Forums > General Industry > Skin softening - yes or no?

Photographer

ErichDrazen Photography

Posts: 413

Atlanta, Georgia, US

I have read on several model portfolios that none of their images have been touched-up. I aslo remember reading an article online showing all the manipulations that go into modern glamour images (in magazines). So, I was wondering what the models here (as well as photographers and stylists) think of the use of skin softening and other touch-up techniques (assuming they are done well). Do you prefer to have your images touched up in this manner or not, and why?
Thanks.

Aug 09 06 04:05 pm Link

Model

Josie Nutter

Posts: 5865

Seattle, Washington, US

I do believe in using Photoshop's band-aid tool to remove things like pimples, undereye circles, etc without altering the texture of the skin.

I do not believe in going over every square inch of skin with the Gaussian blur until the model looks like an airbrushed painting.  If any of my photos look like that, it wasn't me who did it.

Aug 09 06 04:27 pm Link

Photographer

S

Posts: 21678

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US

I'm not wild about softening, but I do carefully retouch portraits in particular.  My theory is this: cameras capture far more information than our eyes notice and document when we're looking at someone.  When I photograph them I attempt to show them as they are on their best, most well-rested day.  That means taking out skin bumps, softening laugh/frown lines so they don't dominate the image, removing under-eye purple smudges, etc.  Hopefully the resulting image looks exactly like the person who sat for it - at their very best.

If I'm shooting figure work with a model with very good skin, often no retouching is necessary at all.  (Body skin seems to often have fewer blemishes than faces.)  For example, the most recent picture in my portfolio is from a shoot last night that I did with Crystal, and I didn't have to do any retouching at all - she's got great, glowing, lightly tanned skin.  It's flawless as is.  The same is true for almost all my figure work, now that I think about it.

Aug 09 06 04:33 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

No one has flawless skin.  No one.

Unless you want flawed skin in your photos (and this is a legitimate desire) all photos need some amount of retouching.

But what people consider "skin softening" is rarely good retouching.  Skin softening is usually used to eliminate details from skin.  This is bad.  Good retouching is done on a pixel-by-pixel basis.  It's hard work, takes serious skills, and is time intensive.  Skin softening is a quick fix.

Aug 09 06 04:39 pm Link

Model

Gabrielle Helms

Posts: 613

Phoenix, Arizona, US

ErichDrazen Photography wrote:
I have read on several model portfolios that none of their images have been touched-up. I aslo remember reading an article online showing all the manipulations that go into modern glamour images (in magazines). So, I was wondering what the models here (as well as photographers and stylists) think of the use of skin softening and other touch-up techniques (assuming they are done well). Do you prefer to have your images touched up in this manner or not, and why?
Thanks.

As a model I use Jergens Natural Glow, it evens skin tones VERY WELL!!!

Aug 09 06 04:41 pm Link

Photographer

S

Posts: 21678

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US

Brian Diaz wrote:
No one has flawless skin.  No one.

I maintain that I've photographed people whose bodies didn't/don't need retouching for blemishes.  On faces I agree with you...mostly.  I've seen some pretty flawless teenagers.  Youth (and therefore skin elasticity) helps a lot in this regard.

Aug 09 06 04:46 pm Link