Forums >
General Industry >
18+ AVIs
Knowing and supporting the reasons why MM does not allow 18+ AVIs, what would be your AVI if given the chance? Reminder: only the Link and not the Pic in the Form!! Trying not to get this one shut down. Mine: https://img4.modelmayhem.com/061008/12/ … f68ef5.jpg later, Nov 06 06 07:04 pm Link I'm happy with my current one I guess. Nov 06 06 07:08 pm Link ...I would have revolving avatar photos: ALL 18+ https://img4.modelmayhem.com/060917/12/ … 3881_m.jpg https://img4.modelmayhem.com/061013/10/ … 5423_m.jpg https://img4.modelmayhem.com/060901/21/ … 0250_m.jpg https://img4.modelmayhem.com/060605/07/ … 5725_m.jpg https://img4.modelmayhem.com/060430/12/ … 26831d.jpg https://img4.modelmayhem.com/060605/07/ … 5725_m.jpg https://img4.modelmayhem.com/060625/18/ … f59cee.jpg ...a collection of Nudes -and, could be in most European avatars presented as artistic nudes. Nov 06 06 07:17 pm Link There are so many classy 18+ pics. Nov 06 06 07:17 pm Link dgold wrote: Revolving AVI's would be cool no matter what rating! Nov 06 06 07:19 pm Link Attollo-Validus wrote: Very cool that you considered the disclaimer for the 18+ avatars! Nov 06 06 07:22 pm Link UdoR wrote: Too Funny! I know that you have a few Artistic Shots! Nov 06 06 07:28 pm Link Attollo-Validus wrote: Love this pose, shot and model, Attollo. Nov 06 06 07:30 pm Link Attollo-Validus wrote: UdoR...aw, I think a butt shot would suit you. Nov 06 06 07:33 pm Link UdoR wrote: Nov 06 06 07:33 pm Link Nov 06 06 07:39 pm Link If in a nude photo the nipples are covered by the model's hair, would it be allowed as an avatar? Nov 06 06 07:39 pm Link TSOJAW, That Pic would get some attention, Great Shot! Thanks for the Comment Dgold Nov 06 06 07:42 pm Link Rossi Photography wrote: Hmm, is there a Moderator in the House? Lol Nov 06 06 07:44 pm Link Attollo-Validus wrote: Love your new choise of AVI. Very powerful. Here's mine.. Nov 06 06 07:44 pm Link Attollo-Validus wrote: Well thank you. But if you could steal another persons images for an avi, I'd make this one of the first major thefts. https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=1446927 Nov 06 06 07:49 pm Link Mike Walker wrote: Yes. Great selection Mike. Nov 06 06 07:49 pm Link Mike Walker wrote: I love that image, Mike. I think mine would be... Nov 07 06 06:42 am Link Nov 07 06 06:45 am Link Attollo-Validus wrote: That pic is HOT - However, the one you have currently is superior. Nov 07 06 07:06 am Link Nov 07 06 07:08 am Link 00siris wrote: I like that. But wouldnt it still be allowed as an avi now? Nov 07 06 07:09 am Link Lora wrote: Hey, I've seen your work - I'm a fan - BIG fan Nov 07 06 07:15 am Link Thank you! Nov 07 06 07:17 am Link Nov 07 06 07:19 am Link https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=1610169 September 03, 2006 Douglas Peterlin (Illinois) https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=1580093 August 12, 2006 Scott Wilson (Illinois) Attollo-Validus wrote: Nov 07 06 07:19 am Link Rossi Photography wrote: I don't know, but I had this up yesterday and one of the mods flagged it as 18+ and there are no nipples showing Nov 07 06 07:20 am Link David Birdsong wrote: There seems to almost be a hint of nipple showing. Maybe that's the reason? Otherwise I really couldn't tell you - I really do like that shot! Nov 07 06 07:23 am Link Rossi Photography wrote: What if you photoshop some nipples from a guy over top of the female's nipples? Since male nipples aren't nasty and icky then it'd be OK, right? Nov 07 06 07:25 am Link David Birdsong wrote: It's considered naughty based on the ratio of the aureola to the size of the nipple, divided by the nipple depth and cup size times a constant, measured at a chord tangential to the aureola. That value gives the distance along the chord of naughtiness and if you expose areas of the boob within the radius of naughtiness it's 18+ otherwise it is not. That's why hand-bra shots are generally OK, because they break the ratio up into a complex function and it's too hard to calculate accurately. Nov 07 06 07:28 am Link Marcus J. Ranum wrote: rotflmao - you have a point. Nov 07 06 07:28 am Link Marcus J. Ranum wrote: ahhh, but his pic had nothing to do with the tangential aureola - he miss the seacant rule Nov 07 06 07:30 am Link Oh, Marcus. When we have a protest and demand to see the whole female boob without discrimination, I know you'll lead us all. Nov 07 06 07:33 am Link Lora wrote: Lead? Naaah, but I'll come do photographs of the march on capitol hill, when the b(o)(o)bie liberation army, 100,000 strong, make their move! Nov 07 06 07:38 am Link Marcus J. Ranum wrote: I saw U say "b(0)(o)bies" and that got my attenshin!!! Is this 4 real? When is the march gonna happen? Lora R U gonna be there? I would totally go and take pictures! That'd be SLAMMIN! Nov 07 06 07:39 am Link I would be interested to know what they think of that. Who can argue with it? Nov 07 06 07:41 am Link GWC wrote: I actually got "picked on" yesterday for having small boobies by a girl with huge implants who claimed they were really real. I wish you were there to defend me! Although she did manage to look like an idiot all by her own doing. Nov 07 06 07:42 am Link David Birdsong wrote: Mine's a bit similar, only her hair falls over her breasts covering the nipples. I've seen others that show more used as avatars, though. I dunno'... I'll stay on the safe side and just stick with the one I'm using, I guess. Lol... Nov 07 06 09:03 am Link Lora wrote: Actually the nipple isn't even close to showing in that pic... I know, I cropped it a lot... Nov 07 06 09:15 am Link Marcus J. Ranum wrote: Okay now I am really confused... Nov 07 06 09:36 am Link |