Forums > General Industry > The Full Monty

Photographer

Posts: 5264

New York, New York, US

Like me knoweses English.  Bo may know english but Mark is lost.

Jun 17 05 08:46 am Link

Photographer

Rick Edwards

Posts: 6185

Wilmington, Delaware, US

the plaster caster's toured their collection a few years back, from groupies hobby to gallery shows...lol

Jun 17 05 12:38 pm Link

Photographer

corbcn

Posts: 35

Cincinnati, Ohio, US

as an amatuer photographer i think it should be eaqual i use myself often and have included in my profile called awaiting sacrafice and i dont consider it in anyway pornographic

Jun 20 05 12:18 am Link

Model

Monty T. Dog

Posts: 79

Levittown, New York, US

My name is monty, and I am well fed which means I am full. I guess technically all of my photos are nudes. I will have to have some pictures taken with clothes on.

Jun 20 05 12:10 pm Link

Photographer

Todd Taulman

Posts: 131

Chicago, Illinois, US

I have never had a problem shooting male nudes. In certain respects it is more difficult to shoot a male nude than it is a female, simply due to the fact that for most of us, females are often a subject we are familiar with. But this has also made me wonder something else. Occassionally, I enjoy doing some nude modeling for my own work, partly because I can't find a male to pose for what I am wanting to shoot, and also because it is a new experience. Though as I get older, I am less interested in posing, as my body just isn't what it use to be. But with that said, I just shot a full nude of myself a couple weeks ago, but have been hesitant to display it, because it is a full frontal nude, and I would hate to be somehow shunned because I did some nude modeling and am a photographer. It seems to be more acceptable for a woman to do nude modeling and to be a photographer. But I have felt people would term me a "pervert". (maybe that's true....., but I don't want to be known that way)
Thoughts?........Anyone....hellooo?

Jun 20 05 03:52 pm Link