Trevor Howell wrote:
So a week has passed since I messaged an MM moderator about a model who copied at least 2 photos from another model's portfolio (one of them was my work), Photoshopped her face over the original model's face, and posted them in her portfolio as her own. I've heard no response to my concern about this in the past week. The offending "model" has since removed the images from her port (not before I saved screen-captures) and deleted a tag from the original model who commented on the copyright violation.

Should I forget about this?

Oh, man....that is atrocious, I cant even beleive someone would have the audacity to do something like that. I say since she took them down you should forget about it for now, it sucks, but at least they're down, which is the ultimate goal, right?

Amanda Padilla wrote:
how good was the photo shop! ?

My question exactly...

Amanda Padilla wrote:
how good was the photo shop! ?

That's what I was thinking! lol

Amanda Padilla wrote:
how good was the photo shop! ?

Inquiring minds are still waiting for an answer....

Amanda Padilla wrote:
how good was the photo shop! ?

Guys, being able to photoshop a person's face from a different pic and merge it seamlessly onto another person's body is not only difficult, but the two images must have the same ANGLE, lens focal length, Film speed (or like setting in digital), resolution, Color temperature and ..... Light source. 

Thus anyone who can do that is a Photoshop God/Goddess.  If it was a great fake and I'm very interested in seeing it

But then most times it can't be done, because the source material is not matching.  The only times I've seen it done well is a very FEW Of those faked celebrity nudes where the original images were both on camera flash paparazzo style snaps.

F.Y. Hamada wrote:

Guys, being able to photoshop a person's face from a different pic and merge it seamlessly onto another person's body is not only difficult, but the two images must have the same ANGLE, lens focal length, Film speed (or like setting in digital), resolution, Color temperature and ..... Light source. 

Thus anyone who can do that is a Photoshop God/Goddess.  If it was a great fake and I'm very interested in seeing it

But then most times it can't be done, because the source material is not matching.  The only times I've seen it done well is a very FEW Of those faked celebrity nudes where the original images were both on camera flash paparazzo style snaps.

Agreed.  I'd have to see these with my own eyes.  I'd like OP to upload the screen captures and his originals.