Photographer
RJ Raisch
Posts: 28
Rochester, New York, US
Jessalyn wrote:
I would say that .... 1 in 10 for me is creepy by that description. Am I working with the wrong people?? Why don't these photographers I work with put out the "I want to have sex with you" vibe? I must not be bootylicious enough. you're pretty.
Photographer
Fotticelli
Posts: 12252
Rockville, Maryland, US
Bondo Photo wrote:
I worked with a model this past weekend, and she mentioned that 9 out of 10 photographers she has worked with were "creepy", meaning that they had an underlying intention of having sex with her (I was the 1 by the way, not any of the 9). I was shocked to hear that ratio!
What does anyone else think? Maybe she's not thoroughly checking her references? Or maybe she just has the dumb luck of attracting creeps? Yeah dude, shape up! Don't be that 1 of of 10. I give creep lessons. Tell her I said "Hello baby!"
Photographer
Duncan
Posts: 2135
New York, New York, US
If you think about it, our profession is creepy, We photograph and leer at beautiful people , (mainly women) in a state of flirtyness, sexiness, and desire. Yes ,I love beautiful women and am I attracted to them of course , I am a hetero guy, to say that I wasn't I would think that the model would get insulted because that would mean she is not doing her job!
Photographer
Doug Lester
Posts: 10591
Atlanta, Georgia, US
I've said it before, many times, and I'll probably say it again, any photographer who thinks horny thoughts during a nude shoot is simply not working hard enough and should examine his (her?) real moitives for shooting nudes.
Model
Lee Frederic
Posts: 295
Chicago, Illinois, US
Michael Pandolfo wrote:
Hey that wasn't a photo shoot. It was the set of the Jodie Foster film "The Accused." And that WAS creepy lol. LOL what I meant was the photographer was like "do that! That's good!" Man I gotta be careful what I say on MM!!!
Photographer
Duncan
Posts: 2135
New York, New York, US
Doug Lester wrote:
I've said it before, many times, and I'll probably say it again, any photographer who thinks horny thoughts during a nude shoot is simply not working hard enough and should examine his (her?) real moitives for shooting nudes. It depends on your def. of horny thoughts , I appreciate the female human form and can easliy say that if it is a nice figure I am in no way "repulsed ' by it .
Photographer
Arizona Shoots
Posts: 28822
Phoenix, Arizona, US
Bondo Photo wrote:
I worked with a model this past weekend, and she mentioned that 9 out of 10 photographers she has worked with were "creepy", meaning that they had an underlying intention of having sex with her (I was the 1 by the way, not any of the 9). I was shocked to hear that ratio!
What does anyone else think? Maybe she's not thoroughly checking her references? Or maybe she just has the dumb luck of attracting creeps? Maybe she'll tell that story to the next photographer. Only this time he'll be the 1 out of 10...
Photographer
Aesthete Studios
Posts: 2088
Oakland, New Jersey, US
If the 9 (Nazgul?) were good looking they wouldn't be creepy. ;o)
Photographer
Rawhider Studios
Posts: 375
Hillsboro, Texas, US
Lestari wrote:
hah.. same here.. my booty is not bootyfull. Or whatever kids these days says it!
But it makes the job done without them trying to have sex with me If the photographer is trying to have sex with the model during the shoot, he's giving part time effort to two full time jobs.
Photographer
studio_14
Posts: 13
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
mcStudio wrote:
judging by the threads i see around MM:
best ass on MM
best breast on MM
models who sleep with photograhers
etc.
I say she is about right. More disturbingly.. All those threads seem to be started by the same person.
Photographer
James Andrew Imagery
Posts: 6713
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Bondo Photo wrote:
I worked with a model this past weekend, and she mentioned that 9 out of 10 photographers she has worked with were "creepy", meaning that they had an underlying intention of having sex with her (I was the 1 by the way, not any of the 9). I was shocked to hear that ratio!
What does anyone else think? Maybe she's not thoroughly checking her references? Or maybe she just has the dumb luck of attracting creeps? Sounds like she has a fairly low bar set for what creepy means to her. "He kept STARING at me through the viewfinder! It was SO creepy!"
Either that, or she's using reverse psychology to make up the tale to get anyone she shoots with to ensure that they 'behave and rise above that'. Could be her own overblown exaggerated way of making her thoughts known on what kind of behavior she expects.
Photographer
Collin J. Rae
Posts: 7657
Winchester, Virginia, US
God I wish I were creepier = (
Model
Alli Michelle
Posts: 1611
Miami, Florida, US
Collin J. Rae wrote:
God I wish I were creepier = ( I can't imagine foot fetish photoshoots EVER being creepy.lol sorry I had to say it.I don't find you creepy at all honestly.
Photographer
Food 4 Less
Posts: 378
Los Angeles, California, US
mcStudio wrote:
judging by the threads i see around MM:
best ass on MM
best breast on MM
models who sleep with photograhers
etc.
I say she is about right. hehe, so true
Photographer
James Barry
Posts: 681
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Maybe she was secretly disappointed that you didn't try...after all, she was 9 for 9 before you...you broke her perfect record!!!
Photographer
FKVPhotography
Posts: 30064
Ocala, Florida, US
Bondo Photo wrote:
I worked with a model this past weekend, and she mentioned that 9 out of 10 photographers she has worked with were "creepy", meaning that they had an underlying intention of having sex with her (I was the 1 by the way, not any of the 9). I was shocked to hear that ratio!
What does anyone else think? Maybe she's not thoroughly checking her references? Or maybe she just has the dumb luck of attracting creeps? Sounds like a case of "I'm so beautiful everyone just WANTS me!"
Some are just way to impressed with their own looks!
Photographer
BlackWatch
Posts: 3825
Cleveland, Ohio, US
Collin J. Rae wrote:
God I wish I were creepier = ( Just start talking to their feet and ignoring them....
Photographer
J C ModeFotografie
Posts: 14718
Los Angeles, California, US
Bondo Photo wrote:
I worked with a model this past weekend, and she mentioned that 9 out of 10 photographers she has worked with were "creepy", meaning that they had an underlying intention of having sex with her (I was the 1 by the way, not any of the 9). I was shocked to hear that ratio!
What does anyone else think? Maybe she's not thoroughly checking her references? Or maybe she just has the dumb luck of attracting creeps? If she doesn't like being looked at or having cameras pointed at her, then she shouldn't model.
JAY carreon
PHOTOGRAPHER
Model
Tiara Lestari
Posts: 11436
Jhanaydāh, Jhanaydāh, Bangladesh
Rawhider Studios wrote:
If the photographer is trying to have sex with the model during the shoot, he's giving part time effort to two full time jobs. Hahhaha.. so its a full time job huh!!
I tought it takes less effort
Photographer
ChanStudio
Posts: 9219
Alpharetta, Georgia, US
Maybe she (the model) is the creepy one.
Photographer
Scott Harrill
Posts: 305
Forest City, North Carolina, US
Aesthete Studios wrote:
If the 9 (Nazgul?) were good looking they wouldn't be creepy. ;o) Bingo! I think she means creepy=old and uninteresting (to her).
Photographer
Mortonovich
Posts: 6209
San Diego, California, US
Maybe the model would think the same thing of museum visitors as they study at a painting.
Maybe the model confuses the photographers observation of the subject matter as something else.
Model
Kimberlyannqt
Posts: 148
Branson, Missouri, US
Isn't everyone a little creepy, just get some good pictures and move on..
|