Forums >
General Industry >
Why do people use plural w/ "studios"?
When I bet 99% of them only have one.....Hell I could do the same thing and call it "Jay Farrell photography studios" but that still doesn't fool people when they come here and see that I just have the one studio.....small but proud ![]() Sep 03 06 09:02 am Link Is this the best topic that you can think of to start a new thread about? Dude, you need to get out more. Sep 03 06 09:06 am Link Image K wrote: Hey, if the "You don't need a job, you've got Audrey" post can have 35,600 replies, I think this post is fine. Sep 03 06 09:14 am Link I was actually laughing when I typed it. I don't...feel..."hostile". I'm actually in a really good mood, I got a raise last week! Sep 03 06 09:17 am Link Image K wrote: Congrats. Unfortunately, it literally takes an act of Congress to get my raise. :-( Sep 03 06 09:19 am Link Since I chose *studios* instead of *studio*, when I set up my business name and website, I will let you know my reasoning. When someone uses a name like blah-blah studio, it apparently groups you in with vendors who market "Instant Photography Studio, only $499," and such. Since my intent was not to sell equipment, it seemed to be less confusing. Sep 03 06 09:31 am Link Image K wrote: It's a legitimate question.....answer it or get out of the thread? Sep 03 06 10:13 am Link dfstudios wrote: Thanks! Intelligence is appreciated! Sep 03 06 10:15 am Link I asked myself the same question, but we didn't have an answer. Sep 03 06 10:16 am Link Because you are offering several different service(s) out of your studio(s). Sep 03 06 10:21 am Link Because even if you only have one building, you're gonna have more than one room. "Here we have the Senior Portrait studio, and back over here we have the commode studio." Sep 03 06 10:26 am Link Stephen Melvin wrote: Yea that's pretty much it, Sep 03 06 11:03 am Link Jay Farrell wrote: I call mine FlutterBy Studios because I will actually have 2 studios in this building!!! NRK (recording) which is a sister of flutterby!!! so Sep 03 06 11:06 am Link Jay Farrell wrote: Nah, Sep 03 06 11:38 am Link I have one studio. but two names! Sep 03 06 11:41 am Link Jay Farrell wrote: i wish i had .99 for everytime i've asked myself that question Sep 03 06 12:08 pm Link I don't own any studios. Am I in trouble? Sep 03 06 12:19 pm Link SayCheeZ! wrote: Yea I hate that line too......that just says GWC if presented that way! Sep 03 06 12:23 pm Link lotusphoto wrote: Damnit and I thought my Scion got great gas mileage at 33 MPG Sep 03 06 12:23 pm Link Chris Macan wrote: Ditto.. my thoughts exactly. It's not a "marketing technique". I'm not trying to fool anyone. Plus it just rolls off the tounge so much better. Sep 03 06 12:32 pm Link Intensity Studios wrote: Holy $h*t.... Call the fraud department. Next thing you'll tell me is you don't own an Intensity either. hmmmmmmmmmmmmm Sep 03 06 01:16 pm Link I applied for the Studios moniker but was told that I had to have a marketing department before the permit would be issued. I have a casting call out for a marketing department, but am waiting on replies. Sep 03 06 01:46 pm Link TorchGlow wrote: And remember all your images must be shot by torch lighting... no strobes or natural light permitted!!!! Sep 03 06 02:25 pm Link Jay Farrell wrote: Your little Scion only gets 33? My Acura does better than 40 on the highway. I was grateful for that when I drove over 3,000 miles round trip to the Grand Canyon with gas over $3.00 a gallon. Sep 03 06 03:48 pm Link LOL, True that.. I use studios because I am located on a movie lot. The stages are a part of the services I can provide to my cliets. I am not bound only by the location my studio space provides..I actualy have several stages I can use for a client on a big enough budget. Thus Studios.. V Sep 03 06 03:53 pm Link Stephen Melvin wrote: Probably cause it's a box shape, and tachs out kinda high on the highway, but still that's decent enough Sep 03 06 03:53 pm Link Yeah. Some people just gotta represent themselves as something bigger than they are. I was always tempted to do that back when I operated Krueger International Worldwide Global Media Industries. Sep 03 06 09:55 pm Link lotusphoto wrote: Ummm... 7? Does that mean what I think it means? No. I don't want to know. Sep 03 06 10:07 pm Link lotusphoto wrote: Jay Farrell wrote: Prius. 45mpg. At the worst. Sep 03 06 11:02 pm Link I actually think that for photography it isn't the best choice in regards to marketing. Everyone wants to be special, and whe people go to photogropher they are looking for theirs ONLY, images that wouldn't look like anything else. When there are Mr. John's studioS, it makes an impression of franchaising, and gives it this McDonald's feeling. A photo studio, should be like this one special cofee shop you go to... not like the cofee costs $5, it's just that it's special... Sep 03 06 11:40 pm Link Curt Burgess wrote: lotusphoto wrote: Prius. 45mpg. At the worst. You bastard Sep 04 06 02:15 am Link Dave Krueger wrote: I conveniently ignored that part Sep 04 06 02:15 am Link Some things sound better plural. Studios sounds better than studio. -Glenn Sep 04 06 04:39 am Link i thought this was going to be some nitpicking about Latin-derived words, and how the plural of "studio" should actually be "studiae" or something. like people who get all huffy like "it's not STADIUMS, it's STADIA"(insert indignant eye-rolling here). that said, writers need to remember that the word "media" is already plural and takes its modifying pronouns and verbs accordingly. Sep 04 06 09:48 am Link Curt Burgess wrote: lotusphoto wrote: Prius. 45mpg. At the worst. SL-500, i have no idea how many mpg it gets, and i dont care ;-) Sep 04 06 10:06 am Link Stephen Melvin wrote: Gas here is $2.55 yesterday Sep 04 06 10:07 am Link My company uses studiosin its name, lol. We don't even have one, 82 of us work out of our vans and shoot only on locations in 12 states. Sep 04 06 10:08 am Link |