|
Forums >
General Industry >
Copying pix
There was a thread about this somewhere, but I can't find it. Anyway, here's two links...   Look somewhat similar to me, to say the least. Nov 14 06 06:32 pm Link Too simple. Nude model + pose. Kinda hard not to overlap that. Not a lot of creative complexity in the first place. Nov 14 06 06:39 pm Link I'm the model in the first pic, taken last year. The second shot was uploaded recently to someone else's portfolio. Same pose, same lighting, hair position, eyes closed...exact.  Nov 14 06 06:41 pm Link On the plus side though Katy the copy isn't even a good one. The model is clearly not to your standards! D. Nov 14 06 07:00 pm Link I actually thought hers was better. Nov 14 06 07:02 pm Link Absolutely not! D. Nov 14 06 07:03 pm Link Last I heard, he was planning on doing a book. Wonder if that'll be featured in it? Nov 14 06 07:06 pm Link Copying pix is bad bad bad bad bad!!!! Its almost impossible to not copy something that has been done before but i try really hard never to use an idea ive seen.... or try to mimic anyones style... which is really f-in hard doing fetish/bondage stuff! Nov 14 06 07:08 pm Link katy_T wrote: def not, the ballet on the feet is a great touch Nov 14 06 07:09 pm Link personally i like the top one ... toes are more pointed, back higher off the ground, shin is at a nicer (more 90 degree angle), wrists are angled .... just overall looks like better. Nov 14 06 07:26 pm Link Yeah, the camera height is better on the first one. As is the pose. Nov 14 06 07:28 pm Link Yeah....looks similiar. Are you the guy who created the girl sitting on a chair backwards resting her chin on her arms crossed over the back, or the girl hugging the tree at the park, or the girl looking over the top of her sunglasses. ooooh, or the crop from belly button to knees with the painties about half off.... I've shot that same shot (years ago) and hand't seen either of these. Mark Nov 14 06 08:06 pm Link katy_T wrote: I highly doubt it. Her posture is weak and her back isnt as diagonal as yours. They are exact but different in many ways. Nov 18 06 07:43 pm Link katy_T wrote: urs is def. better. Your body is raised higher and theres more power coming from ur abdomen than the other model, well in my opinion at least Nov 18 06 08:00 pm Link There's a guy I know (I don't like to give him the title of "photographer") who does that. Sees a photo he likes and copies it identically - from the pose, to the setting, everything, just a different model. Someone here said it best in another thread, so I'll just quote him... E|||B wrote: Yeah, sure... everything's been done, but... Nov 18 06 08:57 pm Link The irony is that photographer B knows model A and regularly slates her work... Nov 19 06 06:13 am Link I like both shots...The first one...Hmmm..I dont like the way the angle of the neck flows off the body...Neck looks almost broken...Great shot though..love the toes and the power in the shot. More partial to the over all lines in the second..feels more natural. I thibnk both shots offer something..and I have seen this type shot many times before I saw this post. Werd up... Nov 19 06 06:34 am Link Nude photos are not permitted in the forums. Please link to the images. Nov 19 06 06:44 am Link I waay prefer Katy's!! Nov 19 06 09:48 am Link |
