Photographer
Brian Diaz
Posts: 65617
Danbury, Connecticut, US
Photographer
Tog
Posts: 55204
Birmingham, Alabama, US
People who live in glass houses should not *bump* for Brian.
EDIT:
Jesus.. You made me bump for plastic sex? Bleh!
Photographer
Stacy Leigh
Posts: 3064
New York, New York, US
Paramour Productions- I am pround to be in the same sentance as you, let alone the same genre (am I spelling genre correctly??) Is there a place for this type of photography? (and don't anybody answer with a pot-shot. I scare off easily)
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
People who live in glass houses should not *bump* for Brian.
EDIT:
Jesus.. You made me bump for plastic sex? Bleh! You're LOVING every minute of this aren't you Bill?
Photographer
Stacy Leigh
Posts: 3064
New York, New York, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
People who live in glass houses should not *bump* for Brian.
EDIT:
Jesus.. You made me bump for plastic sex? Bleh! Hey now!!! they're pretty, and I like to dress them up and photograph them.
Photographer
Stacy Leigh
Posts: 3064
New York, New York, US
Thanks Brian  It's nice to know I can give a guy a woodie with my pics. So I am a glamour photographer after all...
Photographer
Giacomo Cirrincioni
Posts: 22234
Stamford, Connecticut, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
Has this turned into everyone against Ransom J?
You kids better not make me turn this thread around! Not at all I dig Ransom! But I don't think I'm getting across what I'm trying to say, which makes perfect sense because the thoughts are not really clear in my mind yet - so I suppose I can't really express them well yet...
Model
scarletdiva
Posts: 551
Los Angeles, California, US
Ransom J wrote:
Nah, aside from a couple of pissy models mad that SI makes the swimsuit editions to turn on middle aged men and pre teens, we've been getting along just dandy. If this thread is still going: I agree with you as well, J, (assuming i'm not the one to whom you were referring), but i think it's just a matter of semantics as well... is it basically just jerk-off material? Yeah... Would I call it porn? Not necessarily, just because of porn's negative connotations and societal stigma, and because society, in general, defines porn as something else... but otherwise, hell yeah.
Photographer
Giacomo Cirrincioni
Posts: 22234
Stamford, Connecticut, US
Stacy Leigh wrote:
Paramour Productions- I am pround to be in the same sentance as you, let alone the same genre (am I spelling genre correctly??) Is there a place for this type of photography? (and don't anybody answer with a pot-shot. I scare off easily) I believe there is otherwise I wouldn't be spending my time on it. We'll talk more next week over a Rare Burger, but yeah I think so...
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Paramour Productions wrote:
Not at all I dig Ransom! But I don't think I'm getting across what I'm trying to say, which makes perfect sense because the thoughts are not really clear in my mind yet - so I suppose I can't really express them well yet... No, no I understand you completely. i just don't agree with some of your points. And that's okay. Because I'm smart enough, I'm good enough, and dammit, people like me. Or at least my glamour pics.
Model
scarletdiva
Posts: 551
Los Angeles, California, US
And Stacy I like your photos; you should talk to "f16photo" he's been wondering what said-glamour shots would look like shot by a woman...
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
MadamePsychosis wrote:
If this thread is still going: I agree with you as well, J, (assuming i'm not the one to whom you were referring), but i think it's just a matter of semantics as well... is it basically just jerk-off material? Yeah... Would I call it porn? Not necessarily, just because of porn's negative connotations and societal stigma, and because society, in general, defines porn as something else... but otherwise, hell yeah. A rose by any other name...
And no my dear, you aren't one of the models.
Model
scarletdiva
Posts: 551
Los Angeles, California, US
Dayumn this thread's got STAYING-POWER.
Photographer
Tog
Posts: 55204
Birmingham, Alabama, US
Ransom J wrote:
You're LOVING every minute of this aren't you Bill? Lil' bit... Lil' bit..
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
W.G. Rowland wrote:
Lil' bit... Lil' bit.. You owe me a beer.
Photographer
Giacomo Cirrincioni
Posts: 22234
Stamford, Connecticut, US
MadamePsychosis wrote:
If this thread is still going: I agree with you as well, J, (assuming i'm not the one to whom you were referring), but i think it's just a matter of semantics as well... is it basically just jerk-off material? Yeah... Would I call it porn? Not necessarily, just because of porn's negative connotations and societal stigma, and because society, in general, defines porn as something else... but otherwise, hell yeah. Not to sound crass, but since this point keeps coming up....
I don't jerk off to glamour. None of it. I look at it, and can stare at beautiful images of beautiful women for hours on end. I may even fantasize about it. But I never jerk off to it.
I do jerk off to porn, quite frequently these days, actually....
I like both, but I prefer to shoot glamour.
So I guess, I see a difference between the two, because they serve a different purpose for me as an end user?????
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
MadamePsychosis wrote:
Dayumn this thread's got STAYING-POWER. I'm being made out like I'm the revolutionary voice of Glamour, glammer and gla'mour' photographers every where underwraps though lol. If you had ANY idea the number of messages I'm been getting in AMEN's and KUDOS, and FIGHT THE POWERS. LOL. It's hilarious. I had no idea that there were THAT many glamour shooters fed up with the holier than thou posturing of the fashion and arty types on here.
Model
scarletdiva
Posts: 551
Los Angeles, California, US
Paramour Productions wrote:
Ok see, I don't jerk off to glamour. None of it. I look at it, and can stare at beautiful images of beautiful women for hours on end. I may even fantasize about it. But I never jerk off to it.
I do jerk off to porn, quite frequently these days, actually....
I like both, but I prefer to shoot glamour.
So I guess, I see a difference between the two, because they serve a different purpose for me as an end user????? yeah, i agree with you too. the point of both is to AROUSE.. and most people have no imagination and want to jerk off to what arouses them. ;-) i like to just dream myself.
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Paramour Productions wrote:
Not to sound crass, but since this point keeps coming up....
I don't jerk off to glamour. None of it. I look at it, and can stare at beautiful images of beautiful women for hours on end. I may even fantasize about it. But I never jerk off to it.
I do jerk off to porn, quite frequently these days, actually....
I like both, but I prefer to shoot glamour.
So I guess, I see a difference between the two, because they serve a different purpose for me as an end user????? Well i don't think anyone was accusing you of jerking off to glamour. I don't jerk off to it either. I also don't go to the strip club (I'm cheap).
But glamour is wank material for most of who VIEW it, not create it. That's the point.
Model
scarletdiva
Posts: 551
Los Angeles, California, US
Ransom J wrote:
I'm being made out like I'm the revolutionary voice of Glamour, glammer and gla'mour' photographers every where underwraps though lol. If you had ANY idea the number of messages I'm been getting in AMEN's and KUDOS, and FIGHT THE POWERS. LOL. It's hilarious. I had no idea that there were THAT many glamour shooters fed up with the holier than thou posturing of the fashion and arty types on here. You are a warrier: How do you feel about crucifixion???
Model
MelissaLynnette LaDiva
Posts: 50816
Leawood, Kansas, US
MadamePsychosis wrote:
Dayumn this thread's got STAYING-POWER. I slipped it some Viagra.
Model
scarletdiva
Posts: 551
Los Angeles, California, US
Ransom J wrote:
Well i don't think anyone was accusing you of jerking off to glamour. I don't jerk off to it either. I also don't go to the strip club (I'm cheap).
But glamour is wank material for most of who VIEW it, not create it. That's the point. Great minds...
Model
scarletdiva
Posts: 551
Los Angeles, California, US
Melissa Lynnette wrote:
I slipped it some Viagra. Uh-oh... it's getting on its years... isn't Viagra dangerous for men over 60? or threads over 380?
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
MadamePsychosis wrote:
You are a warrier: How do you feel about crucifixion??? In small doses and black latex it's pretty fun.
Photographer
Giacomo Cirrincioni
Posts: 22234
Stamford, Connecticut, US
Ransom J wrote:
Well i don't think anyone was accusing you of jerking off to glamour. I don't jerk off to it either. I also don't go to the strip club (I'm cheap).
But glamour is wank material for most of who VIEW it, not create it. That's the point. LOL, I just came from a strip club... Going to be shooting a new Hungarian girl, wait till you see her...
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Paramour Productions wrote:
LOL, I just came from a strip club... Going to be shooting a new Hungarian girl, wait till you see her... I just can't do it. I was born and raised in Vegas. You'd think gambling and strip clubs would be in my blood. But i sooooooo have better things to do with my money.
Photographer
Giacomo Cirrincioni
Posts: 22234
Stamford, Connecticut, US
Fuckin' A, my folks live in Henderson (Green Valley Ranch) I flew back from Vegas on the Monday night redeye.....
By the way, I want to be clear about something, when I talk about raising the level of glamour, I'm not suggesting that all of it sucks. I'm not even saying that most of it that is used commercially (magazines, ads, webwork) sucks. I'm talking about the level of glamour that you see from a lot of shooters frequenting sites like this....
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Paramour Productions wrote:
Fuckin' A, my folks live in Henderson (Green Valley Ranch) I flew back from Vegas on the Monday night redeye.....
By the way, I want to be clear about something, when I talk about raising the level of glamour, I'm not suggesting that all of it sucks. I'm not even saying that most of it that is used commercially (magazines, ads, webwork) sucks. I'm talking about the level of glamour that you see from a lot of shooters frequenting sites like this.... Well then raise the level of ALL photography then because most of the fashion and art on here sucks donkey testicles as well.
Photographer
Giacomo Cirrincioni
Posts: 22234
Stamford, Connecticut, US
Ransom J wrote:
Well then raise the level of ALL photography then because most of the fashion and art on here sucks donkey testicles as well. Yeah, I know, but since I don't shoot that I don't really care about them, dig?
Photographer
Giacomo Cirrincioni
Posts: 22234
Stamford, Connecticut, US
You know what, you're right, fuck everyone. I'll just worry about me....
Photographer
Ransomaniac
Posts: 12588
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Paramour Productions wrote:
You know what, you're right, fuck everyone. I'll just worry about me.... Ahhhhhhhh BRISK!!!
Best quote in the whole thread!
Photographer
Giacomo Cirrincioni
Posts: 22234
Stamford, Connecticut, US
Ransom J wrote:
Ahhhhhhhh BRISK!!!
Best quote in the whole thread! LMAO!!!
|
