want to shoot with a little girl who feels like a "potential victim" going to a "potentially dangerous" situation being "escorted" by her boyfriend or mommy. And "chaperones" are for children on gradeschool fieldtrips. My photoshoots are not fieldtrips. I encourage "personal assistants" because I want my models to be people who are liberated, confident and strong and have "assistance" because they are so awesome and glorious.

Good post.

Words have meaning.

I too have no desire to shoot "potential victims". I too wish to shoot enpowered adventurous and self-aware models, or those who are seeking those qualities.

Jul 01 06 01:17 am Link

Photographer

j-shooter

Posts: 1912

San Francisco, California, US

I've only been shooting a few months. When do the models start asking me to have sex? Is it after my photoshop skills improve some more, lol!

smile

Jul 01 06 01:28 am Link

Photographer

Malloch

Posts: 2566

Hastings, England, United Kingdom

This chaperone business has been done to death on this site. Some like it others don't. Personally I feel if a model feels she needs a chaperone for her safety at a shoot she should not be there in the first place. I have had my share of bad experinces so I no longer allow chaperones (except when required by law for models underage) on a shoot. I have had equipment and cash stolen, had to tell some to leave with the model because of constant interference during the shoot (and this was not limited to boyfriends and husbands), models wanting me to pay the chaperones expenses on location shoots abroad. Also as I have mentioned on this site several times chaperones in the studio complex or on location are not covered by my insurance. Therefore the model must have liability insurance cover for them, which none of them seem to have.

Jul 01 06 01:55 am Link

Photographer

S1studio

Posts: 98

Union City, California, US

I don't think TFP photographers should be trusted, yet all the models on this site are here for TFP.

Jul 01 06 03:31 am Link

Photographer

R Michael Walker

Posts: 11987

Costa Mesa, California, US

Sairas Photography wrote:
I don't think TFP photographers should be trusted, yet all the models on this site are here for TFP.

What are YOU smoking?
Mike

Jul 01 06 03:35 am Link

Photographer

S1studio

Posts: 98

Union City, California, US

I guess you do TFP... I said that based on experiences of a few of my models.

Jul 01 06 03:38 am Link

Model

Jane Weiss

Posts: 2027

Nottingham, England, United Kingdom

Sairas Photography wrote:
I don't think TFP photographers should be trusted, yet all the models on this site are here for TFP.

she's right... if someone likes my work that much they really would pay me if i declined tfp because i was too busy or didn't need it at the moment. they'd atleast offer part pay or some other incentive. the ones who only ever shoot tfp are the ones that are after a free model no matter what the quality of her work. its strange. not perverted or untrustworthy... it just raises my eyebrows slightly.

Jul 01 06 03:44 am Link

Photographer

J C ModeFotografie

Posts: 14718

Los Angeles, California, US

Sairas Photography wrote:
I guess you do TFP... I said that based on experiences of a few of my models.

Yes, Sairas - what indeed are you smoking?  The real trouble comes in when you have models who don't know good photography from bad photography - so they do TFP with guys who aren't really in it for their photography and hence arent' trustworthy.  All but a few of the images on MY portfolio are from tests - are you saying I'm not trustworthy?  Perhaps you are speaking of models' bad experiences with you!

JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER

Jul 03 06 02:50 am Link

Photographer

J C ModeFotografie

Posts: 14718

Los Angeles, California, US

Sian Louise wrote:

she's right... if someone likes my work that much they really would pay me if i declined tfp because i was too busy or didn't need it at the moment. they'd atleast offer part pay or some other incentive. the ones who only ever shoot tfp are the ones that are after a free model no matter what the quality of her work. its strange. not perverted or untrustworthy... it just raises my eyebrows slightly.

I can understand about your wanting to get paid for artistic nude work - the understanding there is that you will be signing a model release so that the photographer can use the resulting images commercially (sell prints of it, for example).  But those of us who shoot fashion need a way to build and refresh our portfolios without it costing us an arm and a leg.  It's an even exchange - since everyone participating in the test is to receive pics for their portfolios.

JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER

Jul 03 06 02:53 am Link

Photographer

J C ModeFotografie

Posts: 14718

Los Angeles, California, US

Eric S. wrote:

theda wrote:
Are they named Eric?

Theda, I lived in Miami for 2 years, so the fact that you say "Eric" can be misleading in a thread like this, so please clearly state you are referring to another Eric in South Florida, because honestly, your comment was quite slanderous.
I'm horrified to think I could be associated with such scumbags...


I sincerely hope that all of you start being more specific about who you're referring to, because using someone's first name in a VERY negative thread like this is wrong. If you people know something, just say it, so finally everyone can come forward and lay their hands out on the table.

To all of you - I have never heard anything bad about Eric Striffler, his reputation is unimpeachable.  I should know, as I have been moving more or less within the same photographic circles as he has for years.

JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER

Jul 03 06 03:07 am Link

Photographer

JM Dean

Posts: 8931

Cary, North Carolina, US

HUH, lets dig up another thread that is a year old smile

Jul 03 06 03:15 am Link

Model

Angela G

Posts: 376

Los Angeles, California, US

Adonis G wrote:
Why aren't more girls coming out and either calling the Police or doing something about it. I have heard a few stories about some guys down here in Florida, and I CAN NOT understand why the girls stay quiet??

A guy in east central Florida, who gets (

Jul 03 06 04:26 am Link

Photographer

D Freeman

Posts: 490

Fresno, California, US

Sairas Photography wrote:
I don't think TFP photographers should be trusted, yet all the models on this site are here for TFP.

You *can't* be this stupid.  A few models(whom you barely know I'm sure) tell you horror stories, and your conclusion is that all TFP photogs are predators?  What about the 20 models who *didn't* have horror stories?  Did you just discount them, or did you just assume that they're keeping all the good stuff to themselves?  If you are unwilling or unable to think for yourself, then please, PLEASE hand in your ovaries.  The last thing we need are more of you lemmings running around.

With the exception of one model, everything in my port was shot on a TFP basis.. am I not to be trusted because of that?  Based on what?

I know this doesn't jive with what your short-haired womens history prof's told you, but..
All men are not predators.
All men with cameras are not predators.
All men with cameras who help new models by shooting TFP are not predators.

I'm even going to go out on a limb and say that most of the models who bring along an "escort" are doing so because they're too lazy to check references.  If they had checked the references, then they wouldn't feel the need to bring an "escort" because... 

...they would either know that:
a.) The photog is a creep, and that they should stay away.
b.) The photog is not a creep, and it's safe to shoot with them.

Neither of those options requires an escort.

Jul 03 06 05:50 am Link

Photographer

Terrence Blount

Posts: 379

Chicago, Illinois, US

Sairas Photography wrote:
I don't think TFP photographers should be trusted, yet all the models on this site are here for TFP.

Only a full-time photographer that's makes his/her living shooting would say something like that. Some of us photographers that are not popularly known or getting started use TFPs to get their feet in the door. Eventually at some point when they've spent enough money on studio rental, stylist, and other miscellaneous expenses that they would no longer do TFPs.

Jul 03 06 06:30 am Link

Photographer

Natalie Photography

Posts: 161

Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada

What ever happened to Bob Shell? Did 12 people decided if he crossed the line or not?

Jul 03 06 06:48 am Link

Photographer

Jim Ball

Posts: 17632

Frontenac, Kansas, US

Terrence Blount wrote:

Only a full-time photographer that's makes his/her living shooting would say something like that. Some of us photographers that are not popularly known or getting started use TFPs to get their feet in the door. Eventually at some point when they've spent enough money on studio rental, stylist, and other miscellaneous expenses that they would no longer do TFPs.

TFP is like piano practice.

A concert pianist gets paid very well for his or her performances, but must practice constantly between performances to keep their skills honed razor sharp.  Nobody pays that pianist to practice.

If a photographer or model is fortunate enough to be booked constantly for paid work, then fine and good--they probably do not need much practice.  If they are not getting booked, then they need to practice for the same reasons the pianist does.  TFP is practice for models and photographers.

Jul 03 06 07:55 am Link

Photographer

DarioImpiniPhotography

Posts: 8756

Dallas, Texas, US

Angela G wrote:

I found this on the Web:

http://www.adultforums.com/plus/plus.mi … 2014941473

It's very specific, but it might not be complete.  I'm sure there are more predators out there.

Shoot me before I get like this guy.  Not with a camera I mean.

https://members.aol.com/NYSTalents/claireme1.jpg

Jul 03 06 08:05 am Link

Photographer

ChristopherRoss

Posts: 1559

Eškašem, Badakhshan, Afghanistan

Sairas Photography wrote:
I don't think TFP photographers should be trusted, yet all the models on this site are here for TFP.

If my market could support full time photographers you may have a point but it can't, and many many markets can't. What few photographers we have in our small community don't shoot full time and when we do it's often with inexperienced models who have very little future in the business. 

Should we bill them top rate for our time? Pay them despite their lack of skills? or accept that to keep our skills crisp, we should do TFP work with them?

Jul 03 06 08:17 am Link

Photographer

Bp3 Images

Posts: 172

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

Terrence Blount wrote:

Sairas Photography wrote:
I don't think TFP photographers should be trusted, yet all the models on this site are here for TFP.

Last year I spent alot of money working with some great models. Paid shoots for them. I've bought equipment, went to workshops, hours spent on PS and much more to build up my portfolio and gain experience.

This year I shoot strictly tfp. Mostly from new models contacting me. And recently started getting some experienced models too. Although I could probably charge I don't. I remember when I started and am happy to do it.

So in my eyes Tfp can be an advantage to both the photog and model who are professional and in it for the long haul.

Bill

Jul 03 06 08:24 am Link

Photographer

Art Liem

Posts: 54

Los Angeles, California, US

Adonis G wrote:
Why aren't more girls coming out and either calling the Police or doing something about it. I have heard a few stories about some guys down here in Florida, and I CAN NOT understand why the girls stay quiet??

Ah, it's that classic why are women attracted to a$$holes question. Remember the gorgeous girl in highschool that went out with the jerk? Same thing.

This is an industry filled with those jerks.

Regards, Art.

Jul 03 06 11:41 am Link

Photographer

J C ModeFotografie

Posts: 14718

Los Angeles, California, US

Natalie Photography wrote:
What ever happened to Bob Shell? Did 12 people decided if he crossed the line or not?

It appears the Bob Shell trial has been scheduled for September 18th.  And no, I never did like his photography.

Here's the article: http://www.roanoke.com/news/roanoke/wb/xp-67980

JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER

Jul 04 06 06:10 am Link

Photographer

Image K

Posts: 23400

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Demarcus Freeman wrote:

You *can't* be this stupid.  A few models(whom you barely know I'm sure) tell you horror stories, and your conclusion is that all TFP photogs are predators?  What about the 20 models who *didn't* have horror stories?  Did you just discount them, or did you just assume that they're keeping all the good stuff to themselves?  If you are unwilling or unable to think for yourself, then please, PLEASE hand in your ovaries.  The last thing we need are more of you lemmings running around.

With the exception of one model, everything in my port was shot on a TFP basis.. am I not to be trusted because of that?  Based on what?

I know this doesn't jive with what your short-haired womens history prof's told you, but..
All men are not predators.
All men with cameras are not predators.
All men with cameras who help new models by shooting TFP are not predators.

I'm even going to go out on a limb and say that most of the models who bring along an "escort" are doing so because they're too lazy to check references.  If they had checked the references, then they wouldn't feel the need to bring an "escort" because... 

...they would either know that:
a.) The photog is a creep, and that they should stay away.
b.) The photog is not a creep, and it's safe to shoot with them.

Neither of those options requires an escort.

I couldn't agree more!

Jul 04 06 06:18 am Link

Photographer

Farenell Photography

Posts: 18832

Albany, New York, US

Sairas Photography wrote:
yet all the models on this site are here for TFP.

Because 90% of them are brokeass students.

Jul 04 06 07:52 am Link

Photographer

Bryan Benoit

Posts: 2106

Miami, Florida, US

Sairas Photography wrote:
I don't think TFP photographers should be trusted, yet all the models on this site are here for TFP.

I agree... YOU DON'T THINK.

Sorry for being so harsh but general statements like this show very poor judgement. I shoot TFCD and I charge... what does that make me? A split personality photographer?

I still do TFCD because while my pics are fairly decent they are not quite at the level that I want them to be. I have another job that pays the bills so I can afford to give models breaks with TFCD on occasion and it gives me the chance to try new stuff that I couldn't do while shooting for a paying client.

I love shooting... if I have the opportunity to work with someone that I like I will do it even if I don't get $$$. Great images are sometimes more than enough.

Bryan

PS: I have it from very good sources that the Eric S. that has posted on this thread is a stand up guy with a reputation of gold. People should be more careful when making 'half statements'.

Jul 04 06 08:20 am Link

Photographer

Art Schotz

Posts: 2879

Lima, Ohio, US

I know that lists are not allowed here on MM. There are several sites, as have already been mentioned, that allow you to list your complaints.  Some of those lists include both models and photogs.

And there are obvious methods to employ to avoid these situations, like always having an escort.

But if it's allowed, would a thread for models to simply list their names as references for situations they've experienced be allowed here?

That way, you could search for an area and contact models from that area to check out who is nice and who is not.  And you could check several models from the same area to see if there's any credibility to each particular story.  I suspect that predators don't usually stop after just one time.  Some repeatability would show up.

Using that sort of directory, you wouldn't be posting public accusations of anyone, only listing people whom you could reference to benefit from their experience.  It could even be it's own category, "Model Experiences"

It's just an idea that comes from too early in the morning and not enough coffee yet.

Jul 04 06 08:30 am Link

Photographer

Dalmar

Posts: 319

Miami, Florida, US

Sairas Photography wrote:
I guess you do TFP... I said that based on experiences of a few of my models.

How many models do you own?  Or did you mean you manage them?  What do you mean by "a few of my models"?

Jul 04 06 08:33 am Link

Photographer

Myke Newman

Posts: 31

Memphis, Tennessee, US

It's a shame that people like that exist. A model should never allow themselves to placed in such situations, but unfortunately it does occur. To all out there, be careful, if you feel uncomfortable with a photographer end the session and leave.

Jul 04 06 05:03 pm Link

Photographer

Myke Newman

Posts: 31

Memphis, Tennessee, US

It's a shame that people like that exist. A model should never allow themselves to placed in such situations, but unfortunately it does occur. To all out there, be careful, if you feel uncomfortable with a photographer end the session and leave.

Jul 04 06 05:08 pm Link