Shadow Dancer wrote:
Should somebody take a photo of it before it disappears?

Is "Fine Art" thinner than regular art, like paint brush bristles?

I saw a 16x20 Fine Art print of an 11x14 regular art print so I made a Polaroid of it and I want $666,000 for it. Now.

it doesn't disappear, as long as you use proper archival processing

fine art is a minimum of 800 grit. fine Arthur, is also an acceptable answer

I'll take ten copies of the Polaroid, sell them on eBay, they won't go for much,
but I hope to make it up on quantity

Motordrive Photography wrote:

it doesn't disappear, as long as you use proper archival processing

fine art is a minimum of 800 grit. fine Arthur, is also an acceptable answer

I'll take ten copies of the Polaroid, sell them on eBay, they won't go for much,
but I hope to make it up on quantity

First, somebody gotta take a photo of it (the Art). That is, if they can find any that isn't dead. Once it starts smelling funny the game is over.

After I took a Polaroid of that other thingie, I set it on fire. So, I just got the one.

800 grit is some fine Art. They fined Arthur but he's broke so doing jail time instead. Cost us instead of making money.

Shadow Dancer wrote:
800 grit is some fine Art. They fined Arthur but he's broke so doing jail time instead. Cost us instead of making money.

sometimes we all suffer for our art (Arthur)

Motordrive Photography wrote:

sometimes we all suffer for our art (Arthur)

Feller just ain't right in the head is what.

I'mma create Finer Art, like the Finer Things In Life. More Gooder, that's what they mean but fancier.

Paolo D Photography wrote:
the finest art is only microns across, you'd need a microscope to see it.

I might have created one of the great museums this morning then...