|
Forums >
General Industry >
Show me "implied nude"
OK, another linguistic question: People seem to use the term "implied nude" very loosely. To me, the logical assumption is that a model in an implied nude shot is NOT nude, but is made to appear nude. That is not, however, how people seem to use the phrase. So what does 'implied nude" mean to you? Can someone here point me to the quintessential implied nude? Dec 24 06 01:53 pm Link The model may be in fact nude but not showing the parts the would put it in a nude category. Dec 24 06 01:55 pm Link Hi! Implied nude to me would be mean naked (but, covering up private parts). Visit my port and you'll see what I mean. Merry Christmas Dec 24 06 01:56 pm Link You look nude but your not. Thats what it means to me too! Dec 24 06 01:56 pm Link this thread is worthless without pics Dec 24 06 01:58 pm Link I second that motion. Dec 24 06 01:59 pm Link This is my implied nude By Sean Abel...I don't know how to get it to load on the board though... https://img5.modelmayhem.com/061223/02/ … 59d7_m.jpg Dec 24 06 02:00 pm Link "Implied nude," to me, means that the model most likely is nude, but since the "naughty parts" (nipples, pubic region, etc.) aren't showing - because she's covering them, or some kind of props are, or the lighting hides them - it's not "really" nudity. Like so:  I was topless for this shot, but you can't see my nipples, and for all you know, I had tape or bandaids or something over them. (Which a model could do if she were especially squeamish about showing her "stuff.") Hence, the nudity is "implied." Dec 24 06 02:01 pm Link Kimberlyannqt wrote: [img]urlofimage[/image] Dec 24 06 02:01 pm Link Thanks Dec 24 06 02:03 pm Link Hmmmm, this is what I mean and what I find confusing. Both of the models in the pictures posted are nude, if you ask me. Nothing implied about it. I guess people really mean "hidden nipples" or "hidden genitals." Doesn't matter. I was just curious. Maybe the term should be "coy nudes." Dec 24 06 03:25 pm Link Colin Talcroft wrote: I had a thong on and posies (little flower sticky things that cover my nippels) Dec 24 06 03:27 pm Link But neither the little flowers or the thong are in the picture, so they aren't really there, if you know what I mean.... I keep a pocket full of posies--just in case Dec 24 06 03:29 pm Link Colin Talcroft wrote: Do you really Dec 24 06 03:35 pm Link Yes, they all fall down. Dec 24 06 03:38 pm Link  (If I did the url thing right) I would say this is implied in my opinion. I was topless and had on a thong. The photographer edited out the thong string. Dec 24 06 03:49 pm Link Nude minus the nudie bits...I've got TONS of it.     Dec 24 06 04:21 pm Link Implied nude=nude minus the WOW parts. AKA porn lite AKA drop your fucking hands already! Dec 24 06 04:26 pm Link that's right no wow parts  lolDec 24 06 04:30 pm Link Ransom J wrote: :waves fist: Dec 24 06 04:30 pm Link Implied to me means just that implied, where through the use of props etc....to hide the fact that the model is wearing clothing( not much clothing) to give the impression or imply that the model is nude when in reality the model is not. Images where the model is nude but covering or posing where one does not get a view of the private regions, in my opinion would fall under covered nude of course this is only my view... Dec 24 06 04:32 pm Link Dec 24 06 04:32 pm Link  Dec 24 06 04:33 pm Link If you're on a mac it might be too hard to see... but this was an implied nude i did....  Dec 24 06 04:34 pm Link Nemi Bea wrote: Yeah and you can go to Hhhhhh---------ave and Happy Holidays! Dec 24 06 04:37 pm Link  Dec 24 06 04:38 pm Link ... impied nude:  Dec 24 06 04:40 pm Link naomimarie wrote: One could argue that the fact that you are wearing clothing and making it appear nude would qualify that as a cover nude rather than implied. After all where is the nudity? Dec 24 06 05:54 pm Link OK, thanks everyone. I've seen enough. Now I understand. I still say all these people are nude, but I understand now how people are using the phrase: "implied nude" just means nudes with the "naughty bits" (as Monty Python used to say) covered. I guess there are five implied nudes in my portfolio as posted here, 11 nudes, and one old dude. Thanks. Personally, I like the naughty bits. Dec 24 06 05:59 pm Link Colin Talcroft wrote: My avatar would be implied though she was very much naked and didn't care if it showed. but i needed an avatar so there you are Dec 24 06 06:02 pm Link Marquita C wrote: I love this picture. The yellow flowers stand out so well with her tan skin. : 0 ) Dec 24 06 06:02 pm Link I hate when this won't upload...Crap. Dec 24 06 06:04 pm Link Cristina Ashley wrote: why would it be hard to see on a mac? Dec 27 06 02:48 am Link Yeah, I was wondering that, too, but I didn't want to start one of those Mac-PC spats. Having said that, I can't imagine why anyone would actually CHOOSE to use a PC, except to run software that doesn't run on the Mac (of which there is little). Colin Dec 27 06 03:02 am Link Colin Talcroft wrote: This is EXACTLY as I see it... Here's an example: Dec 27 06 03:08 am Link this is implied nude to me! topless but you can see anything  Dec 27 06 03:13 am Link naomimarie wrote: I agree with you. Somehow vocabulary degenrates with every generation. Dec 27 06 03:16 am Link naomimarie wrote: PERFECTLY said Dec 27 06 03:18 am Link Implied nude = the model looks nude but you can't see all the parts... doesn't matter if she actually was or not, it's the fact that the image implies that there was nudity involved in the creation of said image. Nothing hard about that! Dec 27 06 03:32 am Link Randy Tay aka Khayman wrote: Sorry.. but you guys can't be more wrong.. Dec 27 06 04:20 am Link |
