Forums >
General Industry >
getting paid
This is supposed to be my first paying job (this weekend). It's for a tanning bed company. I asked the photog about compensation and he said: When it's finished, I give it to them, they pay me and they pay you, directly. I'll get your information from you and then give it to them with my information so we can get paid. I would say we'll get paid in about four to six weeks. It'll take ma about two weeks to actually get the pictures developed, and designed into a promoaionl poster, etc. Then, I'll send it to them, we'll make some tweeks, and then they'll cut us a check from their accounting department. I'd give middle August as to when you'll receive a check from the tanning bed company. Is this normal? Jul 13 06 06:25 pm Link This doesnt sound too abnormal I guess. Photographers regularly get strung along for 30-90 days on payment from big companies with slow accounting departments. -steve Jul 13 06 06:31 pm Link Well depends on who wanted the shoot. If it was me taken the pictures and wanted to do the shoot then I would think I would pay the model and then I would get paid from who ever. If that makes any sence Jul 13 06 06:31 pm Link If the client is hiring you, then yes it's not the best, but it's not abnormal. If it's the photog hiring you then unless you've agreed to some sort of terms with them, then he should pay you the day of the shoot and bill it to the client. Jul 13 06 06:34 pm Link Cat Platz wrote: What if the client doesn't like the poster and decides not to pay or asks for a reshoot? Jul 13 06 06:34 pm Link Thank you very much. Jul 13 06 06:35 pm Link if you don't get money right away, you better sign some paper work that specifies the amount of payment. Jul 13 06 06:36 pm Link Dave Krueger wrote: You as a photographer should have something written up between client and photog. I have re-shot many times the same thing for one company in particular and get paid each and every time. Time is money (as well as material labor). In this case I think....keep on disliking (not the photos but the layouts they choose etc.) Kaaaaching! Jul 13 06 06:36 pm Link Luther wrote: That's exactly what I said. That has to be done. Non-negotiable. Jul 13 06 06:37 pm Link Cat Platz wrote: And the timeline (your terms). Don't leave this part out. Clients generally don't like to pay right away because they sit on interest as long as they possibly can. Get it all in writing. This is typically what an agent does, but if you're acting on your own, it's up to you. Jul 13 06 06:40 pm Link Michael Kirst wrote: Dave Krueger wrote: You as a photographer should have something written up between client and photog. I have re-shot many times the same thing for one company in particular and get paid each and every time. Time is money (as well as material labor). In this case I think....keep on disliking (not the photos but the layouts they choose etc.) Kaaaaching! I wasn't asking in terms of the photographer. I was asking in terms of the model. In other words, I'm wondering if she knows she's going to get paid no matter what. Jul 13 06 06:50 pm Link StevenNoreyko wrote: Unless you offer a discount, any company worth a damn is not going to pay until the check is due. They're going to hang onto that money as long as possible. Jul 13 06 06:52 pm Link Dave Krueger wrote: Right you are. Obviously in terms of something that was not the clients fault I suspect I would do the same thing in terms of a re-shoot. As far as the model getting paid no matter what, I think she needs to put that out there with whoever is actually doing the hiring (of her, the model). On her part, sitting around half guessing with verbal agreements will most likely get her burned in the end. Jul 13 06 06:59 pm Link Cat Platz wrote: Yes, it's normal. Jul 13 06 08:32 pm Link |