Forums >
General Industry >
Models who don't have a clue
We have the term GWC. But we're lacking a good catchy term for their counterparts. GWP just doesn't stick with me. So I propose a new term: "Modoos". I must admit that I can't take credit for this one Studio36uk let it slip in another thread and I think that in a lot of cases it just fits so damn well. Oct 13 06 10:15 am Link So then this would be Modoo Mayhem... pretty much. Oct 13 06 10:17 am Link What context created this term? Oct 13 06 10:25 am Link Just woke up. Please enlighten me. Oct 13 06 10:26 am Link Mowdulls Oct 13 06 10:28 am Link e-string wrote: No context. I just thought it sounded catchy. Oct 13 06 10:33 am Link what the hell's a 'modoo'?? No no no, if a photog who likes boobie or whatever is a 'guy with a camera' he's not a phooooootog or something. That doesn't make sense. So the model has to be something descriptive like... WCH Walking Coat Hanger. Oct 13 06 10:37 am Link John Jebbia wrote: You've got to write that with the ellipsis: = "mod...doo" ellipsis You have to use the ellipsis between "mod" and "doo," writing it as "mod...doo" because there is obviously something missing. Obviously, too, there is also a pause between "mod" and "doo" in the spoken form exactly because there is something missing. The quotation marks set it off in the dialogue. Oct 13 06 11:23 am Link Model version of GWC: Glamour Woman Cancelled Girl Without Cellphone Girl Without Car Girl Without Calling Girl With Chaperone (or no shoot) LOL Oct 13 06 11:34 am Link Michael Kirst wrote: omg.......lol....i like that! Oct 13 06 12:26 pm Link GWC...girl without clue Oct 13 06 12:29 pm Link Allen Coefield wrote: THAT is right on target!! Ohio is the GWC Capitol. A model who is trying hard is driving up from Louisville to Cleveland to shoot with me, while the GWC gurls in CLE wont even show up and have coffee to plan a shoot and exchange ideas on how we are to accomplish their goals. Oct 13 06 12:35 pm Link Meela wrote: Just checked your port... Oct 13 06 12:36 pm Link Allen Coefield wrote: Thats appropriate. Oct 13 06 01:30 pm Link Michael Kirst wrote: OHHH YEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAA.....lol Oct 13 06 01:50 pm Link i missed it....what's a wch? Oct 13 06 01:58 pm Link oh...never mind... "walking coat hanger" got it. i'm up now. Oct 13 06 02:00 pm Link Ahahaha LOVE IT! Oct 13 06 07:59 pm Link will respect that in the morning, we need something dumbass is a tad rude. Oct 13 06 08:01 pm Link Models who don't have a clue Oh I thought this thread was about me. I mean everything is, right? *flips hair and chews gum loudly* Oct 13 06 11:52 pm Link John Jebbia wrote: the finger of blame is pointed in the wrong direction. Oct 14 06 12:22 am Link |