|
Forums >
General Industry >
what's wrong with art nude?
Nudity is not a bad thing. can i just say that? we were born nude and there is no shame in it of course tacky photos can be taken, they're all on the web nudity should not equate to tacky, showing bits off...ergh rather it should be natural. when a model actually WANTS to use her body as a piece of art, that's okay. Jul 24 06 08:44 am Link Jul 24 06 08:50 am Link Ummm...yep. It's also okay if he/she wants to be shot bent over the back seat of a car behind a seven eleven... That's the beauty of freedom of expression. Jul 24 06 08:52 am Link Jacinta Lee wrote: Thing is those "bits" ARE natural Jul 24 06 01:23 pm Link Because that tacky crap sells. I agree 100% that a model should shoot nudes and not be concerned. Unfortunatly, too many little boys get off on seeing a naked woman in tacky situations. All I can say is that maybe MAYBE they will grow up. Jul 24 06 01:34 pm Link whether a model is shooting nude as a form of art, or shooting the "tacky" photos--either is perfectly fine, as long as she is comfortable with what she is doing. b/t/w, those "tacky photos" all over the web are part of a multi-billion dollar industry... Jul 24 06 02:19 pm Link Jacinta Lee wrote: So long as the model is paid because TFP nudes arent good I mean, afterall They should get paid something! Jul 24 06 02:28 pm Link Jacinta Lee wrote: If you want to move to Bellingham, I will take pictures of you everyday!!! Jul 24 06 07:29 pm Link Jul 24 06 07:32 pm Link Jacinta Lee wrote: Here's the thing Jacinta... DigitalSwede is sorta right. Jul 24 06 07:33 pm Link Model Sarah wrote: Jul 24 06 07:35 pm Link Jacinta Lee wrote: and rest assured, i intend to die nude. Jul 24 06 07:36 pm Link what's wrong with art nude?
Jul 24 06 07:37 pm Link Model Sarah wrote: Jul 24 06 07:38 pm Link I have been working in the UK attempting to deliver ART in photography for two years. I work soley in the field of Fine Art Nudes - and juxtapose the female form in or place it in sympathy with natural and man made environmnts. I do not attempt to creat any sexual tension - an will not work with models who are ovretly sexual, - WE are tying to deliver images that challenge, please and tempt the eye with shape, depth, texture and colour. There can not be anything wrong with this. The female form has been the basis of human art for millenia, - negativity only enters the arena whewn the intent of the three individuals concerned (The Model, The Photographer -or the Viewer is suspect). Visit my web site - www.fineart.me.uk to see examples of my imagry. Jul 25 06 02:14 am Link nothing. Jul 25 06 02:20 am Link Umm. Did someone say there was anything wrong with art nude? Jul 25 06 02:21 am Link _Cinnamon_ wrote: You occasionally see a post by some uptight wad who equates nudity and models who pose nude as immoral or trashy. Jul 25 06 02:26 am Link KM von Seidl wrote: what's wrong w/Immoral & Trashy??? Jul 25 06 02:27 am Link SLE Photography wrote: you heathen. I'll pray for your soul. Jul 25 06 02:29 am Link KM von Seidl wrote: I know you're right. But why on earth would such a person be on MM? Jul 25 06 02:31 am Link KM von Seidl wrote: I have a better idea...you coming to FetCon? Jul 25 06 02:32 am Link _Cinnamon_ wrote: Good question! Jul 25 06 02:33 am Link art fart wish this term could be banned... overused meaningless also wish we could ban the word nude and just say naked... thats raw and keeps you all from thinking 'art'. Jul 25 06 02:37 am Link SLE Photography wrote: I'd buy you a drink if you bought the sushi! Jul 25 06 02:41 am Link oldguysrule wrote: Here.. Here.. The word art just heaps a pile of pretension on a much simpler concept: trying things.. Jul 25 06 02:41 am Link oldguysrule wrote: I don't agree; it is a perfectly useful term and describes the intention of the work. Granted, it is overused, but it is still a very viable term. And "nudity" means something different than "naked." While I've shot many nudes, I don't think I've shot many "naked" people (if that makes any sense). There is a subtle difference and I think that difference is a good thing. Jul 25 06 02:41 am Link oldguysrule wrote: Aaaaaaaaaah, hold on, ...................~~ naked ~~ Jul 25 06 02:43 am Link They don't make bad nudes. Just bad photographers  Jul 25 06 02:43 am Link oldguysrule wrote: I'd rather keep nude and naked as they are. Jul 25 06 02:52 am Link KM von Seidl wrote: This is very true. You don't have to be nude to be naked. Jul 25 06 02:55 am Link oldguysrule wrote: phfffttt . . . I like nekkid. Jul 25 06 02:55 am Link BlindMike wrote:
Jul 25 06 02:57 am Link Had some problems Jacinta?  A lot of (ignorant) people aren't accepting of nude work at all, most can't define the difference between artistic and erotic. Your art nudes are beautiful, cleverly posed and just stunning to view. I don't see erotica in them but everyone looks at photos with a different perspective (and if their head is in the gutter already....) Keep working in what you love and be proud of it - if i were you, I would be!Jul 25 06 03:11 am Link SayCheeZ! wrote: GOD . . . MY EYES!! I'M BLIND!!!! I'M BLIND!!!!! Jul 25 06 03:18 am Link SayCheeZ! wrote: Oh no! It can't be! Please, please, tell me that's not, ............ not Santa! Jul 25 06 03:23 am Link Bruce Talbot wrote: LOL Jul 25 06 03:25 am Link Model Sarah wrote: Jul 25 06 03:05 pm Link Good day to you all. Would some one please explain why some one should be paid for doing nudes and not for posing clothed. I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND THAT??? Jacinta Lee wrote: So long as the model is paid because TFP nudes arent good I mean, afterall They should get paid something! Jul 25 06 03:13 pm Link DigitalSwede wrote: sorry, what was that? Jul 25 06 11:44 pm Link |
