Forums >
General Industry >
I'm blind
I just saw a 14 yr old in a thong on that other site. Quickly, I closed it out and ran to the bathroom to wash out my eyes with soap. It burns. I can't see. Thank God I don't hunt and peck when I type. Aug 17 06 09:51 pm Link That's why baush & lomb recommend gouging one's eyes out with spoons.. Much gentler.. Aug 17 06 09:53 pm Link that aughta teach ya NOT to view that "other site".... stay where its safe john. Aug 17 06 10:00 pm Link My vision suffers as well Aug 17 06 10:02 pm Link Geesh... Thongs look terrible on most people in any case, but a 14 year-old? Yuck. I had a conversation the other day with some friends who were both mothers of very young girls, and they were very distressed at what kids are doing these days. I swear, the Monica Lewinsky deal changed everything. At least, that seems to be where the 'break' occurred. Aug 17 06 10:19 pm Link Stephen Melvin wrote: Monica went to Washington with a plan, dont blame Clintion,Remember her quote to her friends before she left. Aug 17 06 10:21 pm Link John Jebbia wrote: That is why I don't like the "other" site....however I should take you to the local Wal Mart and show you some THINGS to burn your eyes. Aug 17 06 10:30 pm Link UnoMundo Photography wrote: I'm not blaming anybody. That's just when it seemed to change. That said, Clinton was the first one to really insist that BJ's aren't sex. The kids seem to have taken that and run with it. I even once heard a young woman claim she was still a virgin, but she also said she had given every boy she knew the presidential treatment. Aug 17 06 10:40 pm Link I told 'ya not to be lookin' at THAT. Now check your palms. Studio36 Aug 18 06 03:05 am Link Um...this "kids today" stuff is funny. When I was in High School in the early 70's the BIG fashion look for girls my age was either skin tight double knit tops or semi-sheer shirts with no bra under then. See-Thru was the name of the game back then. People have this weird fantasy about a clean, non-sexual past that has never existed, at least not since the 50's. Aug 18 06 05:33 am Link what makes you think the 50's were so clean? Aug 18 06 11:59 am Link David Allen Smith wrote: Yeah, google "vintage porn". I've seen 50's b/w photos that make much of today's stuff look tame in comparison. 1890's images fer that matter. People are perverted immoral sex freaks. Doesn't matter the era. Aug 18 06 12:07 pm Link Hey that's my line! Aug 18 06 12:10 pm Link Can you tell me what site you were on so I can avoid it in the future. Aug 18 06 12:48 pm Link Blind? What, I thought? 'Just have a professional epiphany? A 14 y-old with a thong? Now youâre blaming your American morality. Or are you? âAlways meeting the morality standards, John? I have to conclude that this thread is merely to relieve boredom! Aug 18 06 02:38 pm Link Bob Randall Photography wrote: and the model number. Hate to type it in accidentally. Aug 18 06 04:13 pm Link She's 14, let her have her moment of narcissism and get over it. In 10 years her ass will probably look like 30 pounds of chewed bubblegum anyway. Aug 18 06 04:17 pm Link A 14 year old in a thong? Big friggin deal. One of the most popular beaches here in san diego is covered in little teenie boppers in thongs and brazilian cut bottoms. They show alot of crack or alot of cheek. One friend of mine lets her daughter wear stuff like this and thinks its cute. As long as they arent nude who cares. Aug 18 06 04:17 pm Link What's the big deal, assuming it was not part of a pornographic shoot or anything? Aug 18 06 04:24 pm Link Surreal Eye Studio wrote: JSMPASCAOMM, LMAO twice! Aug 18 06 04:27 pm Link Curt Burgess wrote: Uh, yeah, you know, just in case. Aug 18 06 04:27 pm Link Stephen Melvin wrote: Sounds like something my parents would say Aug 18 06 04:28 pm Link Stephen Melvin wrote: :::WARNING!! The following statements contain sarcasm and lies::: Aug 18 06 04:37 pm Link He never said it was a girl. Aug 18 06 04:41 pm Link Bob Randall Photography wrote: LOL Aug 18 06 04:45 pm Link Surreal Eye Studio wrote: *snort Aug 18 06 04:51 pm Link |