WoWimages wrote:
No thanks, unreasonable terms if I am paying.

I can see where you're coming from and I agree.
While many of the terms are understandable in some cases, only a few are valid terms in practically all cases.

There's one term that's used which almost always baffles me:
"The reselling of shots is prohibited unless previously discussed & payment arrangement determined (25% of profit or a once off amount)."

First, the minor point on that statement.  It doesn't specify which payment will be accepted... the lower amount of the higher of the two options.

The more severe point is "25% of profit ". 
What constitutes profit???
While there may be some difference in accounting methods and laws in Australia and the USA, for the most part I'm guessing they're the same.

Pretend I take a photo which I paid a model $100 to pose for and sold it for $10,000.
Under the conditions that the model required I can EASILY show that I didn't make any profit, and maybe even lost money doing the shoot therefore I don't owe anything more than the original fee (if any).

I could claim expenses on studio mortgage / rent.  Props and wardrobe that needed to be purchased, utility bills, travel and transportation expenses, equipment costs and/or depreciation.... and so on and so on... making it appear that I spent more than $10grand for the shoot leaving me with NO PROFIT!

When you enter the term 'profit' into a contract you literrally have to describe what constitues 'profit'.  At a minimum that would require a paragraph or two to define, but more realistically would take a page or more.

For that reason I'd seriously re-think the terms.

Other than the points I've made I hope Bille becomes a success.