PlasticPuppet wrote:
However, if we were evolved from monkeys... well alot of this makes sense then, in the zoo I see them masterbating and flinging poo for no reason at all

It's a lot like ModelMayhem forums, really...

mjr.

Stormy1 wrote:
I don't care what they are doing..its none of my business.. but..THEY ARE ALL UGLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Is that the fat little gothchick pot with the shitty portfolio calling the girl in bondage kettle black or what?

GWC!

GWC wrote:

Is that the fat little gothchick pot with the shitty portfolio calling the girl in bondage kettle black or what?

GWC!

that was not called for, and i have nothing more to add.

BCG wrote:
"You really seem to be looking for a horror story that I [and the other D/s enthusiasts on the page] can't supply you with."




i seek not the horror stories, rather i seek understanding...i had the sh*t beat out of me in the SERE course, and found not pleasure nor sexual release in that, nor do i find pleasure sadistic behavior...i would however, like to understand the psychological aspects and ramifications.

Then you'll have to spend the rest of your life interviewing every Dom and Sub on earth...we all have different reasons for why we enjoy what we enjoy.  As for your having the "sh*t" beaten out of you...I would suggest a therapist:  You definitely seem to have a few unresolved issues that really have nothing to do with the BDSM community [no matter how much you'd like them to].

GWC wrote:

Is that the fat little gothchick pot with the shitty portfolio calling the girl in bondage kettle black or what?

GWC!

*snort...giggle...snicker*

BCG wrote:
tell that to the victims and the folks in the wake of carnage it leaves behind.

The Darwin Awards are awarded posthumously to those selfless enough to remove their genes from the human gene pool so that their inherent stupidity will not be passed on to future generations of humanity.  I believe one of their stipulations in making an award is that the recipient cannot have harmed anyone else in the actions that resulted in the award. 

If this is the case, then the Darwin Award recipients would leave no additional victims in their wake. 

But I suppose you're not a real fan of Charles Darwin, are ya?

BCG wrote:

tell that to the victims and the folks in the wake of carnage it leaves behind.

I know Moraxian was kind enough to spell it out, so there's no need to say that the above comment has absolutely nothing to do with mine, although it was referenced.

Unless, of course, the carnage being referred to are the ramifications of random acts of stupidity perpetrated on the rest of the cognizant public.

BCG wrote:
tell that to the victims and the folks in the wake of carnage it leaves behind.

Mayanlee wrote:
I know Moraxian was kind enough to spell it out, so there's no need to say that the above comment has absolutely nothing to do with mine, although it was referenced.

Unless, of course, the carnage being referred to are the ramifications of random acts of stupidity perpetrated on the rest of the cognizant public.

Indeed.  The Darwins are for random acts of stupidity that people perpetrate only on themselves.  The cognizant public must be unharmed in any way (well, they may make an exception for people pulling a muscle from laughing).

GWC wrote:

Is that the fat little gothchick pot with the shitty portfolio calling the girl in bondage kettle black or what?

GWC!

OMG!! LMAO.

Moraxian wrote:

BCG wrote:
tell that to the victims and the folks in the wake of carnage it leaves behind.

Indeed.  The Darwins are for random acts of stupidity that people perpetrate only on themselves.  The cognizant public must be unharmed in any way (well, they may make an exception for people pulling a muscle from laughing).

Well, here's one of them to illustrate the point:

(6 May 2004, Ukraine) Piling up live artillery ammunition is hard, grueling work, so it makes perfect sense that a group of soldiers would take a smoking break at lunchtime. The warehouse in southern Ukraine was filled with 92,000 tons of ammunition--until the soldiers lit up their cigarettes and inhaled deeply, ignoring warnings that smoking can cause cancer. They flicked the butts away and went back to work. The hot tobacco acted like a slow fuse, which started a small fire, which nobody noticed until a chain reaction of massive explosions began.
The explosions lasted for a week, tossing debris as far as 25 miles away, destroying buildings in a two-mile radius, and forcing the evacuation of thousands of nearby residents. Red-hot shrapnel set off additional fires in nearby towns and ruptured a minor gas pipeline. Total damage from the smoke break was estimated at $750 million.

Miraculously, only one of the soldiers at the arsenal died in the disaster. Six soldiers were charged with "grossly neglecting the fire safety rules and smoking on the ammunition site."

[Sidebar: News accounts say five people were killed by the explosions but only two were smoking. The nomination would be disqualified if "innocent bystanders" were injured. But an AP particle said four died from "health problems aggravated by the stress of the disaster." Novosti said six soldiers were charged with causing the fire, rather than two, and the only direct death was a guard at the facility. It's not clear if the guard was also smoking, or if the other four deaths were caused by the explosions, or simply ill health. Therefore, I am tentatively calling this a Darwin Award, despite some misgivings.]

Julie Andrea wrote:
Whats irritating is people looking and willing to be professional escorts or whores, are looking in a model- call web site. Its people like this that makes it hard for people to take actual models seriously. Its starting to piss me off.

I hope you aren't referring to the professional models/actresses that appear both on that site and this one.

Jeffrey Haas wrote:
Sadonecrobeastiality - Beating A Dead Horse...

LMAO.  Ok, I'm done.  Officially.  I think.

Julie Andrea wrote:
Whats irritating is people looking and willing to be professional escorts or whores, are looking in a model- call web site. Its people like this that makes it hard for people to take actual models seriously. Its starting to piss me off.

Yeah, and what really irritates me are "models" who put completely irrelevant personal information in their bios on model sites as if it were a bloody dating site and then expect to get taken seriously as an actual model.

If I'm hiring a model to pose for a catalogue, do I REALLY care what instrument she plays or what her favorite sports drink is? Or was that put in on the off chance someone here is really going to think you're trying to catch a date? Still the pot calling the kettle black again.  Same sh--, different words.

Jeffrey Haas wrote:
Sadonecrobeastiality - Beating A Dead Horse...

LOL... but maybe it could be amended to "Hipposadonecrobeastiality"

Supercallafrajalisticexpialadocious!

Mayanlee wrote:

Yeah, and what really irritates me are "models" who put completely irrelevant personal information in their bios on model sites as if it were a bloody dating site and then expect to get taken seriously as an actual model.

If I'm hiring a model to pose for a catalogue, do I REALLY care what instrument she plays or what her favorite sports drink is? Or was that put in on the off chance someone here is really going to think you're trying to catch a date? Still the pot calling the kettle black again.  Same sh--, different words.

Well said.