Forums >
General Industry >
Is 5"11 to short for runway?
Im really keen to get into it. But everyone say's im too commercial...? Sep 04 06 08:29 am Link 5'11" and "too commercial" are not closely related concepts. I don't know who "everyone" is, but if it includes all the fashion agencies in London, then yes, you are too commercial. Or at least "not fashion". Sep 04 06 10:01 am Link What is "too commercial"? Sep 04 06 10:03 am Link Well, for Women 5'11 is defintely not commercial but not so sure about Men's requirments... Sep 04 06 10:04 am Link W.G. Rowland wrote: 1. Generally, "too generic", not distinctive, or "pretty". Sep 04 06 10:04 am Link tx, i think tyra has gotten to him. Sep 04 06 10:05 am Link She's gotten to a lot of people, more's the pity. Sep 04 06 10:21 am Link Tyra a fine lady, but i've never met her. My agency just say's im more suited to comercial work and i wanna know what i could do to prove to them i can do high fashion too. Sep 04 06 10:22 am Link Gare wrote: Do high fashion. Pay an excellent fashion photographer to shoot you in the style of the best fashion men. Show the pictures to your agency. It will work or it won't. Sep 04 06 10:42 am Link in addition, there is a well established/documented racial bias in the fashion inustry. things are better than they were, but the almost automatic response from the industry is to see black and say commercial. Sep 04 06 04:23 pm Link oldguysrule wrote: That is so true, and I work in the fashion industry. Some will even say "too ethnic" as the excuse Sep 04 06 04:27 pm Link I was about to say that 5'11" is definitely not too short for runway, but then I noticed that you're a male model. I'm not sure what the height requirement is for males, but I'm thinking that you might've just made it. I'm not sure. One thing I do know is that my little 5'2" ass can't do runway...lol. Sep 04 06 04:32 pm Link oldguysrule wrote: I have to say that this may not be true in the UK, or at least not to the extent it may be true of the US market. Sep 04 06 04:35 pm Link Tikeya wrote: The requirement is 6'0 for males all the agencies i've been looking into have 6'0 for males as a requirement. Sep 04 06 04:40 pm Link Tikeya wrote: lol! I too thought this was a girl posting and was like 5'11"! wth they arent short at all! I do believe 6' is the min for male runway models. He is so close to that, I'd say put some of those inserts in your shoe! Sep 04 06 04:41 pm Link RED Photographic wrote: Very encouraging to hear. Sep 04 06 04:41 pm Link The only thing I might add, Gare, is that you might have too much of a personality to be a robot clothes horse. Sep 04 06 04:56 pm Link ^^ what he said. Sep 04 06 06:11 pm Link In my humble opinion 1. You have A LOT of personality in your pictures 2. Your pictures are very commercial, but I could definetely see you doing fashion. As previously stated before, get a great fashion photographer. 3. Based upon your pictures, I would not think that you are 5'11. Some of your pictures make you look shorter. I think that with a good fashion photographer, he/she could help you "photograph tall" Is your agency getting you work even based upon your deemed "commercial looks"? ('cause we all know commercial is what pays ... lol) Sep 05 06 03:19 am Link ashara wrote: Thanks Ashara Sep 05 06 06:41 am Link Whenever i have looked on top agencies web sites in london, there requirments are as follows: Women 5'9" and over Men 5'11" and over So you are the right hight, not sure what they mean by to comercial though? Sep 05 06 06:09 pm Link |