Forums >
General Industry >
photography prenup!
Alot of the photographs I take are of my girlfriend. I would not ask her for a release, because thats almost like saying "when we stop dating i want to make sure i can still use your images". no one wants to think about breaking up. To me, it would be insensitive and asking for trouble. It's like a marriage prenup. Now, as a business practice this isn't a good idea, i realize...But how would you handle the situation?? Sep 01 06 01:34 pm Link Hmmm, I don't think I'd be offended if my significant other asked me to sign a release. Business is business and covering your ass with a release is smart business. If you ever get in legal trouble you'll need the release and proof of age to cover your ass, that's a great way of explaining it to the girlfriend:-) Sep 01 06 01:38 pm Link Lexi Evans wrote: Get her to sign a release. It is indeed saying "when we stop dating i want to make sure i can still use your images," which is a totally logical, common-sense approach. Are you really that sure you're going to be together forever and ever? Sep 01 06 01:42 pm Link sorry, relationships do NOT last forever. Breakups can very NASTY. You need a release from EVERYONE. I want , my stereo, the dog, my CDs , and my fucking photos ! Sep 01 06 01:50 pm Link Lexi Evans wrote: If you have any thought of commercial usage later, you need to either get the release now, or start shooting another girl. Under the best of circumstances, getting a released sign after the fact can be tricky. Load it up with the emotional baggage of a breakup, and the chances of her saying no go up dramatically. Sep 01 06 01:54 pm Link One way to handle it is to tell her that no one will use a photo of her lovely face and figure without seeing the release form first and you are trying to get some into print for her.Not just a white lie either,no media will publish or use an image without a copy of the release first. Sep 01 06 02:26 pm Link Get the release. To this day I regret not getting a release from one of my 1st shoots because i think they were some of my best shots and I can't use any of them without the release. Sep 01 06 02:30 pm Link Explain that its just a matter of records, incase of an audit. Sep 01 06 02:31 pm Link stan wigmore photograph wrote: So in all the pictures of Brittney\Angelina\Paris\Lindsey, doing completely unflattering things, you see in mags, they signed a release? Sep 01 06 03:26 pm Link Iris Swope wrote: They didn't have to....they are considered in the public domain so as long as you don't use those photos in an advertisment you're pretty much free to publish them anywhere. Sep 01 06 04:45 pm Link OMG, FKVPhotoGraphics is right. I agree! (plop). Good job, FKV! (nothing like the occasional voice of experience) -Glenn Sep 01 06 05:21 pm Link |