Photographer
Mangano Photography
Posts: 963
Fresno, California, US
Are there any other photographers who won't shoot nudes, or am I the only one??
Model
Jessalyn
Posts: 21433
Denver, Colorado, US
Dino Mangano wrote: Are there any other photographers who won't shoot nudes, or am I the only one?? this will obviously turn into a debate so you may as well explain WHY right now so you can just get it started with out all the usual dilly-dally.
Photographer
Sophistocles
Posts: 21320
Seattle, Washington, US
Photographer
Bryan Benoit
Posts: 2106
Miami, Florida, US
Jessalyn wrote:
this will obviously turn into a debate so you may as well explain WHY right now so you can just get it started with out all the usual dilly-dally. to the point. Love it. ;o)
Photographer
Jerry L Unger Photograp
Posts: 11
Jonesboro, Arkansas, US
I don't shot nudes. I have always thought that ones imagination makes the best palett. I like to supply the image, funny, seductive, sexy, strong, or whatever my choice happens to be. The story that the photograph reveals to you tells me a lot about who you are and where your head has been as a the viewer. I don't have a problem with those that do shoot nudes it is a free choice made by each one us. No matter what you shoot you are open to a vast selections of opinions. The set currently on my port, "Bar in Red" has been pretty well accepted but a person not in our business was on the site, saw the port, and showed up at the models place of work and called her a WHORE!. Note this was not a boy friend, a father, a friend or a family member, just some acquaintance. This tells me a lot about where this guys head is at. So to all of you, carry on with courage in your art and your view of life. We are created free to do so. You will find out things about others as they view your prints and tell you not the story of your art but more the story of their life. Thanks for the question and thanks for the chance to vent a little to fellow pros. Jerry
Photographer
Marc Rosebeck
Posts: 2281
Albany, New York, US
Ummm me, i can barely get the clothes off my wife, why bother(lol). Though i have been asked to shoot them in my style. Never had shot a nude model, how do i have that kind of style, too damn confused, i'll continue to shoot them clothes on. I need a cookie, i'll be back.
Photographer
grayagent
Posts: 546
Houston, Alaska, US
u tryin to get some attention or something? :- )... who cares if you don't? seriously...
Photographer
Pat Thielen
Posts: 16800
Hastings, Minnesota, US
I won't. Never! There's nothing more un-natural than the nude human form. It should be covered at all times and people should only have sex in the dark with a sheet between themselves. Nude photography is the gateway to other nude activities and so it should never be done under any circumstances. In fact, I think all animals should be forced to wear clothes as well. After all, if nudity is bad for humans it must be bad for other species as well. Yeah!!!!!
Photographer
Marc Rosebeck
Posts: 2281
Albany, New York, US
grayagent wrote: u tryin to get some attention or something? :- )... who cares if you don't? seriously... I was in here, saw jess and had a hankering for a cookie, oh the OP, yeah damn attention ho(lmao)
Photographer
elise L photography
Posts: 521
Provo, Utah, US
I won't shoot. To me, and this is my opinion, it's not art. just naked people. It just tells me that the photographer (no offense) isn't creative enough to shoot diff. things. but this is just my opinion, I know many think differently than I do. good day
Photographer
00siris
Posts: 19182
New York, New York, US
Pat Thielen wrote: I won't. Never! There's nothing more un-natural than the nude human form. It should be covered at all times and people should only have sex in the dark with a sheet between themselves. Nude photography is the gateway to other nude activities and so it should never be done under any circumstances. In fact, I think all animals should be forced to wear clothes as well. After all, if nudity is bad for humans it must be bad for other species as well. Yeah!!!!! well stated
Photographer
Ought To Be Shot
Posts: 1887
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
I will if someone asks me to shoot them, but I don't go looking to shoot nudes as a rule. The best photographs are the suggestive ones... the things you can't see.
Model
Jessalyn
Posts: 21433
Denver, Colorado, US
Marc Rosebeck wrote:
I was in here, saw jess and had a hankering for a cookie, oh the OP, yeah damn attention ho(lmao) more cookies arriving soon! I just made a fresh batch. And to the OP: I was nude when I made them. I like to cook nekkid. Photograph THAT.
Photographer
Sophistocles
Posts: 21320
Seattle, Washington, US
Elise Lundquist wrote: I won't shoot. To me, and this is my opinion, it's not art. just naked people. It just tells me that the photographer (no offense) isn't creative enough to shoot diff. things. but this is just my opinion, I know many think differently than I do. good day You're so right! Photographers who shoot fashion just don't have ANY creativity to present a nude. Those who insist that models wear clothing just don't get that it takes creativity to light skin and present it properly. They're just not creative enough! Oh. Wait. You meant it the other way around, didn't you? Damn. It's just SO HARD to tell the difference between things that take creativity and things that don't. Silly me.
Model
Wynd Mulysa
Posts: 8619
Berkeley, California, US
Dino Mangano wrote: Are there any other photographers who won't shoot nudes, or am I the only one?? I prefer to be shot nude. Though all of my clothes are dark, mostly black, any blood coming from the wound[s] can still be noticable. Not to mention the holes. I guess it depends on the location of the shot, but overall I prefer to be shot nude.
Photographer
grayagent
Posts: 546
Houston, Alaska, US
Pat Thielen wrote: I won't. Never! There's nothing more un-natural than the nude human form. It should be covered at all times and people should only have sex in the dark with a sheet between themselves. Nude photography is the gateway to other nude activities and so it should never be done under any circumstances. In fact, I think all animals should be forced to wear clothes as well. After all, if nudity is bad for humans it must be bad for other species as well. Yeah!!!!! hahaha
Photographer
Sophistocles
Posts: 21320
Seattle, Washington, US
Jessalyn wrote: more cookies arriving soon! I just made a fresh batch. And to the OP: I was nude when I made them. I like to cook nekkid. Photograph THAT. I have. I'm doing a whole book of it, in fact. https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=551356 (18+) Thank you, and good night.
Model
Jessalyn
Posts: 21433
Denver, Colorado, US
Photographer
Kelvin Hammond
Posts: 17397
Billings, Montana, US
Pat Thielen wrote: I won't. Never! There's nothing more un-natural than the nude human form. It should be covered at all times and people should only have sex in the dark with a sheet between themselves. Nude photography is the gateway to other nude activities and so it should never be done under any circumstances. In fact, I think all animals should be forced to wear clothes as well. After all, if nudity is bad for humans it must be bad for other species as well. Yeah!!!!! Nude photography is the devils playground! LOL. I wholeheartedly agree with Pat. I'm never shooting nudes again! NOT....!
Photographer
StMarc
Posts: 2959
Chicago, Illinois, US
Elise Lundquist wrote: I won't shoot. To me, and this is my opinion, it's not art. just naked people. It just tells me that the photographer (no offense) isn't creative enough to shoot diff. things. but this is just my opinion, I know many think differently than I do. good day Doesn't living under that bridge give you the rheumatiz? M
Photographer
Wye
Posts: 10811
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Elise Lundquist wrote: I won't shoot. To me, and this is my opinion, it's not art. just naked people. It just tells me that the photographer (no offense) isn't creative enough to shoot diff. things. but this is just my opinion, I know many think differently than I do. good day I'm curious at how you've arrived at this conclusion (that the photographer isn't creative enough). I'm not flaming you.. I'm just curious what's given you that conclusion. In any case.. the masters of art of the years gone by may disagree with you. It would be interesting to figure out how much of "great art" contains nudity.
Photographer
Marc Rosebeck
Posts: 2281
Albany, New York, US
Jessalyn wrote:
more cookies arriving soon! I just made a fresh batch. And to the OP: I was nude when I made them. I like to cook nekkid. Photograph THAT. scrambles for camera, oops, trip and bent a perfectly good lightstand,
Photographer
elise L photography
Posts: 521
Provo, Utah, US
Christopher Ambler wrote:
You're so right! Photographers who shoot fashion just don't have ANY creativity to present a nude. Those who insist that models wear clothing just don't get that it takes creativity to light skin and present it properly. They're just not creative enough! Oh. Wait. You meant it the other way around, didn't you? Damn. It's just SO HARD to tell the difference between things that take creativity and things that don't. Silly me. fashion?? you think naked people is fashion?? interesting. hey man i don't want to bother you and you ovbiously think differently than i do. good day
Photographer
grayagent
Posts: 546
Houston, Alaska, US
oh this is even better...i shot a nude mannequin... umm... they're not usable for sex... so was i tryin to create or was i bein perverted... answer... i made a ghastly mannequin w/ no hair attractive
Photographer
4C 41 42
Posts: 11093
Nashville, Tennessee, US
I agree with Pat. The human form is disgusting. People should all be wearing sacks which obliterate any hint of their figure. No good comes of nudity. Shame on all of you, you're products of sin! Now I'm gonna go wash my eyes out with soap.
Photographer
Wye
Posts: 10811
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jessalyn wrote:
more cookies arriving soon! I just made a fresh batch. And to the OP: I was nude when I made them. I like to cook nekkid. Photograph THAT. A word to the wise.. don't cook bacon naked.. trust me on this one.
Photographer
elise L photography
Posts: 521
Provo, Utah, US
wandering eye wrote:
I'm curious at how you've arrived at this conclusion (that the photographer isn't creative enough). I'm not flaming you.. I'm just curious what's given you that conclusion. In any case.. the masters of art of the years gone by may disagree with you. It would be interesting to figure out how much of "great art" contains nudity. They may and probably would disagree, but this is just my opinion. every artist is different. good day
Model
Jessalyn
Posts: 21433
Denver, Colorado, US
Jessalyn wrote:
this will obviously turn into a debate ... I love it when I'm right.
Photographer
Sophistocles
Posts: 21320
Seattle, Washington, US
Elise Lundquist wrote: fashion?? you think naked people is fashion?? interesting. hey man i don't want to bother you and you ovbiously think differently than i do. good day I'll sell you a clue. Half price, just for you, just today. Help me to help you - what's it going to take to get you into this clue, today?
Photographer
Eros Artist Photography
Posts: 1562
Green Cove Springs, Florida, US
grayagent wrote: u tryin to get some attention or something? :- )... who cares if you don't? seriously... Really though, you should sure to put this (EDIT: that you don't shoot nudes....) in your profile; otherwise millions of models will slam you with requests for nude work.....
Model
Jessalyn
Posts: 21433
Denver, Colorado, US
wandering eye wrote:
A word to the wise.. don't cook bacon naked.. trust me on this one. also note: don't pour soup from a pot into a bowl while naked.
Photographer
Kelvin Hammond
Posts: 17397
Billings, Montana, US
wandering eye wrote:
I'm curious at how you've arrived at this conclusion (that the photographer isn't creative enough). I'm not flaming you.. I'm just curious what's given you that conclusion. In any case.. the masters of art of the years gone by may disagree with you. It would be interesting to figure out how much of "great art" contains nudity. FYI - greek sculptors weren't all that creative either, and seemed to imagine very small penises on their superfluous dilly-dallyings in stone.
Photographer
Marc Rosebeck
Posts: 2281
Albany, New York, US
wandering eye wrote:
A word to the wise.. don't cook bacon naked.. trust me on this one. Cooking swine in the buff can be done, with proper deflection devices you may survive any cooking accident's. Take Jess, admittedly bakes the finest pastries in the nude, and shit, looks damn good, i trust you all agree
Photographer
Wye
Posts: 10811
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Elise Lundquist wrote:
They may and probably would disagree, but this is just my opinion. every artist is different. good day I'm still curious though.. what have you seen that's made you think that people who photograph nudes are less creative than those who photograph clothed people.
Photographer
4C 41 42
Posts: 11093
Nashville, Tennessee, US
wandering eye wrote: A word to the wise.. don't cook bacon naked.. trust me on this one. Jessalyn wrote: also note: don't pour soup from a pot into a bowl while naked. Never, ever sneeze while urinating. Ow. This rule may not apply to women so much, but for guys.... ow!
Photographer
Wye
Posts: 10811
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jessalyn wrote:
also note: don't pour soup from a pot into a bowl while naked. barbequeing while naked, while liberating and even refreshing, is also asking for trouble.
Model
Jessalyn
Posts: 21433
Denver, Colorado, US
LarryB wrote: Never, ever sneeze while urinating. Ow. This rule may not apply to women so much, but for guys.... ow! Don't sneeze when you're washing your face and you're covered in soap
Photographer
Marc Rosebeck
Posts: 2281
Albany, New York, US
LarryB wrote:
wandering eye wrote: A word to the wise.. don't cook bacon naked.. trust me on this one. Never, ever sneeze while urinating. Ow. This rule may not apply to women so much, but for guys.... ow! Hey, Larry, thats a fact, passed my first stone that way, bled like a gunshot victim,true story, ok back to the non-nekkedness, or was it nekked, ah shit,i'm simply here wiaitng for Leo with the cookies
Photographer
udor
Posts: 25255
New York, New York, US
Dino Mangano wrote: Are there any other photographers who won't shoot nudes, or am I the only one?? I am not saying never, but nudes don't interest as a subject to shoot. Unless maybe the right model comes along... maybe a gf... and I may change my mind... but it didn't happen yet.
Photographer
Jean-Philippe
Posts: 397
Austin, Texas, US
Christopher Ambler wrote: Damn. It's just SO HARD to tell the difference between things that take creativity and things that don't. Silly me. Yeah you are silly... LOL. I do shoot nude rarely because, I love accessories and cloths. That's what I like to shoot. Shooting nude is like talking religion. No-one believes in the same way than another - even within the same religion and temple/church. So if you shoot nude in such a category there are few chances that your approach to thinking of and shooting of nude will be the same than other. For non-believer, talking of shooting nude is off-topic. That's it. When I shoot a nude model, I shoot a body, and I shoot nudity. When I shoot a clothed model, I shoot a body and I shoot less nudity... that's it.
|