Forums >
General Industry >
School Me On Aviation Shoots
I have a potential opportunity for a unique aviation shoot in the near future. What makes it unique is the model herself (I can't go into full detail on it right now due to some possible contract issues with her new job). But this model is a hobbyist pilot also and wants to do some serious aviation photos, re-creations, etc. (on the ground). While I have already received permission from a small local airport to shoot there, I'm not sure how to approach plane owners to get permission (or how to find out who owns specific planes, how to find planes we want to shoot with, etc.). Anyone have experience doing shoots at airports and have any tips or possible pitfalls to avoid? Jun 27 06 10:59 pm Link Yup, lots of experience. First, make sure you understand where you can and can not go on an airport. If it is a small, non-aircarrier airport with minimal security considerations, this should be relatively easy. Talk to airport management to make sure you understand your responsibilities. Don't go wandering out near taxiways or runways. Most airports have at least one "FBO" (Fixed Base Operator), which is basically a private terminal. Once again, if it is a small airport, chances are the FBO will have a bulletin board and they will let you post a 3" x 5" card advertising for planes to use in your shoot. Offer the owners of the aircraft photos in exchange. You will probably find a couple who will let you use their Cessna, Piper, etc. They will, of course, want to be there. Providing pictures of a sexy model in/on their airplane might serve as an additional inducement. If the airport is large enough to have business jets and/or air carrier operations, be very careful where you go. Do not stray out of the area that you have been permitted to use. Just think in terms of the security that you have to go through on a commercial flight. Airport mamangement and/or security will not be amused if you go wandering about. You could even find yourself facing federal charges because air carrier airports are certificated by the FAA as such (14 CFR, Part 139) and are subject to all kinds of Federal rules. Also, do not take photos of the biz jets or turboprops w/o specific permission - corporate flight departments are very big on security too and they will not want you taking photos of their "executive mailing tubes!" The best way to go about doing this shoot is to get to know an aircraft owner and just get them to bring you to the airport and serve as your chaperone/host. By doing this, you will probably end up with a plane to shoot and not get yourself into trouble by doing something you shouldn't. Have fun with it! Jun 28 06 12:36 am Link enjoy, aviation and glamour once you start theres no going back. Jun 28 06 12:39 am Link Sleepy Weasel wrote: Boy....glad you said on the ground.....recently American Photographer ran an article about a very well know arial photographer and his shooting platform was an old B-17 bomber with the rear gun turret replaced with a seat exposed to the open.... Jun 28 06 07:04 am Link Thanks everyone. The airport I have permission for is a small country airport. The model takes flight lessons and I think we could get permission to shoot with a Cirrus plane, but due to the type of photos we're trying for, we'd need 'bigger' planes - like a Beech 18, for example. These aren't really "glamour" shots as much as re-creations and/or documentary almost. Jun 28 06 10:15 am Link Many small airports have an airport manager. If so, he should be able to give you contact information for the planes based at the airport. If it's too small for an airport manager and they have an FBO (that's the guy who does maintenance, sells gas, rents planes etc.) then he's your best bet for contact information. There are airports that have nothing at them. In that case if you can actually see the airplane get the tail number or N number. Use this URL to find their contact information http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry … nquiry.asp There's a link on that page to do a search by aircraft type/make and model. Good luck getting a Beech 18 if it's not already based at the airport. Good luck, I'd love to see your shots. David Jun 28 06 10:29 am Link FKVPhotoGraphics wrote: Now that sounds like a frick'n blast! Jun 28 06 10:38 am Link C R Photography wrote: I try really really hard to be nice to people. But on this one occassion I'm gonna make an exception. Jun 28 06 10:44 am Link Thanks for the info David - that link might end up helping as I found an old pic of a Beech 18 here in Colorado at an old airport, so I can see if it's still around the area. Jun 28 06 03:33 pm Link Sleepy Weasel wrote: No problem. Also, if all else fails, ask the old timers sitting around doing their hanger talk who's got the cool old planes. They'll know. You probably won't see most the cool stuff because the old classics are usually lovingly tucking in a hanger. Jun 28 06 08:59 pm Link J Merrill Images wrote: This is all good advice, and closely parallels my shoot experience at Houston Southwest Airport a year ago. I obtained permission to shoot around a flight school's planes, and all went well until the model and I shot around some other planes as well. I found out the next day that airport management was not pleased about the foray into the FBO hangar. Jun 28 06 09:09 pm Link David A wrote: This is a cool site - I haven't paid attention to this stuff in a long time and am glad to know about it. Years ago, one had to know the manufacturer/model codes to figure out what type of aircraft was being listed in the FAA registry. While these codes are still used in the site provided here (ie: 71028____ ... which is a Piper Pa28, aka Cherokee, of one type or another), you can just search by manufacturer/model name in it's search engine. Jun 28 06 10:22 pm Link J Merrill Images wrote: I'll take your word for it. My wife laughes at me because I'm afraid of heights but I like to fly and when I was younger I use to rock climb. I just can't stand on the edge of what I climbed and look down. Can't do that from my own roof either. Jun 29 06 12:02 am Link I used that site to track that Beech 18 that used to be at a now-abandoned airpark out here, and it appears it's now in an air museum in Texas. :-\ No other Beech 18s out here in the area. Guess I'll just have to go to the airports and look. I'm just not excited about Pipers and Cessnas.... Jun 29 06 12:14 am Link dont do "cockpit" shots in public and do not ask her to hold your joystick...otherwise, check this out: www.airliners.net ps...dont drive behind a jet. Jun 29 06 06:05 am Link Sleepy Weasel wrote: Yeah, but stinsons and mooneys are cool. Jun 29 06 01:19 pm Link BCG wrote: I'm so paranoid about scaring off a new model with potential innuendo that I'm not even going to SAY the word cockpit. I'll just say 'penile abyss.' Think she'll know what that means instead? Jun 29 06 05:34 pm Link I'm busting right now! I was able to track down the Beech 18 from an old photo and just got permission from the owner to use it for my photos....and it's apparently all shined up and looking better than ever. I'll certainly post pics from the shoot once I coordinate it with the model. Thanks again for posting that FAA airline ID link - that's what got me going in the right direction! Jun 30 06 01:46 pm Link Sweeeeet. Jun 30 06 01:49 pm Link I just got stiffed by the model. After all of the work I did tracking down the plane, getting permission, etc., as well as finding another unique location for a shot we wanted to collaborate on (also aviation related), she emails me today telling me she doesn't want to work with me anymore because she doesn't "feel comfortable with you posting in the MM forums about my contractual situation and contacting owners of planes and telling them my [real] name." Obviously, I never really discussed her name, contract, etc. here other than a mention that I *couldn't* use her name, and I told the owner of the plane her name because we wanted to use it for a shoot. In fact, I told her weeks ago that I told the owner her name and he'd actually met her. I made the mistake of giving her his name and number to talk directly to him about the shoot. She emailed me last week saying she hadn't heard back from him yet, but would like to get together to do a different shoot in the mean time. And by the way, we weren't shooting anything risque at all - it was going to be casual or aviation attire while posing on, in, or around the plane. Something doesn't add up. Either a reference I gave her turned on me for some reason (I can't imagine who or why), she wants to use the plane for a shoot with another photographer, or some other reason I can't think of. Sucks, but oh well. I'm off to find another model or models for these locations. Not gonna lose any sleep over it. Just one of those "WTF?!?" moments. Jul 15 06 12:35 pm Link It's one of those situations that makes one want to take up another type of photography. While there are many great models to work with, sometimes it seems like the flaky ones make the entire endeavor more of a pain in the behind than it is worth. Tell Ms. Privacy that anyone who is going to allow another person in or around their very, very expensive airplane has a perfect right to know who that person is. You might also remind her that in the course of everyday life, she has given her name to thousands of dopey store clerks, who are much more likely than the aircraft owner to be Ichabod Identity Thief or Maury Model Molester. Ladies, most of you are really, really nice and we love you but, will the rest please just get a clue? Jul 15 06 01:28 pm Link FKVPhotoGraphics wrote: One of the really cool things about being a professional photographer is unique access. Getting a chance to ride in a position like that is a once in a life time opportunity; no way I would turn that down. Jul 15 06 01:39 pm Link J Merrill Images wrote: Well, this particular person is in a "high profile" new job. In fact, when I found out about her promotion, I even told her I didn't want to do any risque stuff with her at all (even though she said she could do some anonymous stuff as long as it didn't hit the Internet). And her contract supposedly didn't ban her from modeling. She just needed to keep her image "clean". Not sure what I did that spooked her, but I don't buy her reason(s). Jul 15 06 02:12 pm Link FKVPhotoGraphics wrote: The guys name is Paul Bowen, and he's got some incredible shots. Jul 15 06 02:51 pm Link Sleepy Weasel wrote: Sorry to hear that! Jul 15 06 05:00 pm Link |