Forums > General Industry > pre-shoot agreements? what to include? basic form?

Photographer

prophet sound

Posts: 62

Lawrence, Indiana, US

I am aware of the need for model release forms and such.. but am curious to know if people have any imput regarding agreements regarding photos.. what they can expect to get from you.. what will be considered a fair trade for either their time.. or money... i've begun doing paid shoots and figure it's a damn good time to figure it out..

if you have any ideas please either respond here.. or directly to me.. as i don't frequent the forums..

i will however try to keep my eyes open on this thread.

m.

Sep 18 06 05:40 pm Link

Photographer

duds here

Posts: 397

Chicago, Illinois, US

I was at a seminar and the speaker was a well known photographer, can't remember his name, well, he said model releases are a joke.

Here's why, you think if you had a release and/or paid a model some money to shoot, that you can use the image any way you want.

Well start making posters of them and selling them and see how fast they get a lawyer to sue you for the money you are not paying her, because in fair trade, that small fee and a model release doesn't give you the right to take advantage of her.

I have a form which asks for every contact they have phone for house, cell, email address etc. and on it, it has boxes marked assignment, test, portfolio, etc.

And on the form there are lines to fill out, I put down images are to be used for internet and portfolio use only any other use is not allowed.

So we both know there isn't going to be sold as art let's say.  But if you decided to try and sell an image for art, you should contact the model an make some arraingment that both of you feel is fair.


The amount of pictures?  I use to give everthing on a shoot on a CD raw, no retouching etc. because if they want a print they should buy one from me, not walgreens which would make my work look bad.

But I have seen shots that should be out takes used so now I pull those off before I burn a CD.  I never say how many shots I will take or give because you never know how a shoot will go.

I have shot models over and over, and some sessions are so short, but you get great stuff, and sometimes the sessions isn't good.  It happens, so don't promis a number, quantity isn't what you want, quality, is, and sometimes it's the very first shot!

It also depends if you are shooting for one theme like a commercial shoot, for instance you want a girl on a horse in the waves on a beach.  Well after a few takes you have some great images, you're done.  But if you are shooting a general shoot and want to have several outfits and lighting changes, well, then you'll shoot more.

I know, you're saying no kidding, well how do you know how many shots you'll take?

You don't and even if you fill a card everytime. how many will be good? Who knows.

So just say you will give them the selects from the shoot, how many is that?

You won't know until you edit!

When film was used I heard of photogs giving model three slides!  Saying here you go take it and leave!

So they get much more now on CD so don't worry about they won't get enough, your the boss of any shoot, that is the photographers job to control the shoot.

Even in commercial shots, if the shot doesn't come off good, it is the photographers fault. they are in charge and should control everything about a shoot.  Of course then there is reality, but that's another story.

Sep 30 06 03:33 am Link

Photographer

Emeritus

Posts: 22000

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Notwithstanding the post above, what is "fair" is whatever deal you and the model come to that induces both of you to work together.  There are no rules.

I strongly disagree with the comments above about the value of releases, and the obligation of a photographer to contact/compensate a model once the release is signed.  A deal is a deal, whatever it is, be it no releases or full releases.

Sep 30 06 04:16 am Link

Photographer

studio36uk

Posts: 22898

Tavai, Sigave, Wallis and Futuna

TXPhotog wrote:
Notwithstanding the post above,...

I bit my tongue and didn't say a thing about that one. I might have supposed that poster is not in "business" UNTIL I read this in his profile: "Carl is a commercial photographer with over 14 years of shooting studio and location for various studios, companies and advertising agencies around the country."

And he doesn't understand the nature, the purpose or the value of releases???? Come on, pull the other one.

Studio36

Sep 30 06 07:28 am Link

Photographer

StMarc

Posts: 2959

Chicago, Illinois, US

Mr. Anonymous Famous Photographer may think releases are a joke. Perhaps *his* release is funny, I don't know.

But mine isn't.

It was written by two of the best lawyers I know (including your humble correspondent.) I know for a fact it's in total harmony with all the law on the subject in my jurisdiction. And any model who thinks she can break it is welcome to try. I'll chew her up, spit her out, and pick my teeth with the bones of her shyster lawyer.

Metaphorically speaking, of course.

M

Sep 30 06 08:54 am Link

Photographer

studio36uk

Posts: 22898

Tavai, Sigave, Wallis and Futuna

StMarc wrote:
and pick my teeth with the bones of her shyster lawyer.

Metaphorically speaking, of course.

M

ORDER IN THE COURT!....... ORDER IN THE COURT!      smile

https://www.thecards.com/images/bigcards/judge.jpg

Studio36

Sep 30 06 08:26 pm Link

Photographer

CLT

Posts: 12979

Winchester, Virginia, US

Give us... us free!
Give us... us free!

Sep 30 06 08:32 pm Link

Photographer

studio36uk

Posts: 22898

Tavai, Sigave, Wallis and Futuna

CLT wrote:
Give us... us free!
Give us... us free!

Amistad

Studio36

Sep 30 06 08:39 pm Link

Photographer

Jack North

Posts: 855

Benicia, California, US

studio36uk wrote:

Amistad

Studio36

Attica!


really, i don't get it.

Oct 01 06 09:54 am Link

Photographer

MurphyMurphy Studios

Posts: 2315

Denver, Colorado, US

CL Photography wrote:
I was at a seminar and the speaker was a well known photographer, can't remember his name, well, he said model releases are a joke.

Here's why, you think if you had a release and/or paid a model some money to shoot, that you can use the image any way you want.

Well start making posters of them and selling them and see how fast they get a lawyer to sue you for the money you are not paying her, because in fair trade, that small fee and a model release doesn't give you the right to take advantage of her.

Yah, right.  Can you tell me in what States that this is true?  Can you provide me (and everyone else) on this site with actual court cases where this has been decided. 

Mind you, in order to prove your point, you will need to show us NUMEROUS examples where the court has found that the release was VALID under State law and still awarded damages to the model under some concept of "fair trade". 

If what you say is true, there would be NO stock photography industry.  Getty and Corbis are enormous multi-billion dollar companies that have been selling stock images and litigating model release issues for years.  Why are they not out of business?  Why are their clients (who legally must rely on the validity of the release) still buying images from them if "fair trade" can trump the release and make their multi-thousand dollar advert campaign subject to legal challenge from the model.

In your 14 years of Commercial photography experience, have you ever had a model release tossed out due to Fair Trade?

Please show us all of the cases in your State (or any other) that support your claim that ALL releases are a "joke."

Oct 01 06 07:44 pm Link

Photographer

D. Brian Nelson

Posts: 5477

Rapid City, South Dakota, US

In answer to the OP, I don't use a contract or model agreement.  (Model release, for sure.  Gotta have it for most media art buyers, commercial use or not.)  Instead we simply develop an email or message folder talking aobut what's going to happen, who gets what, and so on. 

As long as both folks are aboveboard and honest that's all you really need.  Every model I've worked with has been just fine that way.   (Though I'm behind on finishing big scans for several right now.)

-Don

Oct 01 06 08:38 pm Link

Photographer

Kinetic Photography

Posts: 517

I think its important that regardless of the terms that you make it clear BEFORE the shoot EXACTLY what to expect from the photographer.  Be very detailed and upfront.  Also, let the model know what you expect from them and possibly the people they bring with them.

Oct 01 06 09:06 pm Link

Photographer

American Glamour

Posts: 38813

Detroit, Michigan, US

CL Photography wrote:
I was at a seminar and the speaker was a well known photographer, can't remember his name, well, he said model releases are a joke.

Interesting argument.  Who ever said that an agreement had to be fair to be enforceable?

I have seen this argument before and it reinforces what I have said in the past.  When you need to ask questions about exposure, ask a photographer.  When you need to ask questions about the law, ask a lawyer.

I have a real tough time with this one.

Oct 02 06 12:31 pm Link

Photographer

David Brennan

Posts: 11

New York, New York, US

CL Photography wrote:
I was at a seminar and the speaker was a well known photographer, can't remember his name, well, he said model releases are a joke.

Here's why, you think if you had a release and/or paid a model some money to shoot, that you can use the image any way you want.

Well start making posters of them and selling them and see how fast they get a lawyer to sue you for the money you are not paying her, because in fair trade, that small fee and a model release doesn't give you the right to take advantage of her.

Getty Images is the largest (or second to Corbis?) stock agency in the world, and they rely on a very simple but comprehensive model release: http://contributors.gettyimages.com/img … 406_US.pdf  to cover all of their millions of images for any use up to and including multi-million dollar advertising campaigns. I have a feeling they know what they are doing.

David

Oct 02 06 07:16 pm Link

Photographer

Fannie Dweebowitz

Posts: 14

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

HOW ABOUT THIS FOR A PRE SHOOT REQUEST.

HOW ABOUT THAT THE MODELS SHOW UP LOOKING LIKE THEY DO IN THEIR PICS THEY BLAST ALL OVER THE INTERNET, INSTEAD OF SHOWING UP WITH GIANT NOSES, BAD SKIN AND SHORT AND STUMPY.

HOW ABOUT THAT???????????????????????

Oct 02 06 08:54 pm Link

Photographer

Leonard Gee Photography

Posts: 18096

Sacramento, California, US

I get a lecture from my lawyers all the time - basically they tell me the contract/release/agreements/contracts they craft will cover around 99% of cases if a very good lawyer writes it. The point they try to make is that nothing covers 100%. A good model release, if both sides are fair, will work fine. In no way will it cover all cases.

I have seen case law where the release was over-turned because the renumeration compared to the commercial use was not fair - the photographer should not have been greedy. Many of such cases though, the release was held to be valid despite that. So it can be challenge - but winning is rare.

A e-mail is a fine way to confirm an agreement before the shoot. We had a post where the photographer required the models to sign acknowledgment of the e-mails before the shoot. This was a bit extreme. However, a simple verbal agreement isn't enough. Memories being the way they are - and misunderstandings do happen.

I've had models get the e-mail, had the conditions explained verbally and still space it. All it took was to refer them to the original e-mail to clear it up. In a civil action, e-mails, notes and letters are fine for evidence as long as there's no contravening evidence. I've never had any problems with agency bookings. But to show you how bad it can get, now most the large agencies tape the bookings - most of which are done verbally over the phone.

Be sure to cover:

1. What the photographer will provide the model, prints/CD what photos, how many
2. Who will have the final decision on the photos
3. About how long it will take to finish photos
4. What the model can and cannot do with pictures
5. What the photographer can and cannot do with pictures
6. Who is responsible for what costs, if any
7. What the model should bring with her
8. Date, time, duration (approximate)
9. Contact information
10 Cancellation process
11. If model has ailing mother or grandmother (kidding)

Now all that has to happen is for both sides to stick to the agreements and the model's mother doesn't die. I sincerely apologize in advance for models that have really had a mother die and cancelled.

Oct 02 06 09:27 pm Link