Forums > General Industry > No Nudes, No shoot, no money???

Photographer

ShadowCrafter

Posts: 1523

Pike Road, Alabama, US

I enjoy meeting and shooting with some younger models with limited experience. 

Iwonder if they understand that most folks who have shot for a while just look on when they see the      NO NUDES  post in a profile.

Do you think they believe that proclaiming their purity will get them the glamour edgy shoots.  How many photogs are shooting victorian fully clothed, no skin shots out there??

Just wondering if you would all keep me  abreast of the current tensions in the business.
I'm sure to get a stiff jolt or two here from some who are firm in their convictions and some who are a little skimpy in their coverage of the topic.

SC

Jul 20 06 10:15 pm Link

Photographer

Leonard Gee Photography

Posts: 18096

Sacramento, California, US

It mainly depends on the type of photographer. If you're doing art or nude photos - the answer is obvious. If you're doing commercial work, why should it matter? Either the model does or doesn't. There are two sides to this coin for the photographer and the model.

For the commercial model:

1. She won't do nudes and still will get messages asking her to do nudes anyway.
2. She won't do nudes and the photographers that want nudes don't have to ask. But at least she will be targeting the market she wants.

For the commercial photographer:

1. He doesn't waste his time asking for the wrong models.
2. The models that don't do nudes are probably better qualified for the type of work he's doing anyways.

You realize that there's a preoccupation on the internet with nudes, how can I touch her, get her nipple erect, snatch wet with out offending or having her escort beat me up.... and so on. More to the point, now tell me why they're so concerned with bringing escorts in the first place?

A model drops her clothes and 90% of the photographers may not care if she can pose, get a good expression or have her nails trimmed. It's easy. Much harder to get a model that knows what she's doing in front of a camera.

Jul 20 06 10:51 pm Link

Photographer

Worlds Of Water

Posts: 37732

Rancho Cucamonga, California, US

No Nudes, No shoot, no money?

Here's my take on that quote... No nudes?... well... that works for me... dont shoot'm... limited marketability... none in my port... No shoot?... not even... PLENTY of shoots... at least one every month for close to 15 years... No money?... that doesnt work for ANYBODY.  Photographers (with talent and marketing abilities) will and should always be able to find a way (either directly or indirectly) to turn the images they capture into cash.  Models (with potential) will always get the cash assignments, snag some complimentary images and tearsheets while networking and booking future paid gigs.  That's the way the cookie crumbles... wink

Jul 20 06 11:13 pm Link

Photographer

J Merrill Images

Posts: 1412

Harvey, Illinois, US

Leonard Gee Photography wrote:
You realize that there's a preoccupation on the internet with nudes, how can I touch her, get her nipple erect, snatch wet with out offending or having her escort beat me up.... and so on. More to the point, now tell me why they're so concerned with bringing escorts in the first place?

Actually, no I don't realize this. What I do realize is that there is a fascination on internet modeling sites with the thought that every photographer who wants to do nudes is some sort of a perv. Just as there are people in any walk of life with bad intentions, there are a few here. There are probably a great many more who simply have an appreciation of the art form. Interest in nudes as art is as old as art its-self. I think the "GWC Screamers" should just get a life because they seem to be a great deal more hung up on the issue than the art photographers and models.

Jul 20 06 11:24 pm Link

Photographer

Merlinpix

Posts: 7118

Farmingdale, New York, US

Well color me pervy: actually I'm a provert I take nude, erotic, and kinky, nude erotic, shots exclusively, and sell them to magazines and websites.
This has been my market for years. I've made other sales; but no other market has proved as profitable for me.
Do I touch models, yes if it's necessary, if it's unnessary no.
Do I shoot nonnude models;  mostly no, unless their paying me.
DO I pay models: yes, unless their shooting for free for  exposure,or paying me to shoot them.
Do I solicit models that don't do nude work: rarely, but then only for a nonnude shoot .
Do models that don't do nude work or just 'implied' solicit me: all the time: go figure?

Paul

Jul 21 06 01:09 am Link

Photographer

Malloch

Posts: 2566

Hastings, England, United Kingdom

Will I book a model who does nudes for commercial work. Yes I would. Simple economics really. I prefer to work on a day rate basis so if the commercial work takes 4 hours I can do the rest of the day with fine art work which is sold as limited edition prints. That way the model gets a full days work I get the images I need for my client and images for my own personal fine art work.

Jul 21 06 01:15 am Link

Photographer

re- photography

Posts: 1752

San Francisco, California, US

ShadowCrafter wrote:
I enjoy meeting and shooting with some younger models with limited experience. 

Iwonder if they understand that most folks who have shot for a while just look on when they see the      NO NUDES  post in a profile.

Do you think they believe that proclaiming their purity will get them the glamour edgy shoots.  How many photogs are shooting victorian fully clothed, no skin shots out there??

Just wondering if you would all keep me  abreast of the current tensions in the business.
I'm sure to get a stiff jolt or two here from some who are firm in their convictions and some who are a little skimpy in their coverage of the topic.

SC

I'm not sure I understand what you are talking about. I'm a younger photographer, and I've always considered photography about creating an image which presents not only a subject, but an idea, or feeling through the styling and technical production of the image. As such, what difference does it make if a model wants or does not want to pose nude; it's their perogative, and no one should judge them either way for it. Have I shot varying degrees of nudity, yes, not of my own idea, mind you. I've shot head shots of elderly men as well. The experience is necesarilly different, but the process and results are no less rewarding either from a personal or professional standpoint. I'm not in the business of photography to get off shooting photos of naked women; such people are hobyists, not professionals, that they may make money from these photos is secondary. I tend to think of photography in terms of forms and lighting, and color if the image reccorded is color, and how these elements may be combined to express an idea. I'm not gay, a prude, or anything else someone may sling at me, but honestly, I've been more titilated by reading early 20th century Russian prose than I have by shooting models in any state of undress. When I'm shooting, I'm concentrating on working, social life and entertainment is another entity.

Jul 21 06 01:30 am Link

Photographer

Rp-photo

Posts: 42711

Houston, Texas, US

ShadowCrafter wrote:
I enjoy meeting and shooting with some younger models with limited experience. 

Iwonder if they understand that most folks who have shot for a while just look on when they see the      NO NUDES  post in a profile.

Do you think they believe that proclaiming their purity will get them the glamour edgy shoots.  How many photogs are shooting victorian fully clothed, no skin shots out there??

You make a good point.

This and other such "demands" in a portfolio are turnoff. Even if a photographer was not planning on shooting nudes with a model, declaring "no nudes" may cause them to look elsewhere.

Other potentially offensive "demands" include:

Pay only

MUA required

Shoot details required

Professional photographers only

Good cameras only

A picture is worth 1000 words. The best way for a model to express the range of styles they wish to shoot is to show work of that range in their portfolios, with the understanding that new models may need the pictures first. In that case, careful wording will be required.

Jul 21 06 01:19 pm Link

Photographer

zmix

Posts: 15

New York, New York, US

I do mostly fine-art stuff... non commercial. I love shooting nudes because I feel that the female form has infinite resources for interesting imagery. When I see "No Nudes" in a model's profile, I just move along. There seems to be an unhealthy puritanical attitude about nudity, especially in the US and the midwest in particular. It's a pity.  Beyond insidious puratinism the major cause of the "No Nudes" declaration seems to be poor body image or low self esteem.

I only take issue when a model implies that nudity would somehow lessen or compromise them. That is implicitly judgemental and feeds the low self esteem machine....

-CZ

Jul 21 06 01:28 pm Link

Photographer

ActionShots Photo

Posts: 182

Barboursville, West Virginia, US

ShadowCrafter wrote:
I enjoy meeting and shooting with some younger models with limited experience. 

Iwonder if they understand that most folks who have shot for a while just look on when they see the      NO NUDES  post in a profile.

SC

I would take a basic exception to the thought that 'most folks who have shot for a while just look on'. I have been getting paid for shooting since 1987 (I was 18 at the time) and have never used NO NUDES as a deterrant to contacting anyone. Of course, I do not shoot nudes anyway.

I have a great respect for many of those who have the circumstances to allow them to explore the artistic nature of the nude form, and there definately is a market for it (especially online). Sure, there are a few pervs scattered around that give it all a 'dirty' name, but that is true with any profession or hobby.

In my small community and basically rural area, there is something to be gained by NOT working with nudes. There is a guy across town whos business is suffering greatly because 'he's a perv' and people choose to work with me instead... it also makes my girlfriend much more comfortable leaving that area to someone else.

Basically, what I guess I mean is that it is only a deterrant to someone who was planning on shooting nudes with that particular model. I think more problems arise from someone trying to talk a model into something after they get together... better to know going in.

Jul 21 06 01:48 pm Link

Photographer

CAP603

Posts: 1438

Niles, Michigan, US

rp_photo wrote:
Other potentially offensive "demands" include:

Pay only

MUA required

Shoot details required

Professional photographers only

Good cameras only

You forgot a few:
require shared copyright
Hi res CD with retouced images by the time I leave
For my safety I always bring along my manager "Mad Dog" Mike
smile

Jul 21 06 01:55 pm Link

Photographer

Marie-Eve Fast

Posts: 5

Niverville, Manitoba, Canada

Leonard Gee Photography wrote:
A model drops her clothes and 90% of the photographers may not care if she can pose, get a good expression or have her nails trimmed. It's easy. Much harder to get a model that knows what she's doing in front of a camera.

Thank you.

I don't do nude, doesn't mean I won't show skin, but I have my limits, and it's not cuz I think I'm so "pure" or something like that, but I'm just not interested.  I'm into fashion, that's what I like to do, and there isn't much fashion in full nudity.  ha!

Just my opinion.

Jul 21 06 02:01 pm Link

Photographer

phcorcoran

Posts: 648

Lawrence, Indiana, US

I believe that whether a model does nudes is up to their own personal choice.  I like models who choose to do nudes and I don't criticize model who choose not to.

I do believe strongly that a model shouldn't put no nudes in their profile.  I feel they should list what work they will do, not what they won't do.  I don't photograph minors, but I don't put "no children" on my website.  When a call comes in for work that I don't want, I politely refer the caller to a photographer who does do that kind of work.  This business method is called networking.  It is good, and is widely used by successful people.

Jul 21 06 04:06 pm Link

Photographer

Miles Chandler

Posts: 647

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

phcorcoran wrote:
I do believe strongly that a model shouldn't put no nudes in their profile.  I feel they should list what work they will do, not what they won't do.  I don't photograph minors, but I don't put "no children" on my website.  When a call comes in for work that I don't want, I politely refer the caller to a photographer who does do that kind of work.  This business method is called networking.  It is good, and is widely used by successful people.

Gosh, I couldn't disagree more- no offense. The nicest thing a model can do from my point of view is put NO NUDES on their portfolio if they don't do nude work. That way I don't waste my time contacting them, and they don't get emails about work that doesn't interest them! Similarly if they only do paid work, etc., tell me upfront, I appreciate it.
As for not sounding negative (by saying "no children" etc), I find it bizarre that your own MM page has a big sign on the front page saying "I am not looking for new models"..

Jul 21 06 10:26 pm Link

Model

Ximena Barreto

Posts: 670

Monterey, California, US

Marie-Eve Fast wrote:

Thank you.

I don't do nude, doesn't mean I won't show skin, but I have my limits, and it's not cuz I think I'm so "pure" or something like that, but I'm just not interested.  I'm into fashion, that's what I like to do, and there isn't much fashion in full nudity.  ha!

Just my opinion.

Great point!!!  I am in your camp!  everybody has limits, and everybody should respect those limits on BOTH sides of the lens!

If getting nipples hard is important...than maybe you have already crossed over that elusive line of art/porn....hmmmmm>????

Jul 21 06 10:37 pm Link

Photographer

Sophistocles

Posts: 21320

Seattle, Washington, US

Ximena Bright wrote:
If getting nipples hard is important...than maybe you have already crossed over that elusive line of art/porn....hmmmmm>????

You think?

https://img4.modelmayhem.com/060627/15/44a1928c3bb2d.jpg

Jul 21 06 10:44 pm Link

Photographer

Miles Chandler

Posts: 647

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Ximena Bright wrote:
If getting nipples hard is important...than maybe you have already crossed over that elusive line of art/porn....hmmmmm>????

I live and shoot in Nova Scotia- and if you're shooting outdoor nudes up here, ALL the nipples are hard! You don't have any choice in the matter:-)

Jul 21 06 10:45 pm Link