Joe Diamond wrote:
If a photographer is talented and know a bit of CGI  its easy, He is a very good photographer firs of all

I am pretty sure there is no CGI there. Just mashing up of god knows how many photos.

A lot of my stuff get's to be 100-150 layers. 200 is impressive! Love his work.

AbbeyMarie wrote:

I am pretty sure there is no CGI there. Just mashing up of god knows how many photos.

A lot of my stuff get's to be 100-150 layers. 200 is impressive! Love his work.

You sure? My first thought was CGI.

madsneset wrote:
You sure? My first thought was CGI.

Almost positive. I know in at least one of his series there was no CGI, as he said so. So I assume it's the same with all his milk series. But there is also the fact that as a photo manipulator I can 100% say this is possible without CGI.

You just poor milk over a girl over and over again, then shape and mash the photos together. What he does is not impressive, it's how well he does it, and how much time he puts into doing it that makes it outstanding.

His technique, and execution is  flawless.

People highly underestimate the power of photo manipulation, and and are too quick to jump to CGI as their conclusion.

Mr_Sable wrote:
I'd call this good evidence against CGI.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7509/159 … 8b40_o.jpg

also the big tubs and plastic he places on the studio floor in front of the model are a good indication.

I'd love to see a shot of the liquid in air though.

Here's another behind the scenes shot from his Flickr page:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/jaroslav/8270764051/

Exactly.

You don't need CGI. Just a crew of 7 and a studio that doesn't mind you trashing it.

That's all.

NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote:

Exactly.

You don't need CGI. Just a crew of 7 and a studio that doesn't mind you trashing it.

That's all.

You forgot to mention an excellent retoucher.

Eyesso wrote:
Impressive....but dear God, who has the patience for all that editing and combining 200 layers in Photoshop?

ummmm, someone that wants to produce impressive work?

Ashish Arora wrote:
You forgot to mention an excellent retoucher.

You need that regardless of whether CGI is used or not.

NothingIsRealButTheGirl wrote:
Exactly.

You don''t need CGI. Just a crew of 7 and a studio that doesn''t mind you trashing it.

That''s all.

You forgot "a great concept."

Mr_Sable wrote:
I'd call this good evidence against CGI.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7509/159 … 8b40_o.jpg

also the big tubs and plastic he places on the studio floor in front of the model are a good indication.

I'd love to see a shot of the liquid in air though.

Here's another behind the scenes shot from his Flickr page:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/jaroslav/8270764051/

Watch his videos on his website

http://aurumlight.com/

FFantastique wrote:
OP?

He's MIA. If you're really interested you might track him down through one of the following...

http://www.digitalartform.com/

https://twitter.com/digitalArtform

https://thewaysofscience.com/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/josephfrancis1

https://www.facebook.com/people/Joseph- … 6015228880

https://vimeo.com/user1680426

Joseph Francis
VFX Supervisor
Los Angeles, CA