|
Forums >
General Industry >
Doing porn on the side
I don't care if a model's done porn work. Makes absolutely no difference in my photographs. The only time one could argue there's a difference would be if the photographer is trying to do some kind of snickering "here's the virgin undressing" sort of thing, and that's basically...uh...porn. The model's chastity, or lack thereof, and exposure, or lack thereof, have nothing to do with the quality of the resulting photographs. If that kind of thing is important to a photographer, one might want to question his motives. On the flip side, I would think the same would apply to models' attitudes about photographers, with perhaps the exception that a model might believe such a photographer may wish to lure her into doing "bad things." Maybe they do. From my own experience, models are mostly quite willing to do "bad things" outside of porn as well. -Don Sep 08 06 08:12 pm Link 41 Sep 08 06 08:12 pm Link D. Brian Nelson wrote:
Sep 08 06 08:22 pm Link So what side is it better to use to do porn? Sep 08 06 09:27 pm Link Harold Rose wrote: i didn't think Tyler and the mods want this site to go down the porn route (I may be wrong)... it would be nice to have a few sites where porn models/photographers don't begin to take over, just because the $$$ are there. Sep 08 06 11:22 pm Link Doug Lester wrote: Thank you! I don't know what's up with a couple of these photographers lately who feel the need to do the "questionnaire" thing over the phone...asking a bunch of questions not even related to the shoot we are currently planning. It's supposed to be a photo shoot, not a Tikeya W. life story...lol. Sep 09 06 02:03 am Link CareLyn Anita wrote: add one more to your list Sep 09 06 02:08 am Link Vivus Denuo wrote: cmon now, dont you mean get in more? Sep 09 06 02:26 am Link Elizabeth Russell wrote: Doesn't bother me a bit. And honesty is nice. Sep 09 06 02:39 am Link Society changes and evolves, but there is still the faction out there that would view well over half of all the pics on MM to be pornographic in nature. Our society at large has always repressed anything remotely dealing with sex, while in private supporting it with magazine and video purchases. Sex is beautiful and wonderful as is the human form. We have come very far from the times when witches were burnt at the stake for dancing in the moonlight. As artists, let's not go backwards to the days when Lucy and Desi could not be in the same bed together even with pj's on. Let's try and break the barrieres and bonds further by showing how true artists can bring out the true beauty of what has been repressed in our sexual nature, not for exploitation, but for beauty and artistic expression of the human soul. Soapbox over.... Sep 09 06 03:19 am Link W.G. Rowland wrote: lol!!! Sep 09 06 03:24 am Link jonathan ledeux wrote: I like you! Sep 09 06 03:41 am Link A model who does nude work tends to be easier to work with when doing clothed work. And a model who does porn tends to be easier to work with when doing art nude. I've no idea what would make a porn model easier to work with. Sep 09 06 03:52 am Link RStephenT wrote: Because legally he can't. 2257. Sep 09 06 03:54 am Link Lighthouse Studios wrote: I saw that one coming Tommy...LMAO but I still love you Sep 09 06 03:56 am Link BlindMike wrote: And soon to be 2257A for softer stuff. Sep 09 06 05:16 am Link We are all naked under our clothes, most of us have sex, or have sexual activitys. I have nothing against it, i dont do it. But i think it makes no difference to a person, or what they are like, its just an act, and there is a huge market for it. I think its a good thing. Porn is just engaging in sexual activitys but being watched, photographed or filmed. Some people want that, some people dont. I think people should just be open about it. Kimberley Sep 09 06 05:26 am Link Afinity Photography wrote: I know a of few of them myself, but I know more photographers shooting fetish and porn under false names. Sep 09 06 05:50 am Link A man asks his friend if he's doing porn on the side. The friend replied, " I didn't know they moved it." Sep 09 06 06:11 am Link Porn is pornographic! Sep 09 06 11:25 am Link A friend of mine used to do porn-movies. Since everyone can find..um.... stuff of her when googling her name she was taking another name to start the more serious modelling. I wouldn´t do it, but I can understand it a bit. Sep 09 06 11:35 am Link RStephenT wrote: Models are models and photographers are photographers. Sep 09 06 11:45 am Link |
