Forums > General Industry > Are implied crotch shots....

Photographer

Robert Randall

Posts: 13890

Chicago, Illinois, US

possible?

Oct 02 06 06:15 pm Link

Photographer

Ransomaniac

Posts: 12588

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

yes.

Oct 02 06 06:16 pm Link

Photographer

eKarl

Posts: 257

Port Huron, Michigan, US

It's there or it isn't.
What's in between?

Oct 02 06 06:16 pm Link

Photographer

Ought To Be Shot

Posts: 1887

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Only on Tuesday.

Oct 02 06 06:17 pm Link

Photographer

Meehan

Posts: 2463

Merrimack, New Hampshire, US

Ahhhhh, I needed this to happen. *arms stretching wide* It's gonna be a long night.

Oct 02 06 06:17 pm Link

Photographer

Robert Randall

Posts: 13890

Chicago, Illinois, US

Meehan wrote:
Ahhhhh, I needed this to happen. *arms stretching wide* It's gonna be a long night.

Tain't nothin to it!

Oct 02 06 06:22 pm Link

Photographer

Tog

Posts: 55204

Birmingham, Alabama, US

"There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area we call....."

Oct 02 06 06:22 pm Link

Photographer

Robert Randall

Posts: 13890

Chicago, Illinois, US

W.G. Rowland wrote:
"There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area we call....."

If I say pus%& here, will I be banned?

Oct 02 06 06:23 pm Link

Photographer

Meehan

Posts: 2463

Merrimack, New Hampshire, US

frumunda?

Oct 02 06 06:23 pm Link

Photographer

Robert Randall

Posts: 13890

Chicago, Illinois, US

Meehan wrote:
frumunda?

It say's New hampshire, but you must be from Wisconsin. Hey wait, this gives new meaning to the term cheese head.

Oct 02 06 06:25 pm Link

Photographer

Meehan

Posts: 2463

Merrimack, New Hampshire, US

Didn't want to look at that all night.

Oct 02 06 06:25 pm Link

Photographer

RBDesign

Posts: 2728

North East, Maryland, US

I find myself explaining the art of the implied crotch shot to people all the time. After I show them the difference between the vulger porno type crotch shot and the artistic statements that can be made only with the implied crotch shots they usually are very enthusiastic to work on such a project.

;=>

Oct 02 06 06:27 pm Link

Photographer

Meehan

Posts: 2463

Merrimack, New Hampshire, US

RBDesign wrote:
I find myself explaining the art of the implied crotch shot to people all the time. After I show them the difference between the vulger porno type crotch shot and the artistic statements that can be made only with the implied crotch shots they usually are very enthusiastic to work on such a project.

;=>

Ah yes, because there is nothing truely finer than an enthusiastic participantless model when it comes to implied crotch shots. I usually offer them a position on my personal staff.

Oct 02 06 06:31 pm Link

Model

Edyn

Posts: 172

Doylestown, Pennsylvania, US

Nude or implied?

My recent contibution to crotch shots...and swore I'd never ever do one! There is a difference, compliments of David Lawrence:

https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=1395998

Oct 02 06 06:32 pm Link

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

RBDesign wrote:
I find myself explaining the art of the implied crotch shot to people all the time. After I show them the difference between the vulger porno type crotch shot and the artistic statements that can be made only with the implied crotch shots they usually are very enthusiastic to work on such a project.

;=>

Example, please?

Oct 02 06 06:33 pm Link

Photographer

RBDesign

Posts: 2728

North East, Maryland, US

Meehan wrote:
Ah yes, because there is nothing truely finer than an enthusiastic participantless model when it comes to implied crotch shots. I usually offer them a position on my personal staff.

LMFAO finally some more out and out sarcasm

Oct 02 06 06:33 pm Link

Photographer

RBDesign

Posts: 2728

North East, Maryland, US

Chip Morton wrote:

Example, please?

I hope this is sarcasm too!

Oct 02 06 06:34 pm Link

Photographer

dfstudios

Posts: 392

Mill Valley, California, US

Meehan wrote:
I usually offer them a position on my personal staff.

Escort to the Personal Knob Polisher?

Oct 02 06 06:39 pm Link

Photographer

yani

Posts: 1041

Matawan, New Jersey, US

Not sure if this is where you were heading but this is my implied spread box:


https://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e217/Yanisworld/s06354w.jpg

Oct 02 06 06:40 pm Link

Photographer

Meehan

Posts: 2463

Merrimack, New Hampshire, US

.syx. wrote:
Nude or implied?

My recent contibution to crotch shots...and swore I'd never ever do one! There is a difference, compliments of David Lawrence:

https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pid=1395998

This is a perfect example of a nice implied crotch shot. Thank you for sharing. This shot would be equally as appealing with a white cotton panty. Had the dress not been such, the shot would suffer.

Oct 02 06 06:40 pm Link

Photographer

Tog

Posts: 55204

Birmingham, Alabama, US

The mind wobbles..

Oct 02 06 06:44 pm Link

Photographer

Mortonovich

Posts: 6209

San Diego, California, US

RBDesign wrote:

I hope this is sarcasm too!

That would be "implied" sarcasm, sir.

Oct 02 06 06:44 pm Link

Photographer

BlackWatch

Posts: 3825

Cleveland, Ohio, US

Are you implying that my crotch is shot? I'm not that old...

Oct 02 06 06:50 pm Link

Photographer

M Pandolfo Photography

Posts: 12117

Tampa, Florida, US

eKarl wrote:
It's there or it isn't.
What's in between?

Careful...asking "what's in between?" when the subject is crotch shots can be dangerous. I expected to hear a drum roll after that one lol.

Oct 02 06 06:51 pm Link

Photographer

M Pandolfo Photography

Posts: 12117

Tampa, Florida, US

Bob Randall Photography wrote:
possible?

Yes...it's no different than an implied erection.

Oct 02 06 06:51 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

I have implied crotch shots of Batgirl. I'm Batman.

Oct 02 06 07:10 pm Link

Photographer

Meehan

Posts: 2463

Merrimack, New Hampshire, US

Ched wrote:
I have implied crotch shots of Batgirl. I'm Batman.

Implied batcave shots?

Oct 02 06 07:12 pm Link

Photographer

Halcyon 7174 NYC

Posts: 20109

New York, New York, US

Indeed. She needs to wash more.

Oct 02 06 07:13 pm Link

Model

Edyn

Posts: 172

Doylestown, Pennsylvania, US

Meehan wrote:

This is a perfect example of a nice implied crotch shot. Thank you for sharing. This shot would be equally as appealing with a white cotton panty. Had the dress not been such, the shot would suffer.

Thank you!

Oct 02 06 07:17 pm Link

Photographer

RBDesign

Posts: 2728

North East, Maryland, US

So much silliness. Maybe I am getting old and jaded but depending on what client I am shooting for I gotta shoot what they need. I might just go into head shots only so I never have to do the same idiotic conversion regarding exactly what kind of nude again. Long ago I just started pointing models to a page illustrating the kind of images that were required on a particular shoot .
Anyone ever done one of these:

M - I only do Playboy style, is that ok?
Me - Sure what edition are you talking about? Just look at the images on at this url and call me back, I try to be sensitive and supportive but after a while you realize that a picture is worth 1000 words with no confusion.

Oct 02 06 07:31 pm Link

Model

Mircalla

Posts: 131

Baltimore, Maryland, US

I have seen alot of implied crotch shots that have been tastefully done and quite clever to boot.

Oct 02 06 08:17 pm Link

Photographer

Meehan

Posts: 2463

Merrimack, New Hampshire, US

.syx. wrote:

Thank you!

Welcome!

Oct 02 06 08:19 pm Link

Model

Beauty of Tiferet

Posts: 533

Cleveland, Ohio, US

Mircalla wrote:
I have seen alot of implied crotch shots that have been tastefully done and quite clever to boot.

Me too.

And Ched? You are SO not Batman.

Just another wannabee. :-P

Oct 02 06 08:21 pm Link

Photographer

Michael J

Posts: 474

Rustburg, Virginia, US

Ok - I'm confused . . .   
How can you do "implied" crotch, when everyone is fully aware that they are there?!?!?!?  Wouldn't that be encroaching on the territory of asexuality?  Much like the aliens that pick me up once or twice a week that seem to have no genitalia?

Oct 02 06 08:24 pm Link

Photographer

RBDesign

Posts: 2728

North East, Maryland, US

Michael J wrote:
Ok - I'm confused . . .   
How can you do "implied" crotch, when everyone is fully aware that they are there?!?!?!?  Wouldn't that be encroaching on the territory of asexuality?  Much like the aliens that pick me up once or twice a week that seem to have no genitalia?

Look, this thread was started as a joke based on some strong opinions of the OP and a stupid thread on the critique board. Then I got sarcastic. Then people started taking it seriously. I'm waiting for it to get funny again while I begrudgingly do my editing.

Oct 02 06 08:31 pm Link

Photographer

Michael J

Posts: 474

Rustburg, Virginia, US

Well, I was joking . . .



(Except for the alien thing.)



LOL

Oct 02 06 08:34 pm Link

Photographer

HerbP

Posts: 546

Winter Springs, Florida, US

I have several implied crotch shots in the Fine Art Nude section of my OMP159478 port.

Oct 02 06 08:40 pm Link