Forums >
General Industry >
Saved from a flake?
Wow...I see both sides of this. As a model, personally, I would be insulted by the request for a deposit. Not dissimilar from what she said, either you trust me or you don't. If you don't, don't shoot with me. Having said that, I have never missed a shoot. It's a job so you treat it like one. On the other hand, if you are getting burned left and right, you do need to do something to bring the situation under control. I don't know if the desposit is the answer or perhaps only shooting with models who have good references from other photographers. Not an easy question, and probably not an easy answer. Sep 24 06 05:14 pm Link Reverend D-Ray wrote: absolutely, and it's non refundable. Sep 24 06 05:20 pm Link Richard Tallent wrote: Good grief! well, I owe you an apology on that score. I've only had a few flakes in my time.. that kind of record would make anyone cautious. Sep 24 06 05:21 pm Link Some of you people are unbelievable. A piece of work. This isn't a complicated issue here. If the model flakes or don't flake, the photographer doesn't loose here. He or she is either getting a model who is going to be there or a flake who isn't and has lost his or her money. There's nothing else to this. No hidden agendas. So why the dramatic responses from some of the dramaqueen photographers? It's if some of you have found some secret hidden messages in the man's post. I bet some of you on here have read the Divinci Code. Sep 24 06 05:33 pm Link Looknsee Photography wrote: Looknsee Photography wrote: I rarely (almost never) do TFP/TFCD -- I think it is a raw deal for the model and is counterproductive to my objectives for the sitting. I do mostly nude photography, and I'm happy to pay the model. That way, I feel that I am in charge and that we are working on concepts that I want to work on. Often, models enjoy the results & have often used the images we make together for their portfolio. But since a) I'm trying to create new art (as opposed to boilerplate portraits), and b) I retain the copyright, I'd rather pay the model. I typically earn enough money from the images to compensate me for her modeling fees. Here's the problem with your point of view here. You are only looking at it from one angle. If you are working on a personal or a project, then yes I can see you paying. But like photographers, models too are looking to add to thier portfolio. Tfcd or tfp isn't a raw deal when both aren't in the position to crank out some notes here, which is why this site and other areas have networking. This helps those to get from point A to point B. It's not a raw deal nor is it a complicated thing to comprehend. Sep 24 06 05:38 pm Link I haven't done this policy myself, but have had a few cases where I've arranged an MUA and had the model not show up, or literally show up at the end of the planned shoot time in which case was as good as a cancel. I still paid the MUA - because I felt that was only fair to her. So in light of that, I can agree to that the model should at least deposit the amount of costs. If she doesn't so - then it's her money being thrown down the drain - not mine. Sep 24 06 08:58 pm Link Stick to your policy and ask for a deposit. The only reason why I don't ask for one is that find that I still have too much free time without a shoot. With TFP, I find myself giving away too much to models that lose interest very quickly or flake most of the time. Sep 24 06 09:54 pm Link |