Forums > General Industry > 2,000 hours on one photoshop image.....

Model

Mary Domingo

Posts: 109

Los Angeles, California, US

it's VERY nice... & INSANE!!!

Aug 18 06 09:02 pm Link

Photographer

Mondragon Gallery ofArt

Posts: 16

Portland, Oregon, US

you have to admire the dedication to his art! He is a purist and a pefectionist. He does not follow the sheep he leads his own way with his own style. I wish I was as good in photoshop as this guy maybe I would put down the camera.....well maybe not. My hats off to his craft!

Aug 18 06 09:02 pm Link

Photographer

UnoMundo

Posts: 47532

Olympia, Washington, US

I could watch anime porno , but I dont.

Aug 18 06 09:07 pm Link

Photographer

DarioImpiniPhotography

Posts: 8756

Dallas, Texas, US

gavin oneill wrote:

my hat is off to him simply coz he can be on his computer for 2000 hours without even having an MM account!? :-/

Probably BECAUSE he has no MM account.

Aug 18 06 09:20 pm Link

Photographer

Jean-Philippe

Posts: 397

Austin, Texas, US

DarioImpiniPhotography wrote:
Probably BECAUSE he has no MM account.

Because he is a painter not a photographer or a model.

Aug 19 06 02:10 am Link

Photographer

Pat Thielen

Posts: 16800

Hastings, Minnesota, US

~Krista~ wrote:

Well, I find the 50mm 1.8 great in the sense that if I took that picture with the aperture wide open you would see like one point in sharp focus and the rest in blur. And not photoshop gaussian blur. Real in camera blur. Okay, now I am making myself hot.

Wow... You get hot geeking out about photography. I think I'm in love!

  wink

Aug 19 06 02:20 am Link

Photographer

Le Beck Photography

Posts: 4114

Los Angeles, California, US

Why use Photoshop when Painter is so much more powerful as a painting app??? Compared to Painter, for this sort of thing, Photoshop is just so primitive.

Aug 19 06 02:49 am Link

Photographer

jZERO

Posts: 57

Miami, Florida, US

Julie Saad wrote:
The only thing that bothers me is that, it is art that requires an explanation before most people will go, "oh....wow."
You know what I mean?

I know exactly what you mean... it just looks like a really clean, crisp picture if you don't know the story. Then when you hear the story behind it...your blown away... but just browsing or at a glace you see it and say "that's a clean shot."

Aug 19 06 02:51 am Link

Photographer

jZERO

Posts: 57

Miami, Florida, US

Jean-Philippe Martin wrote:

Because he is a painter not a photographer or a model.

He could easily create a photographer account and most people would not be able to tell the difference

Aug 19 06 02:54 am Link

Model

Mayanlee

Posts: 3560

New City, New York, US

I'd hate to be him when the hardrive crashes.

Aug 19 06 06:36 am Link

Photographer

ericphotonyc

Posts: 538

Brooklyn, New York, US

http://www.moma.org/exhibitions/2001/gursky/

Gursky uses digital manipulation to creat the image, but not 100% from scratch.

http://www.designboom.com/history/becher.html

The Becher's were his teachers, 100% reality.

Gotta love obsessive Germans!

And speaking of Bauhaus, here is an American contemporary out of Chicago (no manipulation).

http://www.eastman.org/ne/str085/htmlsr … 00001.html

And speaking of no manipulation, check out Joel-Peter Witikin...all darkroom!

http://www.art-forum.org/z_Witkin/gallery.htm

Aug 19 06 07:03 am Link

Photographer

Fotographia Fantastique

Posts: 17339

White River Junction, Vermont, US

It reminds me of artist Liza Lou, who spent 5 years gluing 30 million beads to everything in her kitchen. Amazing, yes, but who has that kind of patience!

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/02/ … 9895.shtml

Aug 19 06 07:12 am Link

Photographer

commart

Posts: 6078

Hagerstown, Maryland, US

Mark Heaps wrote:
I have actually met and spent some time with Bert at a few seminars and different events over at Adobe and local studio.  He actuall specializes in photo realism in photoshop for areas that you cannot get permission to take the photo.  Now he does it just to impress other photoshop people, by wowing them he sells the crap out of his books.  Plus he has his own spot on TechTV, plus he used to work at Industrial Light and Magic, and he left because he was getting bored...BORED!

He worked on many famous movies, like Start Trek Generations, and Spawn, as well as many others.

he's a hell of a nice guy and if you ever want to learn how to create realism so your work doesn't have that "photoshopped look" he could teach you how to paint photorealism on your photos.

Thank you, Mark, because this is really what it's about: computer-generated art, including art derived from photography and made to resemble photographic product.

Here's a proposed simple division for the traditional and illustrator-photographers.

Step One Photography:  Concerned with concept-through-post fidelity to subjects extant in one image recording at a time.  Fielded photojournalists, for example, always practice "Step One Photography".

Step Two Photography: Concerned with interpretation and additional conceptual and illustrative development of any Step One Photograph, compilation, or series.

Step One:

https://www.communicating-arts.com/mdc-ffc/Flowerpot/060819-a-019-r1-488xh.jpg

Step Two:

https://www.communicating-arts.com/mdc-ffc/Flowerpot/060819-a-019-r1-488xhf.jpg

wink

Aug 19 06 07:24 am Link

Photographer

Peter Dattolo

Posts: 1669

Wolcott, Connecticut, US

That is impressive....but the technique looks close to digital animation used in games ect. I could turn on my X-box, PS2 and see about the same quality. He probably works for a game company, the software sounds pretty indepth with 15,000 layers.

So who here on MM that does editing can show him up, or make something comparible?

Aug 19 06 07:53 am Link

Photographer

commart

Posts: 6078

Hagerstown, Maryland, US

Why, Peter--is there any difference left between personal and industrial art?

Beyond "Because it's there" (and the origin of that comes from the day when men actually ventured outdoors to make their mark), what, really, is the point? 

For observation, others work too on high resolution photography . . . so what? 

I have to take another good look at the OP picture--I'm starting to wonder if there were any humans in it.

Aug 19 06 08:45 am Link

Photographer

commart

Posts: 6078

Hagerstown, Maryland, US

And for the record, nope, not one person, not even a reflection of one in car window, in Bert's scene.

Aug 19 06 08:47 am Link