Forums >
Digital Art and Retouching >
Why not try this "alternative" to friend requests?
Been going through these threads and the one on Retouchers randomly sending friend requests piqued my interest. I did my own retouching for years and never could match the caliber of those who do it professionally. So I recently began hiring retouchers, and received mixed results. Some blew me away, others disappointed. Some disregarded all requests and completely missed the mark. I still want to hire retouchers, but as a "noob" to that game I find it to be a gamble, with my money and time on the line. Retouchers usually need specifics, and I seem to have trouble communicating them. So, instead of the random friend request as a way to advertise and network, why not send a message, or a TAG even? I look at my port knowing some images would benefit from better retouching, yet I don't know what exactly what. Why not PM a photog and say "Hey, love your work, and I'd like to know if you are in need of retouch services? I see some images I feel I could enhance and really bring out!" And then, if responded to, outline some specifics that you could do, and why you feel it necessary, and maybe a price quote. Nov 28 17 03:07 pm Link Square Jaw Photography wrote: They already say that in tags. One rather common and hilarious tag is: Your portfolio is so wonderful that I want to comment on every image. Now the limit on PMs has reduced PMs thus driving traffic to tags. Square Jaw Photography wrote: One fellow wrote that to me. I said: OK. The results were bizarre and cartoonish. Nov 28 17 05:09 pm Link Square Jaw Photography wrote: You do or don't like their caliber? What do you like about them? But now you want to hire them??? Learn to do it yourself! Square Jaw Photography wrote: You pay your money and you take your chances. Square Jaw Photography wrote: Hire them only. Square Jaw Photography wrote: You've been here too long to be a noob. Take lessons & study. Then you won't have communication problems. Nov 28 17 05:21 pm Link Mark Salo wrote: This is a hypothetical introduction of an example PM. There was no need to isolate and comment on it. Mark Salo wrote: I feel your pain there, but as someone new to hiring retouchers, it at least provides me a frame of reference on the skills of others and how they can help/hurt my imagery Mark Salo wrote: I do like their caliber, as the statement implies my efforts towards matching them, but unable to do so. So of course I want to hire them. And if I have been retouching for years (which includes multiple online courses, several tutorials, and countless hours of practical application) and still cannot match their caliber, then hiring instead of self retouching makes more sense if I have a more difficult project. Mark Salo wrote: That is a given. Which is why I posted this forum. I am suggesting a way to communicate with retouchers more effectively, so fewer "chances" are taken. Mark Salo wrote: This statement implies that I am being too lazy and haven't been doing exactly as you suggest. Let's paint a clearer picture; I am an active duty US Marine cameraman and currently have no access to formal training in model retouching. I use Lynda.com for basic courses, YouTube, Vimeo, anything I can get my hands on to hone my retouching. But the professional retouchers seem to have a certain "je ne sais quoi" that I am unable to figure out.Their skin blending is cleaner, their colors bolder and balanced, and they seem to know what do with an image the moment they see it I tend to edit and retouch for hours per image and cannot match what they can produce. Nov 28 17 08:27 pm Link Square Jaw Photography wrote: It really all depends on what you want, your goals and vision, treat finding a retoucher like any personal service in your life, you need to find a good fit so most likely someone who retouches images like yours, (e.g. a beauty photographer will look for a beauty retoucher) so define your work style and look for a retoucher who does that type of retouching because they will have more practice and understanding in that area most likely. I still want to hire retouchers, but as a "noob" to that game I find it to be a gamble, with my money and time on the line. Retouchers usually need specifics, and I seem to have trouble communicating them. When you find a few retouchers you like, message them and ask them if they would be interested in doing a test image that could lead to reoccurring paid work - send them all the same image and when/if they send back the image, weigh up how they did each, in terms of speed, quality and approachability. So, instead of the random friend request as a way to advertise and network, why not send a message, or a TAG even? I look at my port knowing some images would benefit from better retouching, yet I don't know what exactly what. Why not PM a photog and say "Hey, love your work, and I'd like to know if you are in need of retouch services? I see some images I feel I could enhance and really bring out!" And then, if responded to, outline some specifics that you could do, and why you feel it necessary, and maybe a price quote. I have to say your ideal is not going to happen, I'm sorry to say, people on MM send copy+paste messages, tags etc. to everyone, they tend to not even look through a portfolio - and also most great, professional retouchers are not on Model Mayhem so I think you need to look outside of this box for advice Nov 29 17 05:05 pm Link Well, when you do find a retoucher you like, ask them to do a test retouch (most of the time a test retouch is free or at least not priced like a regular retouch, or it could be priced exactly like a regular retouch, it really depends on the person). I feel most people would accept this and that's usually how I open to people lol. Also, not sure if you do this now, but I would have some type of set guidelines on what you want to be done to the photo because if you leave it too vague then you would get something different than what you expected. Oh, and the tags on MM that seem to be mostly from retouchers are made with bots (a program that automates whatever you tell it to do, ex-to send tags), so they essentially make one message and it's sent to whoever it's directed to, in this case, some retouchers tagging a lot of photographers with the same message. So using tags to help influence you, might not be the best idea imo. Nov 29 17 05:29 pm Link Test images sent out sound like a great idea, and I have considered it in the past, but how many retouchers would spend time on an image for a potential rejection? Or is it more commonplace than I realize? As retouchers, what kind of specifics do you look for when a client sends in a request? Nov 29 17 07:36 pm Link Another thing you could try is post here https://www.modelmayhem.com/forums/thread/76 Just provide a link to a few raw's you have left over and see what happens. usually you get all kind of different retouches on different skill levels as this forum is mostly for practise. but there are a lot of really good retouchers there. and if you like someones retouch you can easily get in touch with them. another thing is, if they do retouch your shots they actually like them ![]() Nov 30 17 02:08 am Link Square Jaw Photography wrote: The first half of that question just depends on the person, but as long as the request is clear and easy to follow and not vague and open-ended you should be good to go. Nov 30 17 04:04 pm Link I hate the expectation of a "test retouch", it's so presumptory, I don't ask starbucks for a test coffee in case I prefer some other chains products. Pay the price for an image and if you don't like it dont pay for another. Dec 02 17 02:50 pm Link JerichoFoxx wrote: Nice! Thanks! This is exactly what I was looking for. I love some of the work on these threads! Dec 03 17 11:22 pm Link Mike Needham Retouching wrote: I can understand that, as it is akin to asking a photographer, "Can I please have the RAWs?" Yet I guess it just depends on the personal preference of a person and what offends them. I am already collaborating with PKJ Retouching because of his suggestion for "test retouches". Dec 03 17 11:32 pm Link Mike Needham Retouching wrote: True, but testing is about building trust and also trying new things, of course you can do a paid test, but it depends on the terms and conditions, but I find retouching one free image as a test will show them that you trust your photographer/client and if you show them you can produce good work even on a test thats cost free, they will most likely come back and work with you again Dec 04 17 12:23 pm Link Mike also if you don't agree with my opinion then it's best you keep it here than on my page, just so everyone else can see it and forum their own views too ![]() Dec 05 17 03:35 pm Link Mark Salo wrote: Cheap and quality do not match, indeed there are people who request huge rates but before and after examples should help you judge and choose. Dec 06 17 10:25 pm Link Square Jaw Photography wrote: Learn about color. Start here and follow hundreds of links leading to other hundreds of links: Retouchers usually need specifics, and I seem to have trouble communicating them. I think you communicate your needs quite well. If someone needs specifics this may be for various reasons and those can be clarified in a few sentences. Joe Diamond wrote: Expensive and quality do not match either. In most cases quality has nothing to do with price. Free test should be a low size watermark version, personally i dont have time to build trust on my time and old clients`. If you are new in business then yes you should do a lot of free work till you get a decent portfolio. What's the point in doing watermarked tests? This doesn't build trust, on the contrary - it says "I put a watermark because I don't trust you". Plus - how can the other possibly evaluate the quality if he cannot inspect it in original size? Dec 08 17 06:40 am Link Dec 08 17 09:14 am Link Mike Needham Retouching wrote: The Starbucks near me will make a free second coffee, or issue a refund, in cases where a customer isn't happy. Dec 08 17 09:01 pm Link Square Jaw Photography wrote: One thing that VIP members forget is that you can't write to anyone outside your friends list. So you got to add them first. Dec 09 17 01:46 am Link AG_Boston wrote: That is different from free testing as it is done in the challenges forum and in other cases - just throwing a few images and waiting for magic to happen. Dec 09 17 04:50 am Link |