|
In terms of model photography (and videography), What is it? How would you define it? express it? display it? Shoot it?
Is it necessarily sexual? graphic? erotic? pornographic? and if so, how does your individual definition of these terms impact on how you would present sensuality in a shoot? Just a little conversation starter for tonight's parties.and tomorrow's regrets. Happy New Year!!! Dec 31 18 12:32 pm Link This is hard to define. When a model has this look you know it.
I know a model who has a sensual and erotic look both when she is clothed or unclothed. Dec 31 18 12:44 pm Link Sensual means "of the senses," something that stimulates our senses. It is used to describe things that give us highly rewarding physical experiences. Looking at a beautiful painting is sensual, as is eating a type of food you enjoy. Hearing your favorite song on the radio is also sensual. None of these things are sexual, but they all bring pleasurable sensory experiences.
To me, sensuality in a photograph relates to deep and vivid colors, or pleasing textures in a black and white. There can be erotic elements to the subject matter, but unless the visual aspects appeal somehow to my senses, it is not a sensual viewing experience. Dec 31 18 01:12 pm Link Al_Vee Photography wrote: I mostly agree but I had to add one word to one of your sentences just because.
Dec 31 18 02:54 pm Link Al_Vee Photography wrote: Hey Al,
Dec 31 18 05:53 pm Link Rays Fine Art wrote: As a party conversation, it might be a good time to go into another room. No one who reads the Song with care can question the artistry of the poet. The subtle delicacy with which he evokes intense sensuous awareness while avoiding crude titillation is one of the chief marks of his achievement. This he accomplishes largely by indirection, by analogy and by bringing to the foreground the sensuous in the world of nature (or in food, drink, cosmetics and jewelry). To liken a lover's enjoyment of his beloved to a gazelle "browsing among lilies" (2:16), or her breasts to "twin fawns of a gazelle that browse among the lilies" (4:5), or the beloved herself to a garden filled with choice fruits inviting the lover to feast (4:12-16) -- these combine exquisite artistry and fine sensitivity. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?s … ersion=NIV
Under the apple tree I roused you;
******************
from a different thread wrote: My take away on the above quote would mean that nude images of men, regardless of their depiction or activity, would not be erotic because, I and many men, would not find images of nude men to be sexually stimulating, and would not “use” it, and therefore, any sex act involving men could not be porn by this logic, unless one was stimulated by men. Or if "men will use it", as per the quote, were defined by one individual, or two, somewhere in the world, which could then render images of cuts of meat and animals such as clams and ousters, and plant life such as orchids, anthurium, and many other flowers and plants (including nuts, fruits and fungi), which, at some point in their development, resemble a portion of human genitalia, and therefore, must be porn because someone somewhere might "use" it.
dictionary wrote: Sorry: I do not see any validity in making up one's own definition to fit the argument. Jan 03 19 02:21 pm Link It's very simple - look at my photos and you will understand ![]() Jan 11 19 03:52 pm Link |