capturecharacter wrote:
uhhhhh... huh?

People dont' read the messages, they respond to, D@mn people!
)

Madcitychel wrote:
Please pay attention.

When I open a thread, I always read it.  There is no point in writing something for the sake of "because".  If you have something to say - it should be something that would make sence at least, but you don't know if you don't read the context.

Everyday there is so many new threads, I personally don't have the time to go over all of them.  I have been latelly choosing threads by the people who create them and who respond.

That's not good.yes.

MEDIC!!!

Ought To Be Shot wrote:
MEDIC!!!

Yes, I am. yes.
Why, do you have any complaints?

Madcitychel wrote:

People dont' read the messages, they respond to, D@mn people!
)

Partly because too many people here are borderline illiterate? ;-)

capturecharacter wrote:
Partly because too many people here are borderline illiterate? ;-)

Who would that be?
Point your finger at that dumb person.please.

Madcitychel wrote:
Please pay attention.

When I open a thread, I always read it.  There is no point in writing something for the sake of "because".  If you have something to say - it should be something that would make sence at least, but you don't know if you don't read the context.

Everyday there is so many new threads, I personally don't have the time to go over all of them.  I have been latelly choosing threads by the people who create them and who respond.

That's not good.yes.

I can't spell but sense I think is how it goes...

Star wrote:
I can't spell but sense I think is how it goes...

Oh, yeah, this is not personally to you, my friend
( I like when people correct me, because it is the only way for me to learn English)

Why is everyone notices wrong spelling and grammer errors, but don't understand see what is the meaning of the thread is? why?

Madcitychel wrote:
Everyday there is so many new threads, I personally don't have the time to go over all of them.

OK.  Thanks for the update.

Madcitychel wrote:
Please pay attention.

When I open a thread, I always read it.

There is no point in writing something for the sake of "because".  If you have something to say - it should be something that would make sence at least, but you don't know if you don't read the context of the thread.

Everyday there is so many new threads, I personally don't have the time to go over all of them.  I have been latelly choosing threads by the people who create them and who respond.

That's not good.yes.

So you've never hijacked a thread or had something irrelevant to say...

LarryB wrote:
OK.  Thanks for the update.

Thanks for the example

See, why people don't understand don't get itread the thread?

Lora wrote:

So you've never hijacked a thread or had something irrelevant to say...

No, I did (and I like it - because I think it is reflects the nature of live comunication).

I am talking about a different issue.

People respond to certain things, not reading the thread - it is pretty clear.
Example:
I say: I've read a book about girl.  I liked the girl described in the book. 

Response:  You definetly need to read the book - it's worth it.

? should I say: "Thanks!" ?

Madcitychel wrote:

Oh, yeah, this is not personally to you, my friend
( I like when people correct me, because it is the only way for me to learn English)

Why is everyone notices wrong spelling and grammer errors, but don't understand see what is the meaning of the thread? why?

Because this thread subject happens about once a month on here. Many of us have already read rantings on the subject. As such we have nothing to say.

Also your original posting gave no question, no basis from which a conversation might stem and so you get nonsensical answers. Structured as it is your OP is not a question, it is a statement of fact. It is an absolute and so no dialogue can organically grow from it.

So in the spirit of the eccentricity of the MM membership you may get nonsensical, I like to think existential, remarks.

Such as "I fear this community has not whit as much as hair...."

or

"And when she was bad she was aweful"

Star wrote:
Because this thread subject happens about once a month on here. Many of us have already read rantings on the subject. As such we have nothing to say.

Also your original posting gave no question, no basis from which a conversation might stem and so you get nonsensical answers. Structured as it is your OP is not a question, it is a statement of fact. It is an absolute and so no dialogue can organically grow from it.

So in the spirit of the eccentricity of the MM membership you may get nonsensical, I like to think existential, remarks.

Such as "I fear this community has not whit as much as hair...."

or

"And when she was bad she was aweful"

That is not what I meant again, however.

The reason I wasn't more clear is because it's too obvious. 

Most of the people don't read the thread before they respond to it.

There are some that do.

I choose threads when I see people who reads responding.  Because they make sense.
:)thx for sp.

capturecharacter wrote:
uhhhhh... huh?

Sure, except on Tuesdays.

MHana wrote:

Sure, except on Tuesdays.

Thanks.
for reading it.